475
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Partie I: À propos des concepts / Part I: Concerning Concepts

Leisure, Culture and Lifestyle

Pages 359-376 | Published online: 16 Jul 2013

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2000). Poststructural feminist theories of representing others: A response to the “crisis” in leisure studies’ discourse. Leisure Studies, 19 (3): 127–45.
  • Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. London: Heinemann.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). A diagram of social position and life-style. Media, Culture and Society, 2 (1), 255–259.
  • Chaney, D. (1987). Review of Rojek’s Capitalism and leisure theory and Clarke and Critcher’s The devil makes workSociological Review, 35 (1): 200–2.
  • Chaney, D. (1996). Lifestyles. London: Routledge.
  • Christensen, J.E (1988). Statistical and methodological issues in leisure research. In L.A. Barnett (ed.) Research about Leisure: Past, Present and Future, p. 175–192. Champaign, IL.:Sagamore Publishing.
  • Coalter, F. (1999). Leisure science and leisure studies: the challenge of meaning. In E. L. Jackson and T. L. Burton (eds), Leisure studies: Prospects for the twenty-first century, p. 507–22. State College, PA: Venture Publishing,
  • Clarke, J. and Critcher, C. (1985). The devil makes work: Leisure in capitalist Britain. London: Macmillan.
  • Critcher, C. (1989). A communication in response to Leisure, lifestyle and status: A pluralist framework for analysis. Leisure Studies, 8 (2): 159–62.
  • Critcher, C. (1992). Is there anything on the box? Leisure studies and media studies. Leisure Studies, 11 (2): 91–122.
  • Davis, J. A. (1955). Living rooms as symbols of status: A study in social judgement. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
  • Deem, R. (1986). All work and no play? The sociology of women and leisure. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  • Durantaye, M. de la (1988Towards multidisciplinary research on leisure and life styles: an holistic approach. Paper to the World Leisure and Recreation Association congress, Free Time, Leisure and Society”, Lake Louise, Canada, May.
  • Feldman, S. D. Thielbar, G. W. (eds)(1972). Lifestyles: Diversity in American society. Boston: Little Brown and Co.
  • Filipcova, B. (ed.) (1972 ). Special issue on socialist life style. Society and Leisure (Prague Series) No. 3.
  • Filipcova, B., Glyptis, S. and Tokarski, W. (eds) (1990). Life styles: Theories, concepts, methods and results of life style research in international perspective. Research Committee 13 of the International Sociological Association, Prague: Institute for Philosophy and Sociology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences (2 Volumes).
  • Gans, H. J. (1974). Popular culture and high culture. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gattas, J. T., RobertsK, Smitz-Schercher, R. Tokarski W and Vitanyi, I. (1986). Leisure and life-styles: Towards a research agenda. Society and Leisure, 9 (2): 529–539
  • Glyptis, S. (1981). Leisure life-styles. Regional Studies, l5(5), 311–326.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
  • Gunter, B. G. Gunter, N. C. ( 1980) Leisure styles: A conceptual framework for modern leisure. Sociological Quarterly, 21(2), 316–374
  • Jarvie, G. and Maguire, J. (1994). Sport and leisure in social thought. London: Routledge.
  • Junker, B. H. (1955). Room compositions and life styles: A sociological study in living rooms in contemporary dwellings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
  • Kelly, J.R. (1980). Leisure and quality: beyond the quantitative barrier in research. In T.L. Goodale and P.A.Witt (eds) Recreation and Leisure: Issues in an Era of Change, p. 300–314. State College PA. : Venture.
  • Kelly, J. R. (1983). Leisure styles: A hidden core. Leisure Sciences, 5 (4): 321–338
  • Laumann, E. O. House, J. S. (1970). Living room styles and social attributes: the patterning of material artefacts in a modern urban community. In E. O. Laumann et al. (eds) The Logic of Social Hierarchies, p. 189–203. Chicago: Markham.
  • Maccannell, D. (1976). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. London: Macmillan.
  • Marshall, H. (1973). Suburban life style: a contribution to the debate. In L. H. Masotti and J. K. Hadden (eds) The Urbanization of the Suburbs, (Urban Affairs Annual Reviews Vol. 7). p. 123–148. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Miles, S. (2000). Youth lifestyles in a changing world. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Miller, P. J. Sjöberg, G. (1973). Urban middle-class life styles in transition. Journal of Applied Behavioural Sciences, 9(1), 144–161.
  • Mommaas, H (1990). Leisure, culture and lifestyle: Veblen, Weber and Simmel revisited. Paper to the International Sociological Association XIIth Congress of Sociology Madrid, July.
  • Moorhouse, H. F. (1989). Models of work, models of leisure. In C. Rojek (ed) Leisure for Leisure, London: Macmillan p. 15–35
  • Ouellet, G. (1981). Déterminants psychologiques du style de vie de loisir. In T. L. Burton Third Canadian Congress on Leisure Research, p. 999–1023. Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta,
  • Page, A. L. Clelland, D. A. (1978). The Kanawha County textbook controversy: A study of the politics of life style concern. Social Forces, 57 (1): 265–281.
  • Paré, J.-L. (1985). Loisir et styles de vie: modèles pour des approches explicites et diversifiées en recherche. Loisir et Société, 8 (2): 405–23.
  • Paré, J.-L. (1992). Loisir, styles de vie et modes de vie : Problématique et méthodologies; analyse critique de Filipcova, Glyptis et Tokarski ( 1989, Loisir et Société, 15(2), 659–74
  • Paré, J.-L. (1993). Loisir, styles de vie et modes de vie : État de la documentation et de la recherche en 1993. Loisir et Société, 16(2), 462–71.
  • Parker, S. 1971, The future of work and leisure. London: Palladin.
  • Proctor, C. (1962). Dependence of recreation participation on background characteristics. Appendix A of Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission National Recreation Survey, Study Report l9, p. 77–94. Washington D.C.: ORRRC.
  • Pryce, K. (1979). Endless pressure: A study of West Indian life-styles in Bristol. Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin.
  • Rapoport, R. Rapoport, R. N. (1975). Leisure and the family life-cycle. London: Routledge.
  • Roberts, K. (1978). Contemporary society and the growth of leisure. London: Longman.
  • Roberts, K. (1999). Leisure in contemporary society. Wallingford, Oxon.: CABI Publishing.
  • Rojek, C. (1985). Capitalism and leisure theory. London: Tavistock.
  • Rojek, C. (1995). Decentring leisure: Rethinking leisure theory. London: Sage.
  • Rojek, C. (1997). Leisure theory: retrospect and prospect. Society and Leisure, 20 (2): 383–400.
  • Rojek, C. (2000). Leisure and culture. Basingstoke, Hants.: Macmillan.
  • Scheys, M. (1987). The power of life style. Loisir et Société, 10 (2): 249–266.
  • Scraton, S. and Talbot, M. (1989). A response to “Leisure, lifestyle and status: a pluralist framework for analysis”. Leisure Studies, 8 (1): 155–158.
  • Settle, J.G. (1977). Leisure in the North West: A tool for forecasting. London: Sports Council.
  • Simmel, G. (1976). The style of life (l) and (2). In P. Lawrence, Georg Simmel: Sociologist and European, p. l73–222. London: Nelson.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1981). Lifestyle and social structure: Concepts, definitions, analyses. New York: Academic Press
  • Sue, R. (1986). Modes de vie et changement social: contribution à une approche conceptuelle et méthodologique. Loisir et Société, 9 (2): 239–256.
  • Toffler, A. (1970). A diversity of life styles. Chapter14 of Future Shock. London: Pan.
  • Tokarski, W. (1984). Interrelationships between leisure and life styles. WLRA Journal, 26(l), 9–l3.
  • Tokarski, W. (1985). Editorial: lifestyles. World Leisure and Recreation, 27(2), 5–6.
  • Veal, A. J. (1987). The leisure forecasting tradition. In Leisure and the Future, p. 125–156. London: Allen & Unwin,
  • Veal, A. J. (1989). Leisure, lifestyle and status: A pluralistic framework for analysis. Leisure Studies, 8(2), 141–154.
  • Veal, A. J. (1989a). Lifestyle , leisure and pluralism – a response.Leisure Studies, 8 (3): 213–218.
  • Veal, A. J. (1993). The concept of lifestyle: A review. Leisure Studies, 12 (4): 233–252 (also available in Veal, 2000).
  • Veal, A. J. (1998). Leisure studies, pluralism and social democracy. Leisure Studies, 17 (4): 249–268.
  • Veal, A. J. (2000). Lifestyle and leisure: A review and annotated bibliography. School of Leisure, Sport and Tourism, University of Technology Sydney, On-line Bibliography 8, at: www.business.uts.edu.au/leisure/research/bibs.html.
  • Veal, A. J. Lynch, R. (2013). Austalian Leisure, 2ndSydney: Longman
  • Wearing, B. (1990). Beyond the ideology of motherhood: Leisure as resistance. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 26(1), 36–58.
  • Wearing, B. (1998). Leisure and feminist theory. London: Sage.
  • Wearing, B. and Wearing S. (1996). Refocussing the tourist experience: The “Flaneur” and the “choraster”. Leisure Studies, 15 (4): 229–44
  • Wells, W. D. 1974). Life style and psychographics. Chicago: American Marketing Ass.
  • Young, M. Willmott, P. (1973). The symmetrical family. London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.