About this journal
Aims and scope
The New Review of Academic Librarianship publishes reviews, research, critiques and exemplar case studies on substantive topics relevant to those providing library and information services to academic communities. Emphasis is placed on establishing the relevance and applicability of theory and/or research for the academic library practitioner. The intention is to disseminate developments and encourage discussion on the future role of academic libraries and their services.
The scope of the Journal covers, but is not restricted to, developments in the following:
- Scholarly communication (including institutional repositories)
- Support for learning & research
- Information literacy
- Deployment of information and communication technologies
- Changing use of physical space
- Performance monitoring and service evaluation
- Human resources and workforce development
- Collection management
- Conservation and preservation
- Collaboration and co-operation
- Electronic content procurement
- National/international policy on higher education library and information provision
The Journal accepts original papers which significantly contribute to the knowledge base of academic librarianship. Submissions based on theory and research that advance the understanding of the development of high quality academic library and information management practices are welcomed. Perspectives are encouraged from academic library practitioners, educationalists involved with academic libraries and others with relevant knowledge and interest.
Peer Review Policy: Manuscripts submitted to this journal undergo editorial screening and peer review by anonymous reviewers.
Publication office: Taylor & Francis, Inc., 530 Walnut Street, Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 71K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 3.4 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- Q2 CiteScore Best Quartile
- 1.591 (2023) SNIP
- 0.616 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 0 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 17 days avg. from acceptance to online publication
- 25% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Editor-In-Chief:
Leo Appleton
Senior University Teacher
Information School
University of Sheffield
Sheffield, UK
[email protected]
Associate Editors:
Damyanti Patel
Resources Officer
University of Warwick Library
Conventry, UK
mailto:[email protected]
Claire Sewell
House of Commons Library, London, UK
mailto:[email protected]
Tim Schlak
Dean
University Library
Robert Morris University
Moon, PA, USA
[email protected]
Editorial Board:
Caitlin Bagley - Gonzaga University, USA
Jessica Bates - Ulster University, UK
Michelle Blake - Universiy of Waikato, New Zealand
Marilyn Clarke - Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, UK
Miriam Conteh-Morgan - University of Sierra Leone
Gracian Chimwaza - ITOCA Information Training & Outreach Centre for Africa, South Africa
Sheila Corrall - University of Pittsburgh, USA
Olaf Eigenbrodt - University of Hamburg, Germany
Renee Jefferson - The Citadel, USA
Liz Jolly - British Library, UK
Sanjay Kataria - Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, India
Charlotte Kiger-Price - Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Taiwo Lasisi - Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Jimmy McKee - Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Boris Michev - University of Pittsburgh, USA
Hugh Murphy - Maynooth University, Ireland
Steve O'Connor - Information Exponential, Australia
Mistuhiro Oda - Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan
Eva Ortol - Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain
Stephen Pinfield - The University of Sheffield, UK
Andrew Preater - Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
Chutima Sacchanand - Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Thailand
Fiona Salisbury - Western Sydney University, Australia
Manju Shivalli - Smt Parvatibai Chowgule College, India
Lindiwe Soyizwapi - University of Pretoria, South Africa
J. K. Vijayakumar - America University of Antigua College of Medicine, Antigua
Tim Wales - Cranfield University, UK
Geoff Walton - Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
Wendy White - University of Southampton, UK
Elizabeth Williams - University of Edinburgh, UK
Abstracting and indexing
New Review of Academic Librarianship is abstracted and indexed in the following services: EBSCOhost Online Research Databases; Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI); Inspec; TOC Premier; H.W. Wilson; Elsevier BV; Scopus; OCLC; ArticleFirst; Ovid; ProQuest; Periodicals Index Online; and Taylor & Francis.
All Library & Information Science journals are subject to the Zero Embargo Green OA Policy, which states that authors retain copyright of their article & are entitled to Green Open Access, allowing authors to post their Accepted Manuscripts to repositories, social media, personal webpages, etc. immediately upon publication.
More information on the Zero Embargo Green OA Policy can be found here.
Open access
New Review of Academic Librarianship is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
4 issues per year
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in New Review of Academic Librarianship?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in New Review of Academic Librarianship.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors, make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors