About this journal
Aims and scope
The Nonproliferation Review is a refereed journal concerned with the causes, consequences, and control of the spread of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. The Review features case studies, theoretical analyses, historical studies, reports, viewpoints, and book reviews on such issues as state-run weapons programs, treaties and export controls, safeguards, verification and compliance, disarmament, terrorism, and the economic and environmental effects of weapons proliferation.
Authors come from many countries and disciplines and include current and former government officials. For more than 20 years, the Review has been an essential resource for policy makers and scholars worldwide.
Peer Review
All manuscripts submitted through the Editorial Manager system are initially screened by the editors who will determine if the manuscript proceeds onto peer review. Research articles are reviewed by two or more anonymous referees; viewpoints are reviewed by at least one external referee. Book reviews are not subjected to peer review. Research articles and viewpoints that are solicited as part of a special section may undergo a variation of this process, as determined by the editors and the organizer of the special section. Eligible published articles are reviewed by a rotating panel of judges selected from the journal’s Editorial Board to determine the winner of the annual Doreen and Jim McElvany Nonproliferation Award.
Journal metrics
Usage
- 68K annual downloads/views
Citation metrics
- 0.7 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
- 0.000 (2023) SNIP
- 0.116 (2023) SJR
Speed/acceptance
- 82 days avg. from submission to first decision
- 35% acceptance rate
Understanding and using journal metrics
Journal metrics can be a useful tool for readers, as well as for authors who are deciding where to submit their next manuscript for publication. However, any one metric only tells a part of the story of a journal’s quality and impact. Each metric has its limitations which means that it should never be considered in isolation, and metrics should be used to support and not replace qualitative review.
We strongly recommend that you always use a number of metrics, alongside other qualitative factors such as a journal’s aims & scope, its readership, and a review of past content published in the journal. In addition, a single article should always be assessed on its own merits and never based on the metrics of the journal it was published in.
For more details, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
Journal metrics in brief
Usage and acceptance rate data above are for the last full calendar year and are updated annually in February. Speed data is updated every six months, based on the prior six months. Citation metrics are updated annually mid-year. Please note that some journals do not display all of the following metrics (find out why).
- Usage: the total number of times articles in the journal were viewed by users of Taylor & Francis Online in the previous calendar year, rounded to the nearest thousand.
Citation Metrics
- Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles published in the journal within a two-year window. Only journals in the Clarivate Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) have an Impact Factor.
- Impact Factor Best Quartile*: the journal’s highest subject category ranking in the Journal Citation Reports. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest Impact Factors.
- 5 Year Impact Factor*: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal within a five-year window.
- CiteScore (Scopus)†: the average number of citations received by articles in the journal over a four-year period.
- CiteScore Best Quartile†: the journal’s highest CiteScore ranking in a Scopus subject category. Q1 = 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores.
- SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper): the number of citations per paper in the journal, divided by citation potential in the field.
- SJR (Scimago Journal Rank): Average number of (weighted) citations in one year, divided by the number of articles published in the journal in the previous three years.
Speed/acceptance
- From submission to first decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision. Based on manuscripts receiving a first decision in the last six months.
- From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last six months.
- From acceptance to online publication: the average (median) number of days from acceptance of a manuscript to online publication of the Version of Record. Based on articles published in the last six months.
- Acceptance rate: articles accepted for publication by the journal in the previous calendar year as percentage of all papers receiving a final decision.
For more details on the data above, please read the Author Services guide to understanding journal metrics.
*Copyright: Journal Citation Reports®, Clarivate Analytics
†Copyright: CiteScore™, Scopus
Editorial board
Co-Editors
Daniel Horner
Natasha Bajema
Associate Editor
Leonard S. Spector
Anya L. Fink
Heather Williams
Editorial Board
• Ildar Akhtamzyan, PIR Center
• Avner Cohen, MIIS
• Ambassador Lewis Dunn, Charlottesville, VA
• Andrew Futter, University of Leicester
• Sumit Ganguly, Indiana University, Bloomington
• Elisa D. Harris, University of Maryland College Park
• Mark Hibbs, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
• Theresa Hitchens, University of Maryland College Park
• Jacques E.C. Hymans, University of Southern California
• R. Scott Kemp, MIT
• Jeffrey W. Knopf, MIIS
• Gregory Koblentz, George Mason University
• Li Bin, Tsinghua University
• Patrick Lynch, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
• Zia Mian, Princeton University
• James Clay Moltz (founding editor of NPR), Naval Postgraduate School
• Vipin Narang, MIT
• Robert Norris, Federation of American Scientists
• T.V. Paul, McGill University
• Benoît Pelopidas, Sciences Po
• William C. Potter, MIIS
• Maria Rost Rublee, Monash University
• Scott Sagan, Stanford University
• John Simpson, University of Southampton
• Henry Sokolski, NPEC
• Carlton Stoiber, International School of Nuclear Law
• Adam Stulberg, Georgia Tech
• Kathleen Vogel, University of Maryland College Park
• James Wirtz, Naval Postgraduate School
Open access
The Nonproliferation Review is a hybrid open access journal that is part of our Open Select publishing program, giving you the option to publish open access. Publishing open access means that your article will be free to access online immediately on publication, increasing the visibility, readership, and impact of your research.
Why choose open access?
- Increase the discoverability and readership of your article
- Make an impact and reach new readers, not just those with easy access to a research library
- Freely share your work with anyone, anywhere
- Comply with funding mandates and meet the requirements of your institution, employer or funder
- Rigorous peer review for every open access article
Article Publishing Charges (APC)
If you choose to publish open access in this journal you may be asked to pay an Article Publishing Charge (APC). You may be able to publish your article at no cost to yourself or with a reduced APC if your institution or research funder has an open access agreement or membership with Taylor & Francis.
Use our APC finder to calculate your article publishing charge
News, offers and calls for papers
News and offers
6 issues per year.
Advertising information
Would you like to advertise in The Nonproliferation Review?
Reach an engaged target audience and position your brand alongside authoritative peer-reviewed research by advertising in The Nonproliferation Review.
Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey and our publisher Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents (including the editor, any member of the editorial team or editorial board, and any guest editors), and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey and our publisher Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey and our publisher Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .
Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress
Go to submission site (link opens in a new window) Instructions for authors