References
- Abbott, A. A. (1986). The field placement contract: Its use in maintaining comparability between employment-related and traditional field placements. Journal of Social Work Education, 22, 57–66.
- Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Globerman, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service: Testing, reliability, and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 385–401.
- Caspi, J., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Educational supervision in social work: A task centered model for field instruction and staff development. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
- Dore, M. M., Epstein, B. B., & Herrerias, C. (1992). Evaluating students' micro practice field performance: Do universal learning objectives exist? Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 353–362.
- Glassman, U. E. (2000). Comparing a work– study field instruction model with an assigned field instruction model. Ann Arbor, MI: Bell & Howell Information and Learning.
- Hines, W. J., & Singer, T. L. (1984). Workstudy: A model for part-time social work education. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 3, 23–27.
- Kendall, K. (2002). Council on Social Work Education: Its antecedents and first twenty years. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
- Koroloff, N. M. (1989). Using the employment site for field instruction: A case for structure. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5, 45–48.
- Lennon, T. M. (2004). Statistics on social work education in the United States: 2002. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
- Martin, M. (1989). Employment setting as a practicum site: A field instruction dilemma. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 5, 39–44.
- Navari, S. (1991). The implications of part-time programs for field work models: Provocative dilemmas and conceptual frameworks. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 272–287). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt.
- Royse, D., Dhooper, S. S., & Rompf, E. L. (1999). Field instruction: A guide for social work students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2005). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Schneck, D. (1991). Integration of learning in field education: Elusive goal and educational imperative. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 67–77). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
- White, H. R. (1988). Pros and cons of student placement with employers. Arete, 13, 50–59.