181
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

UNIVERSAL INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR ACCOMMODATING STUDENTS IN SOCIAL WORK COURSES

&
Pages 269-277 | Published online: 16 Mar 2013

References

  • Alperin, D. E. (1988). The physically disabled BSW student: Implications for field education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 2(2), 99–111.
  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §12101 et seq. (West 1993).
  • Bricout, J. C. (2001). Making computer-mediated education responsive to the accommodation needs of students with disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 267–281.
  • Center for Applied Special Technology. (2000). Summary of universal design for learning concepts. Retrieved March 1, 2001, from http://www.cast.org/research/udl/index.html
  • Cole, B. S., & Cain, M. W. (1996). Social work students with disabilities: A proactive approach to accommodation. Journal of Social Work Education, 32, 339–349.
  • Cole, B. S., Christ, C. C., & Light, T. R. (1995). Social work education and students with disabilities: Implications of section 504 and the ADA. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 261–268.
  • Curriculum Transfer and Design. (2000). Curriculum transformation and disability workshop facilitator's guide. Minneapolis, MN: General College, University of Minnesota.
  • Jehangir, R. (2003). Charting new courses: Learning communities and universal design. In J. Higbee (Ed.), Curriculum transformation and disability: Implementing universal design in higher education (pp. 79–91). Minneapolis: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota.
  • Johnson, D. A., & Fox, J. A. (2003). Creating curb cuts in the classroom: Adapting universal design principles to education. In J. Higbee (Ed.), Curriculum transformation and disability: Implementing universal design in higher education (pp. 7–21). Minneapolis: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy, General College, University of Minnesota.
  • Nelson, J. R., Dodd, J. M., & Smith, D. J. (1990). Faculty willingness to accommodate students with learning disabilities: A comparison among academic divisions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 185–189.
  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan.
  • Pardeck, J. T. (1999). Disability discrimination in social work education: Current issues for social work programs and faculty. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 19(1/2), 151–163.
  • Pardeck, J. T. (2002). A commentary on the admission and retention of students with disabilities in social work programs. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 1(3), 3–13.
  • Paul, S. (2000). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature. College Student Journal, 34, 367–378.
  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.A. [section] 701 et seq.
  • Reeser, L. C. (1992). Students with disabilities in practicum: What is reasonable accommodation? Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 98–109.
  • Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. Retrieved March 1, 2001, from http://www.air.org/forum/pdf/rose.pdf
  • Selingo, J. (1998). States and colleges wrangle over paying for services to disabled students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(41), A37.
  • Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. (1998). Universal Instructional Design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47–51.
  • The Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design: Version 2.0. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design.
  • Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman, L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
  • Williams, W., & Ceci, S. (1999). Accommodating learning disabilities can bestow unfair advantages. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(48), B4–5.
  • Wolinsky, S., & Whelan, A. (1999). Federal law and the accommodation of students with LD: The lawyers' look at the BU decision. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4), 286–291.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.