- Council Directive (EEC) 67/227 of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes [1967] OJ 71/1031 (First VAT Directive).
- This description is now carried on in Article 1 of the current VAT Directive (Council Directive (EC) 2006/112 of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, [2006] OJ L347/1 (ECVD)).
- See also Ad van Doesum and Gert-Jan van Norden, ‘The Right to Deduct under EU VAT’ [2011] International VAT Monitor 323.
- See Case C-29/08 AB SKF [2009] ECR I-10413, para 57.
- See Case C-408/98 Abbey National [2001] ECR I-1361, para 35; AB SKF (n 4) para 58.
- In this context the terms ‘overhead cost’ and ‘general costs’ are regarded as synonyms. See differently van Doesum and van Norden (n 3).
- See eg Ad van Doesum, Herman van Kesteren and Gert-Jan van Norden,'share Disposals and the Right of Deduction of Input VAT' (2010) 2 EC Tax Review 64; John Watson, Tom Cartwright and Eleanor Dixon, ‘A Recipe for Chaos' [2010] May/June International VAT Monitor 183; Dennis Jensen and Henrik Stensgaard, ‘The Distinction between Direct and General Costs with Regard to the Deduction of Input VAT: The Case of Acquisition, Holding and Sale of Shares' (2012) 1 World Tax Journal 3.
- Case C-104/12 Becker [2013] ECR I-0000.
- Case C-651/11 X BV [2013] ECR I-0000.
- In this context the term ‘exempt’ refers to supplies covered by Arts 132, 135 and 136 ECVD.
- Case C-184/04 Uudenkaupungin Kaupunki [2006] ECR I-3039, para 24.
- See Caroline Heber, ‘Issues of Shares and Partnership Interests, and the Look-Through Approach within the Scope of VAT and GST’ (2013) 2 World Journal of VAT/GST Law 24; Joachim Englisch, ‘The Share Deal as a Non-Taxable Transaction’ in Thomas Ecker, Michael Lang and Ine Lejeune (eds), The Future of Indirect Taxation (Kluwer, 2012) 567; Chris Bates and Julia Lloyd, ‘Skatteverket v AB SKF: A New Approach to VAT Recovery on a Share Sale' (2010) 1 British Tax Review 31; van Doesum et al (n 7) 73.
- See also Watson et al (n 7).
- Becker (n 8).
- Case C-4/94 BLP [1995] ECR I-983.
- See also the German Finanzamt's considerations, as they are referred to in Becker (n 8) para 15.
- Becker (n 8) para 32.
- Ibid, paras 19–20.
- In this context the ECJ referred to Case C-98/98 Midland Bank [2000] ECR I-4177, para 24 and Abbey National (n 5) para 23, and finally to Case C-435/05 Investrand [2007] ECR I-1315, para 23.
- In this context the ECJ referred to Midland Bank (n 19) para 31 and Case C-465/03 Kretztechnik [2005] ECR I-4357, para 36.
- Becker (n 8) para 21.
- Midland Bank (n 19) para 25.
- Becker (n 8) para 22.
- BLP (n 15) para 24. Reference was also made to Case C-108/99 Cantor Fitzgerald [2001] ECR I-7257, para 33 and AB SKF (n 4) para 47.
- BLP (n 15) paras 3 and 12.
- Ibid, para 4.
- Ibid, Opinion of AG Lenz, para 16.
- Ibid, para 15.
- Ibid, para 28 (emphasis added).
- Now Art 173(1) ECVD.
- Council Directive (EC) 77/388 of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes—Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment [1977] OJ L145/1 (Sixth VAT Directive).
- Now Art 168 ECVD.
- BLP (n 15) para 19 (emphasis added). This argumentation is repeated in a large number of later cases. See eg Midland Bank (n 19) para 20.
- BLP (n 15) paras 20–21.
- See similarly Cantor Fitzgerald (n 24) para 33 and AB SKF (n 4) para 47.
- Becker (n 8) para 23.
- Ibid, paras 30f.
- X BV(n 9).
- Now Art 135(1)(f) ECVD. See X BV (n 9) para 56.
- Ibid, para 11.
- Ibid, para 55.
- Ibid, para 55.
- Ibid, para 56.
- See most notably AB SKF (n 4) paras 60 and 62.
- BLP (n 15) Opinion of AG Lenz, para 24.
- Ibid, paras 16 and 27.
- Ibid, para 36.
- Ibid, para 37.
- X BV (n 9) paras 55 and 56.
- See also AB SKF (n 4) paras 60 and 62 (emphasis added).
- Case C-16/00 Cibo Participation [2001] ECR I-6663, paras 31 and 33; AB SKF (n 4) para 60; Case C-118/11 Eon Aset Menidjmunt [2012] ECR I-0000, para 48; and Becker (n 8) paras 19–20.
- See Case C-26/12 PPG [2013] ECR I-0000, para 18.
- See Ibid, Opinion of AG Sharpston, para 20.
- Ibid, para 22
- Ibid, para 23.
- Ibid, paras 24–25.
- See Ibid, Opinion of AG Sharpston, para 28 (emphasis added).
- Ibid, paras 22 and 23.
- The right to deduct can, however, be restricted due to explicit provisions in the legislation (Art 176 ECVD). The self-supply rules of the VAT Directive may also be applicable.
- For a potentially different view see Heber (n 12).
- See Kretztechnik (n 20).
- See also Joachim Englisch, ‘The EU Perspective on VAT Exemptions' in Rita de la Feria (ed), VAT Exemptions (Wolters Kluwer, 2013) 37ff; van Doesum and van Norden (n 3); Peter Melz, ‘Activities Outside the Scope of VAT and Exempt Activities' [2011] September International VAT Monitor 331.
The direct and immediate link test regarding deduction of input VAT: a consumption-based test versus an economic-based test?
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.