Topography-correlated atmospheric signal mitigation for InSAR applications in the Tibetan plateau based on global atmospheric models

Yuqing Wanga Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Geodynamics and Geohazards, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat‐sen University, Zhuhai, China;b Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-7468 View further author information

Ling Changc Department of Earth Observation Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

Wanpeng Fenga Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Geodynamics and Geohazards, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat‐sen University, Zhuhai, China;b Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

Sergey Samsonovd Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observations, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6798-4847 View further author information

Wenjun Zhenga Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Geodynamics and Geohazards, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat‐sen University, Zhuhai, China;b Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, ChinaView further author information

Topography-correlated atmospheric signal mitigation for InSAR applications in the Tibetan plateau based on global atmospheric models

IJRS_supplemental_file.docx

Figure S7. The corrected interferogram of 14 February 2019–26 February 2019 in R1 based on ERA-I.

Figure S6. The corrected coseismic interferogram of 23 September 2018–28 December 2018 in R1 based on ERA-I.

Figure S5. (a)(i)-(a)(ii) SD and SD reduction rates of Profile DD’ of the interferograms in R2 in ascending track 129 with positive correction effectiveness of ERA5, MERRA2 and GACOS; (b)(i)-(b)(ii) as (a)(i)-(a)(ii) but for descending track 34.

Figure S4.

Figure S3. The spatial sampling rates of ERA5 (0.25° × 0.25°), MERRA2 (0.625°×0.5°) and ERA-I (0.75°×0.75°).

Figure S2.

Figure S1.

Related Research Data

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Topography-correlated atmospheric signal mitigation for InSAR applications in the Tibetan plateau based on global atmospheric models

IJRS_supplemental_file.docx

Figure S7. The corrected interferogram of 14 February 2019–26 February 2019 in R1 based on ERA-I.

Figure S6. The corrected coseismic interferogram of 23 September 2018–28 December 2018 in R1 based on ERA-I.

Figure S5. (a)(i)-(a)(ii) SD and SD reduction rates of Profile DD’ of the interferograms in R2 in ascending track 129 with positive correction effectiveness of ERA5, MERRA2 and GACOS; (b)(i)-(b)(ii) as (a)(i)-(a)(ii) but for descending track 34.

Figure S4.

Figure S3. The spatial sampling rates of ERA5 (0.25° × 0.25°), MERRA2 (0.625°×0.5°) and ERA-I (0.75°×0.75°).

Figure S2.

Figure S1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related Research Data

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date