Rural Women’s Empowerment in a Communication Technology Project: Some Contradictory Effects

References

• Anderson, J. 1996. Yes, but is it empowerment? Initiation, implementation and outcomes of community action. In B. Humphries (ed). Critical perspectives on empowerment. Birmingham: Venture Press, 1996. 69-83.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, E. and W. Faulkner. 1985. ‘Smothered by invention. The masculinity of technology’. In W. Faulkner and E. Arnold (eds). Smothered by invention. Technology in women’s lives. London, Pluto Press, 1985.18-50.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, S. and Wintram, C. 1991. Feminist groupwork. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Claridge, C. 1996. Women, development and the environment: A method to facilitate women’s empowerment. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brisbane: Department of Agriculture, The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Daws, L.1997. An analysis of the role of the Internet in supporting rural women’s leadership initiatives. Paper presented to the Sixth Women and Labour Conference, Deakin University, Geelong, 28-30 November.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. C. Gordon (ed) New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. 1992. Empowerment. The politics of alternative development. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gillman, M. 1996. Empowering professionals in higher education? In B. Humphries (ed). Critical perspectives on empowerment. Birmingham: Venture Press 1996. 99-116.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. 1992. What we can do for you! What can “we” do for “you”?: Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke and J. Gore (eds). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge, 1992. 54-73.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, M. and Lennie, J. 1998. Constructing and reconstructing rural women in Australia: the politics of change, diversity and identity. Sociologia Ruralis, 38 (3), 351-370.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, M., Lundin, R. and Daws, L. 1996. Women and networking: Women’s voices from elsewhere. A report on the project: Queensland rural women’s use of communication technologies: Implications for information and referral services and for networking organisations. Brisbane: Centre for Policy and Leadership Studies in Education, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W. 1999. Cyborg melody. An introduction to women on the net (WoN). In W. Harcourt (ed). Women@Internet. Creating new cultures in cyberspace. London and New York: Zed Books, 1999.1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, L., 1998. ‘Using community learning to identify stores of social capital: Have we found the ‘right’ community?’. In Learning communities, regional sustainability and the learning society, an international symposium. Conference proceedings, Vol 2, Launceston: Centre for Research and Learning, pp.186-196.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. 1994. Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. Keynote talk, American Library Association Annual Convention, Miami, June 27.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, B. 1994. Empowerment and social research: Elements for an analytic framework. In B. Humphries and C. Truman (eds). Re-thinking social research. Anti-discriminatory approaches in research methodology. Aldershot: Avebury, 185-204.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, B. 1996. Contradictions in the culture of empowerment. In B. Humphries (ed). Critical perspectives on empowerment. Birmingham: Venture Press, 1996.1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1991. Getting smart. Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spender, D. 1995. Nattering on the net. Women, power and cyberspace. North Melbourne: Spinifex.
   Google Scholar
• Lennie, J. 2000. Voice and silence in an email conversation group involving rural and urban women in Australia. In the electronic conference Women’s organisations and the building of civil society in the twenty-first century: an international perspective, conducted by the Global Network on Women’s Advocacy and Civil Society, 4-15 December, 2000. http://www.philanthropy.org/GN/KEN/gntext/. [Accessed 4 December 2000]
   Google Scholar
• Lennie, J. 2001. Troubling empowerment: an evaluation and critique of a feminist action research project involving rural women and interactive communication technologies. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brisbane: Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell R. and Wehn, U. (eds). 1998. Knowledge societies: Information technology for sustainable development. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milio, N. 1996. Engines of empowerment: Using information technology to create healthy communities and challenge public policy. Chicago: Health Administration Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. and Marshall, J. 1991. Education and empowerment: Postmodernism and the critique of humanism. Education and Society. 9 (2), 123-134.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, D. 1996. New community networks. Wired for change. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., Diamond, A., and Smith, B. 1997. Opportunities for communities: Public access to networked information technology. Canberra: Department of Social Security.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. 1988. Participatory evaluation: Towards a transformation of assessment for women’s studies programs and projects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 10 (3), 191-199.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L., Wood, L., Daws, L and Seinen, A. 2001. Creating rural connections: Book 1: Project overview. Brisbane: The Communication Centre, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Spender, D. 1995. Nattering on the net. Women, power and cyberspace. North Melbourne: Spinifex.
   Google Scholar
• The Rural Women and ICTs (RWICTs) Research Team. 1999. The new pioneers: Women in rural Queensland collaboratively exploring the potential of communication and information technologies for personal, business and community development. Brisbane: The Communication Centre: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, H. with Williams, G., Clark, J. and Couey, A. 1993. Gender issues in online communications. http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/gender/bawit.cfp93 [Accessed 31 July 1997]
   Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, L. 2001. Feminist Internet studies. Feminist Media Studies 1 (1), 67-72.
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, Y. 1997. Everyday evaluation on the run. 2nd ed, Allen and Unwin: St Leonards, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 1991. Feminism confronts technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welbourn, A. 1991. RRA and the analysis of difference. RRA Notes. 14, 14-23.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 1988. Five faces of oppression. Philosophical Forum. XIX (4), 270-290.
   Google Scholar