586
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Refutation Texts for Effective Climate Change Education

, &
Pages 23-34 | Received 09 Jul 2015, Accepted 18 Nov 2016, Published online: 12 Jun 2018

REFERENCES

  • Ariasi, N., and Mason, L. 2011. Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science 39:581–601.
  • Baede, A.P.M., ed. 2015. Annex I. Glossary: IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p. 942. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/glossary/ar4-wg1.pdf (accessed 9 December 2016).
  • Bedford, D. 2010. Agnotology as a teaching tool: Learning climate science by studying misinformation. Journal of Geography 109:159–165.
  • Braasch, J.L.G., Goldman, S.R., and Wiley, J. 2013. The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology 105:561–578.
  • Broughton, S.H., and Sinatra, G.M. 2010. Text in the science classroom: Promoting engagement to facilitate conceptual change. In McKeown, M.G., ed., Bringing reading researchers to life: Essays in honor of Isabelle Beck. New York: Guilford Press, p. 232–256.
  • Chi, M.T.H. 2008. Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In Vosniadou, S., ed., International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge, p. 61–82.
  • Chinn, C. & Buckland, L. 2012. Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and epistemic practices. In Rosengren, K.S., Evans, E.M., Brem, S., and Sinatra, G.M., eds., Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 211–232.
  • Choi, S., Niyogi, D., Shepardson, D.P., and Charusombat, U. 2010, July. Do earth and environmental science textbooks promote middle and high school students' conceptual development about climate change? Textbooks' consideration of students' misconceptions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 91:889–898.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cook, J. 2014. Three perfect grade debunkings of climate misinformation. Skeptical Science. Available at http://skepticalscience.com/Three-perfect-grade-debunkings-climate-misinformation.html (accessed 19 December 2016).
  • Cook, J., Bedford, D., and Mandia, S. 2014. Raising climate literacy through addressing misinformation: Case studies in agnotology-based learning. Journal of Geoscience Education 62:296–306.
  • Cook, J., and Lewandowsky, S. 2011. The debunking handbook. St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland. Available at http://sks;to/debunk (accessed 19 December 2016).
  • Crichton, M. 2004. State of fear. New York: Avon Books, Harper Collins.
  • Diakidoy, I.N., Kendeou, P., and Ioannides, C. 2003. Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28:335–356.
  • Dole, J.A., and Sinatra, G.M. 1998. Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist 33 (2/3):109–128.
  • Dunlop R. 1998. Lay perceptions of global risk: Public views of global warming in cross-national studies. International Sociology 13:473–498.
  • Dutt, V., and Gonzalez, C. 2012. Decisions from experience reduce misconceptions about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32:19–29.
  • Ecker, U.K., Lewandowsky, S., and Tang, D.T. 2011. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory and Cognition 38:1087–1100.
  • Francis, C., Boyes, E. Qualter, A. , and Stanisstreet, M. 1993. Ideas of elementary students about reducing the “Greenhouse effect.” Science Education 77:375–392.
  • Frede, V. 2008. Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods. Advances in Space Research 42:1819–1830.
  • Gautier, C., Deutsch, K., and Rebich, S. 2006. Misconceptions about the greenhouse effect. Journal of Geoscience Education 54:286–395.
  • Gore, A. 2011. 10 common misconceptions about global warming: What you think you know about climate shifts may not be the whole story, after all. Available at http://www.prevention.com/health/healthy-living/10-global-warming-misconceptions (accessed 19 December 2016).
  • Gowda, M., Fox, J., and Magelky, R. 1997. Students' understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78:2232–2240.
  • Guzzetti, B.J. 1990. Effects of textual and instructional manipulations on concept acquisition. Reading Research and Instruction 26:162–188.
  • Guzzetti, B.J., Snyder, T.E., Glass, G.V., and Gamas, W.S. 1993. Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly 28:116–159.
  • Guzzetti, B.J., Williams, W.O., Skeels, S.A., and Wu, S.M. 1997. Influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34:701–719.
  • Hynd, C.R. 2001. Refutation texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research 35:699–714.
  • Hynd, C.R., and Alvermann, D.E. 1986. The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts. Journal of Reading 29:440–446.
  • Hynd, C. R., Alvermann, D.E., and Qian, G. 1997. Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion. Science Education 81:1–27.
  • Hynd, C.R., McWhorter, J., Phares, V., and Suttles, C. 1994. The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics. Journal of Research in Science 31:933–946.
  • IPCC . 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. In Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H.L., eds., Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-faqs.pdf (accessed 9 February 2016).
  • Jacques, P.J., and Dunlap, R.E. 2008. The organization of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics 17:349–385.
  • Keller, J.M. 2006. Part 1: Development of a concept inventory addressing students' beliefs and reasoning difficulties regarding the greenhouse effect; Part II: Distribution of chlorine measured by the Mars Odyssey Gamma Ray Spectrometer [Ph.D dissertation]. Tucson: University of Arizona. p. 446
  • Kendeou, P., Muis, K., and Fulton, S. 2011. Reader and text factors in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading Comprehension 34:365–383.
  • Lombardi, D., and Sinatra, G.M. 2012. College students' perceptions about the plausibility of human-induced climate change. Research in Science Education 42:201–217.
  • Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G.M., and Nussbaum, E.M. 2013. Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction 27:50–62.
  • Mason, L., and Gava, M. 2007. Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In Vosniadou, S., Baltas, A., and Vamvakoussi, X., eds., Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier, p. 165–197.
  • Mason, L., Gava, M., and Boldrin, A. 2008. On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology 100:291–309.
  • McCaffrey, M.S., and Buhr, S.M. 2008. Clarifying climate confusion: Addressing systemic holes, cognitive gaps, and misconceptions through climate literacy. Physical Geography 29:512–528.
  • McKeown, M.G., Beck, I.L., Sinatra, G.M., and Loxterman, J.A. 1992. The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 27:79–93.
  • Miller, J.D. 2012. Climate change: Generation X attitudes, interest, and understanding—The generation X report: A Quarterly Research Report from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth 1 (4):1–7.
  • Nussbaum, E.M. 2008. Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33:345–359.
  • Nussbaum, E.M., Owens, M.C., Sinatra, G.M., Rehmat, A.P., Cordova, J.R., Vesco, J.M., Ahmad, S., Harris, F.C., Jr., Dascalu, S.M. 2015. Losing the Lake: Simulations to promote gains in student knowledge and interest about climate change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10 (5):789–811.
  • Nussbaum, E.M., Winsor, D.L., Aqui, Y.M., and Poliquin, A.M. 2007. Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2:479–500.
  • Piaget, J. 1952. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.
  • Plutzer, E., McCaffrey, M., Hannah, A.L., Rosenau, J., Berbeco, M., and Reid, A.H. 2016. Climate confusion among U.S. teachers. Science 351 (6274):664–665.
  • Proctor, R.N. 2008. Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In Proctor, R.N., and Schiebinger, L., eds., Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance , Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, p. 1–33.
  • Real Climate . 2016. Real climate: Climate science from climate scientists. Available at http://www.realclimate.org/ (accessed 19 December 2016).
  • Rebich, S., and Gautier, C. 2005. Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:355–365.
  • Shymansky, J.A., Yore, L.D., Treagust, D.F., Thiele, R.V., Harrison, A., Waldrip, B.G., Stocklmayer, S.M., and Venville, G. 1997. Examining the construction process: A study of changes in level 10 students' understanding of classical mechanics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34:571–593.
  • Sinatra, G.M., and Broughton, S.H. 2011. Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly 46:374–393.
  • Sinatra, G.M., Kardash, C.M., Taasoobshirazi, G., and Lombardi, D. 2012. Promoting attitude change and expressed willingness to take action toward climate change in college students. Instructional Science 40:1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9166-5
  • Skeptical Science . 2015. Skeptical Science: Getting skeptical about global warming skepticism. Available at http://skepticalscience.com/ (accessed 15 August 2015).
  • Skurnik, I., Yoon, C.M., Park, D., and Schwarz, N. 2005. How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research 31:713–724.
  • Taber, C.S., and Lodge, M. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50:755–769.
  • Thijs, G.D. 1992. Evaluation of an introductory course on “force” considering students' preconceptions. Science Education 76:155–174.
  • Tippett, C.D. 2004. Conceptual change: The power of refutation text [M.A. thesis]. Victoria, Canada: University of Victoria. p. 208.
  • Tippett, C.D. 2010. Refutation text in science education: A Review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 8:951–970.
  • U.S. Global Change Research Program—Climate Change Science Program . 2009. Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate science. Available at http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/Literacy/ (accessed 9 February 2012).
  • Van den Broek, P., and Kendeou, P. 2008. Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22:335–351.
  • Vosniadou, S., ed. 2008. International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge.
  • Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W.F. 1992. Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology 24:535–585.
  • World Meteorological Organization . 2016. World Meteorological Organization: Weather, climate, water. What is climate? Available at http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/ccl/faqs.php (accessed 19 December 2016).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.