Exploring teachers’ perceptions of videoconferencing practice through space, movement and the material and virtual environments

References

• Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1998). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 248–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baynham, M. (2003). Narratives in space and time: Beyond ‘backdrop’ accounts of narrative orientation. Narrative Inquiry, 13(2), 347–366. Retrieved from http://www.benjamins.nl
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2008). The body. The key concepts. Oxford, England: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. D., Cromby, J., Harper, D. H., Johnson, K., & Reavey, P. (2011). Researching ‘experience’: Embodiment, methodology, process. Theory & Psychology, 21, 493–515. doi:10.1177/0959354310377543
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Frels, R. K., & O’Cathain, A. (2011). Methodological applications: Illuminating complex issues in education. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(2), 219–222. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1022983161?accountid=8440
   Google Scholar
• Combs, J. P., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). Describing and illustrating data analysis in mixed research. International Journal of Education, 2(2), E13. Retrieved from www.macrothink.org/ije
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, J., & Gwyn, R. (2003). Introduction. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 1–16). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2005). Embodied knowing in online contexts. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37, 719–744. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00153.x
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L. (2007). The return of the myth of the mental. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 50, 352–365. doi:10.1080/00201740701489245
   Google Scholar
• Emmison, M., & Smith, P. (2000). Researching the visual: Images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284. Retrieved from www.iste.org/jrte
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P., & Stenner, A. J. (2010). Integrating qualitative and quantitative research approaches via the phenomenological method. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(1), 89–103. doi:10.5172/mra.2011.5.1.89
   Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, R. E., & Kuntz, A. M. (2011). A dialogue on space and method in qualitative research on education. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 15–22. doi:10.1177/1077800410389440
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 19–42). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L. (2010). Multimodality, virtual methodologies and higher education. In M. Savin-Baden & C. Howell Major (Eds.), New approaches to qualitative research. Wisdom and uncertainty (pp. 80–88). Oxon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2011). Beliefs and ICT: What can we learn from experienced educators? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 289–300. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2011.610930
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, J., & Bretag, T. (2010). Negotiating contested discourses of learning technologies in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 106–120.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Video-based studies of work practice. Sociology Compass, 1, 156–173. doi:10.111/j.1751-9020.2007.0012.x
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28, 1395–1416. doi:10.1177/0170840607068258
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, T., Gubby, L., & Smith, A. (2011). Space frontiers for new pedagogies: A tale of constraints and possibilities. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 189–201. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.503270
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, N. (2005). Beyond the methods debate. Towards embodied ways of knowing. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 259–296). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2012). Introduction to the special issue of video-analysis and videography. Qualitative Research, 12, 251–254. doi:10.1177/1468794111436144
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, A. M. (2010). New approaches to qualitative research. Wisdom and uncertainty. In M. Savin-Baden & C. Howell Major (Eds.), The politics of space in qualitative research (pp. 145–153). Oxon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, A. M. (2012). Reconsidering the workplace: Faculty perceptions of their work and working environments. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 769–782. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.541556
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, A. M., & Berger, J. B. (2011). Faculty work practices in material environments: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 239–264.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 587–604. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.587
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2011). Writing publishable mixed research articles: Guidelines for emerging scholars in the health sciences and beyond. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(1), 7–24. doi:10.5172/mra.2011.5.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Luff, P., & Heath, C. (2012). Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: Social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective. Qualitative Research, 12, 255–279. doi:10.1177/1468794112436655
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behaviour. (A. Fisher, Trans.). London, England: Methuen & Co. Ltd. (Original work published 1942).
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1970). Themes from the lectures at the College de France 1952–1960. (J. O’Neill, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London, England: Routledge. (Original work published 1945).
   Google Scholar
• Murchison, J. M. (2010). Ethnography essentials. Designing, conducting and presenting your research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Burke Johnson, R., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 114–139. doi:10.5172/mra.3.2.114
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, P. (2010). Locating space in qualitative research. Questioning culture through the corporeal. In M. Savin-Baden & C. Howell Major (Eds.), New approaches to qualitative research. Wisdom and uncertainty (pp. 121–130). Oxon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, P., & Were, P. (2008). Observing places: Using space and material culture in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 8, 616–634. doi:10.1177/1468794108093899
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C., Arnold, M., Phillips, C., & Dwan, K. (2010). Methodological considerations of digital video observation: Beyond conversation analysis. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(2), 90–99. doi:10.5172/mra.2010.4.2.090
   Google Scholar
• Penn-Edwards, S. (2012). Human factors affecting the use of video recording methodology in qualitative research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(2), 150–159. doi:10.5172/mra.2012.6.2.150
   Google Scholar
• Schlanger, N. (2006). Introduction. Technological commitments: Marcel Mauss and the study of techniques in the French social sciences. In N. Schlanger (Ed.), Marcel Mauss. Techniques, technology and civilization (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Durkheim Press/ Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shilling, C. (2007). Sociology and the body: Classical traditions and new agendas. The Sociological Review, 55, 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00689.x
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2009). From space to place: University performance and its built environment. Higher Education Policy, 22, 209–223. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.30
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2006). Space. Theory Culture, Society, 23, 139–146. doi:10.1177/0263276406063780
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T., & Kress, G. (2011). Discourse semiotics. In T. A. Van Djik (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 107–125). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar