About this journal
Aims and scope
Security Studies publishes leading scholarship in the field of international security, broadly construed. The journal is wedded to no particular theoretical paradigm, epistemological stance, or methodological approach. Security Studies embraces the field in all its intellectual diversity, welcoming contributions to scholarly knowledge from the plural communities and research traditions that constitute the field. Its articles provide an answer to an explanatory puzzle, present original empirical research (using a range of methods), critically engage core theoretical concepts, or otherwise intervene in disciplinary debates. Security Studies articles' analysis is rigorous in terms appropriate to their methodological approach.
Security Studies welcomes scholars from all disciplines, and its articles do not conform to narrow disciplinary norms. However, authors might find it helpful to understand what Security Studies is not . Although Security Studies articles are often motivated by policy questions and often have policy implications - and Security Studies encourages authors to spell those out - Security Studies is not a policy journal; its articles are directed primarily toward generating scholarly knowledge, rather than arguing for a particular policy. Similarly, although Security Studies has traditionally been, and remains, sympathetic to careful and deep historical research, it is not a history journal; Security Studies articles engage with historical materials to answer analytical questions and address analytically-framed debates. Articles that are purely descriptive - for instance, of a particular region's contemporary or past security challenges, of a government's decision-making process, of a historical case - will not pass muster. Articles published in Security Studies will be explicit about their central analytical pivot and be framed around those analytical questions and contributions.
A successful submission to Security Studies will generally:
- Establish the significance of its central analytical question(s). Successful submissions will effectively articulate the article's stakes - theoretical, empirical, political, and/or normative;
- Clearly specify the theoretical framework used for analysis, referencing the necessary literature(s);
- Adhere to rigorous methodical standards, as understood by the intellectual tradition within which the article is situated, in setting forth the evidentiary bases of its argument;
- Engage with work outside of its immediate field of research and approach to scholarly inquiry. Authors who publish in Security Studies are speaking to the field as a whole, not just to scholars working within their specific area and research tradition;
- Spell out the implications of their findings for further research.
For complete guidance from the Editors, please consult the Security Studies website and especially its guidance for authors.
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone editorial screening and double-anonymous peer review by at least two independent referees.
Publication Office:
Taylor & Francis, Inc., 530 Walnut Street, Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106
Journal metrics
Usage
- 276K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 2.2 (2023) Impact Factor
- Q1 Impact Factor Best Quartile
- 3.3 (2023) 5 year IF
- 2.7 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q1 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 1.099 (2023) SNIP
- 0.650 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 9 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 75 days avg. from submission to first post-review decision
- 98 days avg. from acceptance to online publication
- 11% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Editor-in-Chief
Ron Hassner, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Associate EditorsFiona Adamson, SOAS University of London, UK
Seva Gunitsky, University of Toronto, Canada
Janet Lewis , George Washington University, USA
Roseanne McManus, Penn State University, USA
Nicholas L. Miller, Dartmouth College, USA
Andrew Phillips, University of Queensland, Australia
Managing Editor
Lauren Barden-Hair, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Editorial Board
Co-chairs
Michael C. Desch, University of Notre Dame, USA
William C. Wohlforth, Dartmouth College, USA
Members
Aisha Ahmad, University of Toronto, Canada
Thierry Balzacq, Sciences Po, France
Tarak Barkawi, London School of Economics, UK
Duncan Bell, University of Cambridge, UK
Willem Boettcher, North Carolina State University, USA
Risa Brooks, Marquette University, USA
Jonathan D. Caverley, United States Naval War College, USA
Erica Chenoweth, Harvard University, USA
Bridget Coggins, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Timothy Crawford, Boston College, USA
James W. Davis, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Alexander B. Downes, George Washington University, USA
David Edelstein, Georgetown University, USA
Jennifer L. Erickson, Boston College, USA
Theo Farrell, King's College, London, UK
M. Taylor Fravel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Francis J. Gavin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Alexandra Gheciu, University of Ottawa, Canada
Eugene Gholz, University of Notre Dame, USA
Stacie Goddard, Wellesley College, USA
Kelly M. Greenhill, Tufts University and Harvard Kennedy School, USA
Mark Haas, Duquesne University, USA
Lene Hansen, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Cullen Hendrix, University of Denver, USA
Stephanie Hofmann, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Switzerland
Yuen Foong Khong, University of Oxford, UK
Helen Kinsella, University of Minnesota, USA
Jonathan Kirshner, Boston College, USA
Ronald R. Krebs, University of Minnesota, USA
Sarah Kreps, Cornell University, USA
Keir A. Lieber, Georgetown University, USA
Jennifer Lind, Dartmouth College, USA
Steven Lobell, University of Utah, USA
Benny Miller, University of Haifa, Israel
Jennifer Mitzen, The Ohio State University, USA
Nuno Monteiro (1971-2021), Yale University, USA
Vipin Narang, MIT, USA
John M. Owen IV, University of Virginia, USA
Daryl G. Press, Dartmouth College, USA
Brian Rathbun, University of Southern Californa, Dornsife, USA
Will Reno, Northwestern University, USA
Sebastian Rosato, University of Notre Dame, USA
Joshua Rovner, American University, USA
Chiara Ruffa, Sciences Po, France
Randall Schweller, The Ohio State University, USA
Jeremi Suri, University of Texas, Austin, USA
Jeffrey Taliaferro, Tufts University, USA
Shiping Tang, Fudan University, China
Jakana Thomas, University of California San Diego, USA
Alexander Thompson, The Ohio State University, USA
Monica Duffy Toft, Tufts University, USA
Keren Yarhi-Milo, Columbia University, USA
Andrew Yeo, Catholic University, USA
Production Editor
Adriane Ver Aquino
Updated 27-09-2023
Abstracting and indexing
Open access
Security Studies is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
News, offers and calls for papers
News and offers
5 issues per year
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in Security Studies?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in Security Studies.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors, make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors