Publication Cover
Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Journal canadien de télédétection
Volume 38, 2012 - Issue 1
115
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Monitoring the state of a large boreal forest region in eastern Canada through the use of multitemporal classified satellite imagery

, &
Pages 91-108 | Received 06 Apr 2011, Accepted 07 Mar 2012, Published online: 04 Jun 2014

References

  • Banko, G. 1998. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data and of methods including remote sensing data in forest inventory. International Institution for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. IIASSA Interim Report No. IR-98-081.
  • Beaubien, J., Cihlar, J., Simard, G., and Latifovic, R. 1999. Land cover from multiple thematic mapper scenes using a new enhancement-classification methodology. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 104, No. D22, pp. 27909–27920. doi: 10.1029/1999JD900243.
  • Bergeron, Y., Gauthier, S., Flannigan, M., and Kafka, V. 2004. Fire regime at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in northwestern Quebec. Ecology, Vol. 85, No. 7, pp. 1916–1932. doi: 10.1890/02-0716.
  • Bergeron, Y., Cyr, D., Drever, C.R., Flannigan, M., Gauthier, S., Kneeshaw, D., Lauzon, E., Leduc, A., Le Goff, H., Lesieur, D., and Logan, K. 2006. Past, current and future fire frequency in Quebec's commercial forests: implications for the cumulative effects of harvesting and fire on age-class structures and natural disturbance-based management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 2737–2744. doi: 10.1139/x06-177.
  • Bouchard, M., and Pothier, D. 2011. Long-term influence of fire and harvesting on boreal forest age structure and forest composition in eastern Québec. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 261, No. 4, pp. 811–820. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.020.
  • Boudreau, J., Nelson, R.F., Margolis, H.A., Beaudoin, A., Guindon, L., and Kimes, D.S. 2008. Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Quebec. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 112, No. 10, pp. 3876–3890. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.003.
  • CCFM. 1992. Sustainable Forests: A Canadian Commitment. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Canadian Council of Forest Ministers. Ottawa.
  • CCFM. 1997. Criteria and indicators of sustainable Forest Management in Canada: Technical report [Online], Report No. Fo75-3/6-1997E, pp.1–145. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers. Ottawa. Available from <http://www.dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/ Collection/Fo75-3-6-1997E.pdf>.
  • CCFM. 2006. Canada's Boreal Forest. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers [online], pp. 1–8. Available from <http://www.sfmcanada.org/english/pdf/IFPP_ Bro_US_Eng(hres).pdf> [accessed July 2011].
  • Chavez, P.S. 1988. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 459–479. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90019-3.
  • Cihlar, R., Beaubien, J., Xiao, O., Chen, J. and Li, Z. Land cover of the BOREAS Region from AVHRR and Landsat data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 1997. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 163-175.
  • Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling techniques (3rd Edition). John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Collins, J.B., and Woodcock, C.E. 1996. An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 66–77. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00233-2.
  • Coulombe, G., Huot, J., Arsenault, J., Bauce, E., Bernard, J.-T., Bouchard, A., Liboiron, M.-A., and Szaraz, G. 2004. Rapport de la Commission d’étude sur la gestion de la forêt publique québécoise. [Online], pp. 1–307. Available from <http://www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/publications/forets/consultation/rapport-coulombe.pdf> [accessed April 2011].
  • CTI. 2000. Canadian Digital Elevation Data: Standards and Specifications. Centre for Topographic Information, Natural Resources Canada, Geomatics Canada [online], pp. 1–15. Available from: < http://www.geobase.ca/doc/specs/pdf/NRCAN_CDED_specs.pdf> [accessed April 2011].
  • Czaplewski, R.L. and Patterson, P.L. Classification accuracy for stratification with remotely sensed data. Forest Science. 2003. Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 402-408.
  • Desclée, B., Bogaert, P. and Defourny, P. Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2006. Vol. 102, No. 1–2, pp. 1-11.
  • Du, Y., Teillet, P.M., and Cihlar, J. 2002. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 123–134. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00029-9.
  • Duinker, P.N. 2000. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada: progress and problems integrating Science and Politics at the local level. pp. 5-28. In Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at the forest management unit level. Franc, A., Laroussinie, O., and Karjalainen T. (eds.). Nancy, France, 21–25 March 2000. EFI Proceedings. Vol. 38, pp. 7–27.
  • Espírito-Santo, F.D.B., Shimabukuro, Y.E., and Kuplich, T.M. 2005. Mapping forest successional stages following deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia using multi-temporal Landsat images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 635–642. doi: 10.1080/0143116042000274078.
  • Fenton, N., and Bergeron, Y. 2007. Sphagnum community change after partial harvest in black spruce boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 242, No. 1, pp. 24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.028.
  • Foody, G.M. 2010. Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 114, No. 10, pp. 2271–2258. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.05.003.
  • Foody, G.M., Palumbinskas, G., Lucas, R.M., Curran, P.J., and Honzak, M. 1996. Identifying terrestrial carbon sinks: classification of successional stages in regenerating tropical forest from Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 205–216. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(95)00196-4.
  • Franklin, J., Woodcock, C.E. and Warbington, R. Digital vegetation maps of forest lands in California: integrating satellite imagery, GIS modeling, and field data in support of resource management. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 2000. Vol. 66, No. 10, pp. 1209-1217.
  • Franklin, S.E., Lavigne, M.B., Wulder, M.A., and McCaffrey, T.M. 2002. Large-area forest structure change detection: An example. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 588–592. doi: 10.5589/m02-048.
  • Fraser, R.H., and Li, Z. 2002. Estimating fire parameters in boreal forest using SPOT VEGETATION. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 95–110. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00027-5.
  • Fraser, R.H., Olthof, I., and Pouliot, D. 2009. Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada's national parks. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 113, No. 7, pp 1397–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.019.
  • Gachet, S., Leduc, A., Bergeron, Y., Nguyen-Xuan, T., and Tremblay, F. 2007. Understory vegetation of boreal tree plantations: Differences in relation to previous land use and natural forests. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 442, No. 1, pp. 49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.037.
  • Gauthier, S., Vaillancourt, M-A., Leduc, A., De Grandpré, L., Kneeshaw, D., Morin, H., Drapeau, P., and Bergeron, Y. 2009. Ecosystem Management in the Boreal Forest. Presses de l'Université du Québec, Québec.
  • Gillis, M.-D., Omule, A.Y. and Brierley, T. Monitoring Canada's forest: The national forest inventory. Forestry Chronicle. 2005. Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 214-221.
  • Gouvernement du Québec. 1985–2005. Ressources et industries forestières, portrait statistiques, éditions 1985 à 2005 [online]. Available from <http://www.mrn.gouv.qc.ca/forets/connaissances/connaissances-statistiques-anterieures.jsp> [accessed April 2011].
  • Hall, F.G., Botkin, D.B., Strebel, D.E., Woods, K.D., and Goetz, S.J. 1991. Large-scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing. Ecology, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 628–640. doi: 10.2307/2937203.
  • Healey, S.P., Cohen, W.B., Zhiqiang, Y., and Krankina, O.N. 2005. Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.009.
  • Hely, C., Flannigan, M.D. and Bergeron, Y. Modeling tree mortality following wildfire in the southeastern Canadian mixed-wood boreal forest. Forest Science. 2003. Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 566-576.
  • Lunetta, R.S., Knight, J.F., Ediriwickrema, J., Lyon, J.G., and Worthy, L.D. 2006. Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 105, No. 2, pp. 142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.018.
  • Markham, B. and Barker, J. Landsat MSS and TM post calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectances and at satellite temperature. EOSAT Landsat Technical Notes 1 . 1986. Vol. , pp. 3-8.
  • Messier, C., Fortin, M.-J., Schmiegelow, F., Doyon, F., Cumming, S.G., Kimmins, J.P., Seely, B., Welham, C., and Nelson, J. 2003. Modelling tools to assess the sustainability of forest management scenarios. In Burton, P.J., Messier, C., Smith, D.W., and Adamowicz, W.L. (eds). Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest. NRC Research Press. Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 531–580.
  • MRNF. 1997. Critères et indicateurs d'un aménagement forestier durable- plan de mise en valeur. Ministère des Ressources Naturelles du Québec. Québec. Document de consultation No. 9710.
  • MRNF. 2002. Rapport sur l’état des forêts québécoises 1995–1999, nos forêts. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune [online], pp. 1–8. Available from <http://www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/publications/forets/quebec/Rapport-synt.pdf> [accessed April 2011].
  • MRNF. 2004. Portrait forestier des régions de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue (AT) et du nord-du-Quebec (NQ). Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune. Document d'information sur la gestion de la forêt publique Direction régionale de l'AT-NQ [Online], pp. 1–79. Available from <http://www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/publications/forets/portraits-forestiers/portraitforestier08-10.pdf> [accessed April 2011].
  • Natural Resources Canada. 2004. The State of Canada's Forests 2003-2004. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service [Online], pp. 1–79. Available from <http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/24985.pdf> [accessed April 2011].
  • Olthof, I., Pouliot, D., Latifovic, R. and Chen, W. Recent (1986–2006) vegetation-specific NDVI trends in Northern Canada from satellite data. Arctic. 2008. Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 381-394.
  • Peddle, D.R., Johnson, R.L., Cihlar, J., Latifovic, R. 2004. Large area forest classification and biophysical parameter estimation using the 5-Scale canopy reflectance model in Multiple-Forward-Mode. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 252–263. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2002.08.001.
  • Perron, N., Bélanger, L., and Vaillancourt, M.-A. 2008. Organisation spatiale des peuplements et de la forêt résiduelle sous régimes de feu et de coupes. Dans Aménagement écosystémique en forêt boréale, Chapitre 6. Gauthier et al. (eds). Presses de l'Université du Québec. Québec. pp. 137–163.
  • Ridd, M.K., and Liu, L. 1998. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote sensing of environment, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 95–100. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00112-0.
  • Riley, L.F. 1995. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 67–70. doi: 10.1007/BF01182819.
  • Robitaille, A. 1989. Cartographie des districts écologiques. Normes et techniques. Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources, Service de l'inventaire forestier, Division Écologique, Québec. pp. 1–111.
  • Sachs, D.L., Sollins, P., and Cohen, W.B. 1998. Detecting Landscape changes in the interior of British Columbia from 1975 to 1992 using satellite imagery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 23–36. doi: 10.1139/x97-186.
  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2001. Assessment, Conservation and Sustainable Use of Forest Biodiversity. CBD Technical Series No. 3, Montréal [Online], pp. 1–130. Available from <http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-03.pdf> [accessed April 2011].
  • Singh, A., and Harrison, A. 1985. Standardized principal components. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 883–896. doi: 10.1080/01431168508948511.
  • Sivanpillai, R., Smith, C.T., Srinivasan, R., Messina, M., and Wu, X.B. 2005. Estimating regional forest cover in east Texas using Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM+) data. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 218, No. 1–3, pp. 342–352. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.033.
  • Théau, J., Peddle, D.R. and Duguay, C.R. Mapping lichen in a caribou habitat of Northern Quebec, Canada, using an enhancement-classification method and spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2004. Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 232-243.
  • US Geological Survey. 2005. Landsat: A Global Land-Observing Program, Series Fact Sheet number 2005–3130. pp. 1–4.
  • Valeria, O., Laamrani, A., Beaudoin, A., Côté, S., and Simard, S. 2007. Use of multi-temporal satellite imagery over large territories for monitoring the state of the boreal forest of north-western Quebec, Canada. In Proceedings of ForestSAT 2007, Montpellier, France, 5th–7th November.
  • van Lier, O.R., Lutherb, J.E., Leckiec, D.G., and Bowersa, W.W. 2011. Development of large-area land cover and forest change indicators using multi-sensor Landsat imagery: Application to the Humber River Basin, Canada. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 819–829. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.05.019.
  • Verbyla, D.L., and Hammond, T.O. 1995. Conservative bias in classification accuracy assessment due to pixel- by-pixel comparison of classified images with reference grids. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 581–587. doi: 10.1080/01431169508954424.
  • Wilson, E.H., and Sader, S.A. 2002. Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 385–396. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00318-2.
  • Wulder, M.A, Skakun, R., Kurz, W., and White, J.C. 2004. Estimating time since forest disturbance using segmented landsat ETM+ Imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 93, No. 1–2, pp. 179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.07.009.
  • Wulder, M.A., Franklin, S.E., White, J.C.; Linke, J., and Magnussen, S. 2006. An accuracy assessment framework for large-area land cover classification products derived from medium-resolution satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 663–683. doi: 10.1080/01431160500185284.
  • Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Magnussen, S., and McDonald, S. 2007. Validation of a large area land cover product using purpose-acquired airborne video. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.012.
  • Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Cranny, M., Hall, R.J., Luther, J.E., Beaudoin, A., Goodenough, D.G., and Dechka, J.A. 2008a. Monitoring Canada's forests. Part 1: Completion of the EOSD land cover project. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 549–562. doi: 10.5589/m08-066.
  • Wulder, M.A., Butson, C.R., and White, J.C. 2008b. Cross-sensor change detection over a forested landscape: Options to enable continuity of medium spatial resolution measures. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 796–809. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.06.013.
  • Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Han, T., Coops, N.C., Cardille, J.A., Holland, T., and Grills, D. 2008c. Monitoring Canada's forests. Part 2: National forest fragmentation and pattern. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 563–584. doi: 10.5589/m08-081.
  • Wulder, M.A., Ortlepp, S.M., White, J.C., and Maxwell, S. 2008d. Evaluation of Landsat-7 SLC-off image products for forest change detection. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 93–99. doi: 10.5589/m08-020.
  • Yuan, D., and Elvidge, C. 1998. NALC land cover change detection pilot study: Washington D.C. area experiments. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 166–178. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00068-6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.