Research method in education: The frame by which the picture hangs

References

• Alise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodologi-cal approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 103–126. doi:10.1177/1558689809360805
   Google Scholar
• Atherton J. S. (2011). Learning and teaching; critical reflection [On-line: UK]. Retrieved from http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/critical1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T. W. (2011, May). Transformative mixed methods and action research: Are they one methodology. Paper at American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Clancy, T. (1999). State of siege. London, England: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Coletto, R. (2008). When ‘paradigms’ differ: Scientific communication between scepticism and hope in recent philosophy of science. Koers (Bulletin for Christian Scholarship), 73, 445–467.
   Google Scholar
• Coletto, R. (2009). Strategies towards a reformation of the theology-based approach to Christian scholarship. In die Skriflig (In the light of Scripture), 43, 291–313.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2011, May). Securing a place at the table: A review and extension of legitimation criteria for the conduct of mixed research. Paper at American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Comte-Sponville, A. (2005). The little book of philosophy. London, England: Vintage – Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., & Strydom, P. (2010). Philosophies of social science: The classic and contemporary readings. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York, NY: Viking Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (1993). Philosophy of science and its discontents. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gratzer, W. (2000). The undergrowth of science. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2003). Straw dogs. London, England: Granta Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2009). Gray’s anatomy. London, England: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Grayling, A. C. (2010). Thinking of answers. London, England: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2006). Toward a methodology of mixed methods social inquiry. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 7–22. doi:10.1177/1558689807309969
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, S. (2003). Justice and conflict. In J. Baggini & J. Stangroom (Eds.), What philosophers think (pp. 133–142). London, England: Continuum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape. How science can determine human values. London, England: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133. doi:10.1177/1558689806298224
   Google Scholar
• La Folette, H. (2007). Ethics in practice. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lategan, L. O. K. (2008). Employing theological ethics to draft a professional ethic in research. Ned Geref Teologiese Tydskrif (DR Church Theological Journal), 49(3–4), 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Lategan, L. O. K. (2010). ‘n Raamwerk vir intellektuele vakmanskap – ‘n filosofiese benadering (A frame-work for intellectual artisanship – a philosophical approach.). Journal for Christian Scholarship, 46(3–4), 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Lusenga, R. M. (2010). School leaders’ moral understanding and moral reasoning (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. (2012). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, F. J. (2009, August). Theme 10: Religious and moral education: Exploring students’ inderstand-ing of values and moral reasoning. Paper at DETA Conference, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, A. (2009). The spiritual life of the intellectual. In W. Gumede & L. Dikeni (Eds.), The poverty of ideas. South African democracy and the retreat of intellectuals (pp. 56–66). Johannesburg, South Africa: Jacana.
   Google Scholar
• Noshulwana, V. (2011, February 17). Integrity and what it really means in age of entitlement. The Herald, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 114–139. doi:10.5172/mra.3.2.114
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11, 474–498.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). Conducting mixed analysis: A general typology. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1(1), 4–17. doi:10.5172/mra.455.1.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Poli, R. (2001). Foreword. Axiomathes, 12(1–2), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (2007). A theory of justice. In H. LaFolette (ed.), Ethics in practice (pp. 565–577). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rée, J., & Urmson, J. O. (2005). The concise encyclopedia of western philosophy. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, W. D. (2007). The zen of empirical research (ch. 1). Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/personal/archives/richards/Zen/Pages/Chap1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2003). Darwin and ethics. In J. Baggini & J. Stangroom (Eds.), What philosophers think (pp. 13–22). London, England: Continuum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, D. F. M. (2009). Philosophy: Discipline of the disciplines. Grand Rapids, MI: Paideia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, D. F. M. (2010). Die sentrale plek van ‘n lewens- en wêreldbeskouing. [The central position of a life and world view]. Koers (Bulletin for Christian Scholarship), 75(1), 53–77.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, D. F. M. (2011). Sisteem, modale universalit-eit en die onderskeiding tussen die kern en periferie van teorieë. [System, modal universality and the distinction between the core and periphery of theories]. Journal for Christian Scholarship, 47(1), 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Beek, A. (2010). Is God terug? [Is God back?]. Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Meidema.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Zee, T., & De Jong, A. (2009). Teachers as a source of inspiration in catholic schools. Journal of Empirical Theology, 22, 7–29. doi:10.1163/157092509X437198
   Google Scholar
• Weideman, A. (2010). Stability and change: What our theoretical frameworks accomplish for us. Journal of Christian Scholarship, 46(3–4), 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (2003, January). Why a world state is inevitable: Teleology and the logic of anarchy. Retrieved from Google Scholar: 10.1.1.101.8876[1].pdf
   Google Scholar