Entrepreneurial capacity and the new technology-based small firm

References

• Alvarez, S. and Busenitz, L. (2001) The entrepreneurship of resource based theory. Journal of Management 27, 655–676.
   Google Scholar
• Bhavé, MP . (1994) A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing 9, 223–242.
   Google Scholar
• Bygrave, W.D. (1989) The entrepreneurship Paradigm (I): a philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 14, 20
   Google Scholar
• Bygrave William D. and Hofer Charles W.. (1991) Theorizing About Entrepreneurship. . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 6, 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P. and Klofsten, M . (2003) The Business Platform: Developing an Instrument to Gauge and to assist the Development of Young Firms. Journal of Small Business Management 41, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P.F. (2002) The Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review – The Innovating Enterprise
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14, 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hindle, K. (2002) How entrepreneurial capacity transforms ‘small-i’ into ‘Big-F innovation: implications for national policy. Telecommunications Journal of Australia 52, 51
   Google Scholar
• Hindle, K. and Yencken, J. (2003) Public Research Commercialisation, Entrepreneurship and New Technology Based Firms: An Integrated Model… Technovation
   Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M . (1998) The Business Platform: Entrepreneurship and management in the early stages of a firm’s development., edn. Luxembourg: TII – European Association for the Transfer of Technologies, Innovation and Industrial Information.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (1996) Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking to Performance. Academy of Management Review 21, 135–172.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P.D. (1985) Entrepreneurship: Process and Abilities. American Journal of Small Business 10, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, F. (1995–1999) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm First edition, edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell and New York: John Wiley & Sons. Second edition, 1980, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rebernik, M . and Mulej, M . (2000) Requisite holism, isolating mechanisms and entrepreneurship. Kyhernetes 29, 9/10, 1126–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. (2000) Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Organisation Science: a Journal of the Institute of Management 11, 448
   Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz, R. (1994) University firms: spin-off companies from universities. Science and Public Policy 21, 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Upstill, G. and Symington, D. (1999) Generating New Companies from CSIRO Technology. Canberra: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Venkataraman, S. (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In: Katz, J. and Brockhaus, R., (Eds.) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Greenwich, CT, USA.: JAI Press]
   Google Scholar
• Vohora, A., Lockett, A. and Wright, M. (2002) Critical Junctures in the Growth in University High-Tech Spinout Companies. Nottingham University Business School Jubilee Campus.. Presented at Babson Kauffman 2002 Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boulder, Colorado:
   Google Scholar
• Yencken, J. and Gillin, M . (2003a) E.ntrepreneurship, Holism and Technological Innovation: Towards an Integrated Model. Paper presented at High-Tech Small Firms (HTSF) Conference, Manchester Business School, June 2003. Manchester: Manchester University.
   Google Scholar
• Yencken, J. and Gillin, M . (2003b) Entrepreneurial Capacity and Resource Based Theory: Prior Knowledge, Skills And Motivation In The Opportunity Discovery Process. Paper presented at Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson. June 2003: Babson Kauffman Foundation.
   Google Scholar