FIELD NOTES: A CONCEPTUAL APPLICATION OF ATTACHMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH TO THE SOCIAL WORK STUDENT-FIELD INSTRUCTOR SUPERVISORY RELATIONSHIP

References

• Agass, D. (2002). Countertransference, supervision, and the reflection process. Journal of Social Work Practice, 16(2), 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., & van IJzendoorn, M. (1993). A psychometric study of the Adult Attachment Interview: Reliability and discriminant validity. Developmental Psychology, 29, 870–879.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. (2004). Viewing telephone therapy through the lens of attachment theory and infant research. Clinical Social Work Journal, 32, 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss (Vol. 3). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, K. (2002). Modifying field instructors' supervisory approach using stage models of student development. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(3/4), 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, M. (2003). Clinical implications of attachment theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23(1), 27–53.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2003). The development of psychopathology from infancy to adulthood: The mysterious unfolding of disturbance in time. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 212–239.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A., & Abramson, J. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, C. (2004). Anxiety experienced by foundation-year MSW students entering field placement: Implications for admissions, curriculum, and field instruction. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1996). Adult attachment interview (3rd ed.). Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, K., Grossman, K., & Waters, E. (Eds.) (2005). Attachment from infancy to adulthood: The major longitudinal studies. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 395–433). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (1996). Attachment, intimacy, autonomy: Using attachment theory in adult psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Itzhaky, H., & Itzhaky, T. (1996). The therapysupervision dialectic. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Itzhaky, H., & Sztern, L. (1999). The take over of parent-child dynamics in a supervisory relationship: Identifying the role transformation. Clinical Social Work Journal, 27, 247–258.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. (2004). Attachment disorders: The education gap. Social Work Today, 4(6), 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1992a). Supervision in social work (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1992b). What's wrong, what's right with social work supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 10(1), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students' views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1/2), Serial No. 209, 66–104.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, R., Cooper, G., Hoffman, K., & Powell, B. (2002). The circle of security project: Attachment-based intervention with caregiver-pre-school child dyads. Attachment & Human Development, 4(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Rholes, S., & Simpson, J. (Eds.) (2004). Adult attachment: Theory, research and clinical implications. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sable, P. (2000). Attachment and adult psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Slade, A. (1999). Attachment theory and research: Implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 575–594). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Sroufe, A., Egeland, B., Carlson, A., & Collins, A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Strean, H. (2000). Resolving therapeutic impasses by using the supervisor's countertransference. Clinical Social Work Journal, 28, 263–279.
   Google Scholar