780
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH

Development and Validation of a Science Inquiry Skills Assessment

, &
Pages 73-85 | Received 01 May 2014, Accepted 28 Nov 2014, Published online: 31 Jan 2018

REFERENCES

  • Alonzo, A.C., and Aschbacker, P.R. 2004, March. Value-added? Long assessment of students' scientific inquiry skills . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council of Measurement in Education (NCME) . 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Ault, C.R. 1998. Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 35:189–212.
  • Barstow, D., and Geary, E., eds. 2002. Blueprint for change: Report from the national conference on the revolution in Earth and space science education. Cambridge, MA: Technical Education Research Centers. Available at http://www.earthscienceedrevolution.org/RevEarthSciEd.pdf (accessed 2 January 2015).
  • Beeth, M.E., Cross, L., Pearl, C., Pirro, J., Yagnesak, K., and Kennedy, J. 2001. A continuum for assessing science process knowledge in grades K–6. Electronic Journal of Science Education , 5 (3). Available at: http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/beethetal.html (accessed 19 December 2014).
  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS) . 1962. Processes of science test. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  • Black, P., and Wiliam, D. 2004. The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson, ed., Toward coherence between classroom assessment and accountability, Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, 103 (2):20–50.
  • Blanchard, P., and Lou, Y. 2009. Pathways to inquiry—Earth science: Online tools to strengthen classroom understanding and integration of science inquiry skills. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual International Conference (NARST), Garden Grove, CA, April 17–21.
  • Bond, T.G., and Fox, C.M. 2007. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Burns, J.C., Okey, J.R., and Wise, K.C. 1985. Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 22 (2):169–177.
  • Cooper, B.C., Shepardson, D.P., and Harber, J.M. 2002. Assessments as teaching and research tools in an environmental problem-solving program for in-service teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education , 50 (1):64–71.
  • Dietz, M.A., and George, K.D. 1970. A test to measure problem-solving skills in science of children in grades one, two, and three. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 7 (4):341–351.
  • Dillishaw, F.G., and Okey, J. 1980. Test of the integrated science process skills for secondary science students. Science Education , 64 (5):601–608.
  • Downing, S.M., and Haladyna, T.M., eds. 2006. Handbook of test development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fyffe, D.W. 1971. The development of test items for the integrated science processes: Formulating hypotheses and defining operationally [abstract, Ph.D. dissertation]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6823–A.
  • Germann, P.J., Aram, R., Odom, A.L., and Burke, G. 1996. Student performance on asking questions, identifying variables, and formulating hypotheses. School Science and Mathematics , 96 (4):192–201.
  • Greenfield, T.A. 1998. Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education , 81 (3):259–276.
  • Haladyna, T.M. 1994. Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hatton, J., and Plouffe, P.B. 1997. Science and its ways of knowing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hoffmann, L. 2002. Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction , 12 (4):447–465.
  • Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D. 1993. LISREL 8 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Koballa, T.R., and Chiappetta, E.L. 2005. Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Kutnick, P. 2000. Girls, boys and school achievement: Critical comments on who achieves in schools and under what economic and social conditions achievement takes place: A Caribbean perspective. International Journal of Educational Development , 20 (1):65–84.
  • Lavinghousez, W.E., Jr., 1973. The analysis of the Biology Readiness Scale as a measure of inquiry skills required. Paper presented at BSCS Biology, College of Education, University of Central Florida, February 25, 1973.
  • Lewis, E. 2008. Content is not enough: A history of secondary Earth science teacher preparation with recommendations for today. Journal of Geoscience Education , 56 (5):445–455.
  • Linacre, J.M. 2009. WINSTEPS Rasch measurement and analysis, Version 3.68.2. [Computer software]. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.
  • Louisiana Department of Education . 2003. Louisiana grade level expectations. Available at http://www.louisianabelieves.com/docs/academics/grade-5.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed 19 December 2014).
  • Louisiana Department of Education . 2006. LEAP assessment guide: English language arts, mathematics, science and social studies, grade 8 (LEAP science, grade 8), p. 3–4. Available at http://www.doe.state.la.us/lde/uploads/9844.pdf (accessed 7 December 2014).
  • Ludeman, R.R. 1975. Development of the science processes test (TSPT) [abstract, Ph.D. dissertation]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 203–A.
  • McLeod, R.J., Berkheimer, G.D., Fyffe, D.W., and Robison, R.W. 1975. The development of criterion-validated test items for four integrated science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 12:415–421.
  • Means, B., and Haertel, G. 2002. Technology supports for assessing science inquiry. In National Research Council, eds., Technology and assessment: Thinking ahead—Proceedings of a workshop. Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Molitor, L.L., and George, K.D. 1976. Development of a test of science process skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 13:405–412.
  • National Research Council (NRC) . 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) . 2000. Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) . 2007. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) . 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K–12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) . 2013. The next generational science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (NRC) . 2014. Developing assessment for the next generational science standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Okey, J.R., Wise, K.C., and Burns, J.C. 1982. Test of integrated process skills (TIPS II). Unpublished manuscript, Department of Science Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
  • Orion, N., and Kali, Y. 2005. The effect of an Earth-science learning program on students' scientific thinking skills. Journal of Geoscience Education , 53 (4):387–393.
  • Polit, D., and Beck, C. 2006. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what is being reported? Research in Nursing and Health , 29 (5):489–497.
  • Popham, W.J. 1980. Evaluation in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
  • Radford, D.L., DeTure, L.R., and Doran, R.L. 1992, March. A preliminary assessment of science process skills of preservice elementary teachers. A paper presented at National Association of Researchers in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  • Riley, J.W. 1972. The development and use of a group process test for selected processes of the Science Curriculum Improvement Study [abstract, Ph.D. dissertation]. East Lansing: Michigan State University. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 6200A–6201A.
  • Roberts, R., and Gott, R. 2003. Assessment of biology investigations. Journal of Biological Education , 37 (3):114–121.
  • Science Education for Public Understanding Project (SEPUP) . 1995. Issues, evidence and you: Teacher's guide. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Lawrence Hall of Science.
  • Smith, K.A., and Welliver, P.W. 1990. The development of a science process assessment for fourth grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 27 (8):727–738.
  • Tannenbaum, R.S. 1971. Development of the test of science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 8 (2):123–136.
  • Tobin, K.G., and Capie, W. 1982. Development and validation of a group test of integrated science processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 19 (2):133–141.
  • Walbesser, H.H. 1965. An evaluation model and its application. AAAS Miscellaneous Publication No. 65-9. Washington, DC: The American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Walbesser, H.H., and Carter, H.L. 1970. The effects of test results of changes in task and response format required by altering test administration from an individual to a group form. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 7:1–8.
  • Wenning, C. 2007. Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online , 4 (2):21–24.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.