24
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Paper

The Making of a ‘Classic’ in South East Asian Studies

Another Look at Kahin, Agoncillo and the Revolutions

Pages 595-609 | Published online: 19 Oct 2018

References

  • AbdullahT. MaunatiY., eds (1998), Toward the Promotion of Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia, Program of Southeast Asian Studies, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta.
  • AgoncilloT. (1956), The Revolt of the Masses: The Story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan, University of the Philippines, Quezon City.
  • AgoncilloT. (2003), ‘Philippine historiography in the age of Kalaw’, in ChurchillB., ed, History and Culture, Language and Literature: Selected Essays of Teodoro A. Agoncillo, UST Press, Manila, pp 3–29.
  • AndersonB. (1992), ‘The changing ecology of Southeast Asian Studies in the United States, 1950–1990’, in HirschmanC. KeyesC.F. HuttererK.L., eds. Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America, The Association of Asian Studies, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 25–40.
  • AndersonB. (2003), ‘Introduction’, in Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp v–xx.
  • AndersonB. (2010 [1982]), ‘Perspective and method in American research on Indonesia’, in AndersonBenedict KahinAudrey, eds, Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate (Equinox Classic Indonesia Book reprint), Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, Ithaca, NY, pp 115–136.
  • AndersonB.R.O. (1972), Java in a Time of Revolution: Occupation and Resistance, 1944–1946, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  • BavieraA. TademE. MalayV., eds (2003), Southeast Asian Studies in Asia: An Assessment, UP Asian Center, Quezon City.
  • BRP (1954), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia by George M. Kahin’, International Affairs, Vol 30, No 1, p 124.
  • BonuraC. SearsL. (2007), ‘Introduction: Knowledges that travel in Southeast Asian Area Studies’, in Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, in association with NUS Press, Singapore, pp 3–32.
  • ChenK.-H. (2010), Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  • ChongT. (2009), ‘Nationalism in Southeast Asia: Revisiting Kahin, Roff, and Anderson’, Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, Vol 24, No 1, pp 1–17.
  • ChurchillB. (2001), ‘Historiography of 1898 and critical bibliography’, in The Philippine Revolution of 1896: Ordinary Lives in Extraordinary Times, Ateneo De Manila University Press, Quezon City, pp 277–300.
  • ChurchillB.R., ed (1997), Determining the Truth: The Story of Andres Bonifacio: Being Critiques of and Commentaries on Inventing a Hero, the Posthumous Recreation of Andres Bonifacio, Manila Studies Association, Manila.
  • CribbR. (1991), Gangsters and Revolutionaries: The Jakarta People's Militia and the Indonesian Revolution 1945–1949, Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
  • CribbR. (2005), ‘Circles of esteem, standard work and euphoric couplets: Dynamics of academic life in Indonesian Studies’, Critical Asian Studies, Vol 37, No 2, pp 289–304.
  • du BoisC. (1953), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution by George Kahin’, American Historical Review, Vol 58, No 3, pp 631–633.
  • FaridH. (2005), ‘The class question in Indonesian social sciences’, in Social Science and Power in Indonesia, Equinox Publishing, Jakarta, and ISEAS, Singapore, pp 167–195.
  • FeithH. (1982), ‘The study of Indonesian politics: A survey and an apologia’, in AndersonB. KahinA., eds, Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate, Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, Ithaca, NY, pp 41–53.
  • FrederickW. (1991), ‘Agoncillo, Teodoro’, in BoiaL., ed, Great Historians of Modern Age: An International Dictionary, Greenwood Press, New York, pp 595–596.
  • LanGoh Beng, ed (2011), Decentring and Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
  • GuerreroM. (1977), ‘Luzon at war: Contradictions in Philippine society, 1898–1902’, PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • GuerreroM. VillegasR. (1997), ‘The ugly American returns’, Philippine Daily Inquirer, pp G1–G2.
  • GuillermoR. (2007), ‘A book review of The Promise of the Foreign’, Kritika Kultura, Vol 9, pp 97–104.
  • HadizV. (1989), ‘Politik, budaya, dan perubahan sosial: Sebuah rekonstruksi dan kritik terhadap pemikiran Ben Anderson’, Prisma, Vol 8, No 2, pp 29–49.
  • HernandezJ. Del RosasioS. (1956), The Revolt of the Masses: The Story Behind Agoncillo's Story of Andres Bonifacio, JM Hernandez, Manila.
  • HeryantoA. (2007), ‘Can there be Southeast Asians in Southeast Asian Studies?’ in SearsL., ed, Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, and NUS Press, Singapore, pp 75–108.
  • HilaA. (2001), The Historicism of Teodoro Agoncillo, UST Publishing House, Manila.
  • HirschmanC. KeyesC.F. HuttererK.L., eds (1992), Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America, Association for Asian Studies, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • HuiY.-F. (2009), ‘The most influential books of Southeast Asian Studies’, Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, Vol 24, No 1, pp vii–xi.
  • IletoR.C. (2011), ‘Reflections on Agoncillo's The Revolt of the Masses and the politics of history’, Southeast Asian Studies, Vol 49, No 3, pp 496–520.
  • JoseV. (1976), ‘The bankruptcy of the subjectivist conception of history: A reply to Agoncillo’, Solidarity: Current Affairs, Ideas and the Arts, Vol 10, Nos 5–6, pp 101–114.
  • KahinA. ed (1985), Regional Dynamics of the Indonesian Revolution: Unity from Diversity, University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI.
  • KahinGeorge M. (2003a [1952]), Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia, 2 ed, Southeast Asia Program Publications, Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • KahinGeorge McTurnan (2003b), Southeast Asia: A Testament, RoutledgeCurzon, New York.
  • KledenI. (1986), ‘Alternative social science as Indonesian problematique’, New Asian Vision, Vol 3, No 2, pp 6–22.
  • KloosterH.A.J. (1997), Bibliography of the Indonesian Revolution, KITLV Press, Leiden.
  • LevD. (2000), ‘KahinGeorge McT (1918–2000)’, Inside Indonesia, available from website: http://www.insideindonesia.org/edition-62/george-mct-kahin-1918-2000 (accessed 3 June 2010).
  • LevineD. (1969), ‘History and social structure in the study of contemporary Indonesia’, Indonesia, Vol 9, pp 5–19.
  • MakiJ. (1953), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia by George M. Kahin’, Western Political Quarterly, Vol 6, No 1, p 185.
  • MaryanovG.S. (1974), The Condition of Southeast Asian Studies in the United States, 1972, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
  • MayG.A. (1987), A Past Recovered, New Day Publishers, Quezon City.
  • MayG.A. (1991), ‘Agoncillo's Bonifacio: Revolt of the Masses reconsidered’, Pilipinas, Vol 17, pp 51–64.
  • MayG.A. (1996), Inventing a Hero: The Posthumous Re-Creation of Andres Bonifacio, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  • MayG.A. (1998), ‘Review of talking history: Conversations with Teodoro Andal Agoncillo, edited by OcampoAmbeth R.’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol 57, No 1, pp 292–293.
  • MilnerA. (2003), ‘Southeast Asian Studies in Australia’, in ReidA., ed, Southeast Asian Studies: Pacific Perspectives, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, and UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
  • MorseR.A., ed (1984), Southeast Asian Studies: Options for the Future, University Press of America, Lanham, MD.
  • O'ConnorS. ChaloemtiaranaT. AndersonB. (2000), ‘George McTurnan Kahin, 1918–2000’, Indonesia, Vol 69, pp 5–8.
  • PhilpottS. (2000), Rethinking Indonesia: Postcolonial Theory, Authoritarianism and Identity, Macmillan, New York.
  • ReidA. (1974), The Indonesian National Revolution, 1945–1950, Longman, Hawthorn, Victoria.
  • ReidA. DioknoM.S.I. (2003), ‘Completing the circle: Southeast Asian Studies in Southeast Asia’, in ReidA., ed, Southeast Asian Studies: Pacific Perspectives, Arizona State University Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Tempe, AZ, pp 93–107.
  • SchillerA. (1953), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia’, Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol 287, pp 232–233.
  • ScottJ. (1992), ‘Foreword’, in HirschmanC. KeyesC.F. HuttererK.L., eds, Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America, Association of Asian Studies, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 1–8.
  • SmailJ.R.W. (1964), Bandung in the Early Revolution, 1945–1946: A Study in the Social History of the Indonesian Revolution, Modern Indonesian Project, Southeast Asia Program, Department of Asian Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • SokolA.E. (1953), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia by George M. Kahin’, Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol 12, No 4, pp 443–445.
  • SurjomihardjoA. (1976), ‘Penulisan Sejarah Mutakhir’, Kompas.
  • TolentinoR. (2007), ‘Response to The Promise of the Foreign’, Kritika Kultura, Vol 9, pp 112–115.
  • TotanesV. (2010), ‘History of the Filipino people and martial law: A forgotten chapter in the history of a history book, 1960–2010’, Philippine Studies, Vol 58, No 3, pp 313–348.
  • VandenboschA. (1953), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution by George M. Kahin’, Pacific Historical Review, Vol 22, No 2, pp 199–200.
  • van der KroefJ. (1955), ‘Review of Nationalism and Revolution in Asia by George M. Kahin’, Journal of Modern History, Vol 27, No 4, pp 429–430.
  • WertheimW.F. (1953), ‘Review of De Indonesische Quaestie De Wordingsgeschiedenis der Souvereiniteitsoverdracht, by C. Smit, and Nationalism and Revolution by George M. Kahin’, Pacific Affairs, Vol 26, No 3, pp 270–271.
  • WickbergE. (1961), ‘Review of Malolos: The Crisis of the Republic’, Journal of Asian Studies, Vol 21, No 1, pp 92–93.
  • WinichakulT. (2005), ‘Trying to locate Southeast Asia from its navel: Where is Southeast Asian Studies in Thailand?’ in KratoskaP. RabenR. NordholtH.S., eds, Locating Southeast Asia: Geographies of Knowledge and Politics of Space, Singapore University Press, Singapore, pp 113–132.
  • ZafraN. (1956), ‘The Revolt of the Masses: Critique of a book’, Philippine Studies, Vol 4, No 4, pp 493–514.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.