Methodological considerations of digital video observation: Beyond conversation analysis

References

• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arborelius, E., & Timpka, T. (1990). In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient–physician relationship? Medical Teacher, 12, 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Arborelius, E., & Timpka, T. (1991). Comparison of patients’ and doctors’ comments on videorecorded consultations. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 9, 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, T. (2000). Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: Advantages and limitations. Family Practice, 17, 422–427.
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. (1982). Something old and something new. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1982). Audiovisual records as a primary data source. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, R., Altschuler, A., George, S., Kinsman, J., Jimison, H., Robertson, N. R., et al. (2005). Effects of exam-room computing on clinician– patient communication: A longitudinal qualitative study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 677–682.
   Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. (2005). Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/standards/default.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, M., Jenkings, K., Wilson, R., & Purves, I. (2005). Multi-tasking in practice: Coordinated activities in the computer supported doctor– patient consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 74, 425–436.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1993). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. York, PA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greatbatch, D., Heath, C., Luff, P., & Campion, P. (1995). Conversation analysis: Human–computer interaction and the general practice consultation. In A. Monk & G. N. Gilbert (Eds.), Perspectives on HCI: Diverse approaches (pp. 152–190). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, A. (1982). Sound-image data records for research on social interaction. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2002). Video, ethnography and situated conduct. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 99–122). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K., Dahlager, L., & Lynoe, N. (2005). Conflicting notions of research ethics – The mutually challenging traditions of social scientists and medical researchers. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1741–1749.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., Forsyth, R., Georgiou, A., Braithewaite, J., & Westbrook, J. (2007). Visibilising the effects of computerising clinical care. Qualitative Research Journal, 6, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kumarapeli, P., De Lusignan, S., Koczan, P., Jones, B., & Sheeler, I. (2007). The feasibility of using UML to compare the impact of different brands of computer system on the clinical consultation. Informatics in Primary Care, 15, 245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K. (2001a). Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet, 358, 483–488.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud, K. (2001b). The art and science of clinical knowledge: Evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet, 358, 397–400.
   Google Scholar
• Margalit, S., Roter, D., Dunevant, M., Larson, S., & Reis, S. (2006). Electronic medical record use and physician–patient communication: An observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 61, 134–141.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. (2004). Hermeneutics in information systems. In L. Willcocks & J. Mingers (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 205–222). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., Dwan, K., Arnold, M., Phillips, C., & Trumble, S. (2009). Doctor, patient and computer – A framework for the new consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78, 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., Dwan, K., Phillips, C., & Arnold, M. (2007). Analysing the doctor–patient–computer relationship: The use of video data. Informatics in Primary Care, 14, 221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., Trumble, S., Arnold, M., Dwan, K., & Phillips, C. (2008). Computers in the new consultation: Within the first minute. Family Practice, 25, 202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Raingruber, B. (2003). Video-cued narrative reflection: A research approach for articulating tacit, relational and embodied understandings. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 1155–1169.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, P., Small, N., Rowley, E., Langdon, M., Ariss, S., & Wright, J. (2008). Electronic medical records in diabetes consultations: Participants’ gaze as an interactional resource. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1247–1263.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners. (2005). Video assessment of consulting skills in 2005. London: Workbook and Instructions.
   Google Scholar
• Ventres, W., Kooienga, S., Marlin, R., Vuckovic, N., & Stewart, V. (2005). Clinician style and examination room computers: A video ethnography. Family Medicine, 37, 276–281.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, D. (2005). Ethics, audit and research: All shades of grey. British Medical Journal, 330, 468–471.
   Google Scholar