A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues

References

• Bazeley P (2003) Teaching mixed methods, Qualitative Research Journal 3: 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman MM (2008) Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brady H and Collier D (Eds) (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan D and Bryman A (2007) Contextualizing methods choice in organizational research, Organizational Research Methods 10(3): 483–501.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron R (2008) Mixed Methods in Management Research, in Proceedings of the 22nd ANZAM
   Google Scholar
• Conference, Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management, Auckland, December 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron R and Miller P (2007) Mixed methods research: Phoenix of the paradigm wars, in Proceedings of the 21st ANZAM Conference, Australian & New Zealand Academy of Management, Sydney, December 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Caracelli J and Greene V (1997) ‘Crafting Mixed-Method Evaluation designs’ in Advances in Mixed Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms, Greene J and Caracelli V (Eds) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Caulley D (1994) Notes on the basic characteristics of postpositivist interpretive inquiry, in Neville, Willis & Edwards (Eds) Qualitative Research in Adult Education: a colloquium on theory, practice, supervision and assessment, Centre for Research in Education & Work, Adelaide: University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L and Manion L (1989) Research Methods in Education (3rd edn). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J (1994) Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Creswell J (2003) Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J and Plano Clark V (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin N and Lincoln Y (Eds) (2005) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Earley M (2007) Developing a syllabus for a mixedmethods research course, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10(2): 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle T and Elliker F (2005) A cartography of qualitative research in Switzerland, Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(3): Art 24 September.
   Google Scholar
• Greene JC (2007) Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene J and Caracelli V (Eds) (1997) Advances in Mixed-Method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Guba E (1990) The Paradigm Dialog. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guba E and Lincoln Y (2005) ‘Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions & emerging confluences’ in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson W, Creswell J, Clark V, Petska K and Creswell J (2005) Mixed methods research designs in Counselling Psychology, Journal of Counselling Psychology 52(2): 224–235.
   Google Scholar
• Hurmerinta-Peltomaki L and Nummela N (2006) Mixed methods in International Business Research: A Value-added Perspective, Management International Review 46(4): 439–459.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RB and Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come, Educational Researchers 33(7): 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Keohane R and Verba S (1994) Designing Social Inquiry, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxcy S (2003) ‘Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism’ in Tashakkori A & Teddlie C (Eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan J and Schumacher S (2006) Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (6th edn). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens D (2005) Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd edn). Boston: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles M and Huberman A (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers J (1997) ‘Multi-paradigm multimethodolgy’ in Mingers J & Gill A (Eds) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers J (2003) The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature, Information Systems Journal 13: 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers J and Gill A (Eds) (1997) Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D (1998) Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research, Qualitative Health Research 8: 362–376.
   Google Scholar
• Morse J (2003) ‘Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design’ in Tashakkori A & Teddlie C (Eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman W (2006) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th edn). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark V and Creswell J (Eds) (2007) The Mixed Methods Reader. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin C (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin C (1994) Constructing Social Research: The unity and diversity of method. Thousand Oaks CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin C and Becker HS (1992) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux B (2006) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research, International Sociology 21(5): 679–706.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux B and Grimm H (2006) Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (Eds) (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C and Tashakkori A (2003) ‘Major Issues and Controversies in the use of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences’ in Tashakkori A &
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C (Eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie C and Tashakkori A (2008) Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Thomas RM (2003) Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Theses and Dissertations. Thousand Oaks CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar