Undergraduate research as a student engagement springboard: Exploring the longer-term reported benefits of participation in a research conference

References

• Altrichter, H., S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart, and O. Zuber-Skerritt. 2002. “The Concept of Action Research.” The Learning Organization 9 (3): 125–131. doi:10.1108/09696470210428840.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th ed. British Educational Research Association. Accessed August 14, 2019. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
   Google Scholar
• Caprio, M. J. 2014. “Student Publishing: Future Scholars as Change Agents.” OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives 30 (3): 144–157. doi:10.1108/OCLC-01-2014-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Cutforth, N. 2013. “The Journey of a Community-engaged Scholar: An Autoethnography.” Quest 65 (1): 14–30. doi:10.1177/1469787412441284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grez, L., M. Valcke, and I. Roozen. 2012. “How Effective are Self- and Peer Assessment of Oral Presentation Skills Compared with Teachers Assessments?” Active Learning in Higher Education 13 (2): 129–142. doi:10.1177/1469787407077984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A. 2003. The Survey Handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. J. 2002. Survey Research Methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Garde-Hansen, J., and B. Calvert. 2007. “Developing a Research Culture in the Undergraduate Curriculum.” Active Learning in Higher Education 8 (2): 105–116. doi:10.1177/1469787407077984.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 1992. Improving the Quality of Student Learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, B. 2007. Developing a Questionnaire. 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N. 2015. “Delineating the Learning Process in Generating A Research Culture among Undergraduate Social Work Students: A Case Study of Student Participation in an Academic Conference.” Social Work Education 34 (7): 829–845. doi:10.1080/02615479.2015.1072709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J., and H. Walkington. 2016. “Developing Graduate Attributes through Participation in Undergraduate Research Conferences.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 40 (2): 222–237. doi:10.1080/03098265.2016.1140128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J., V. Blackler, R. Chellew, L. Ha, and S. Lendrum. 2013. “From Researched to Researcher: Student Experiences of Becoming Co-producers and Co-disseminators of Knowledge.” Planet 27 (1): 35–41. doi:10.11120/plan.2013.27010035.
   Google Scholar
• Houlden, R. L., J. B. Raja, C. P. Collier, A. F. Clark, and J. M. Khan. 2004. “Medical Students’ Perceptions of an Undergraduate Research Elective.” Medical Teacher 26 (7): 659–661. doi:10.1080/01421590400019542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. 2014. “Learner Identities in the Context of Undergraduates: A Case Study.” Educational Research 56 (3): 343–356. doi:10.1080/00131881.2014.934557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouk, P. A. 2009. “Survey Study Investigating the Significance of Conference Participation to Undergraduate Research Students.” Journal of Chemical Education 86 (11): 1335–1340. doi:10.1021/ed086p1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuinness, M., and D. Simm. 2003. “Linking Teaching and Research through Departmental Research Conferences for Student Project Work.” Planet 11: 21–24. doi:10.11120/plan.2003.00110021.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1997. “Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 1997 (74): 5–12. doi:10.1002/ace.7401.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 2003. “Transformative Learning as Discourse.” Journal of Transformative Education 1 (1): 58–63. doi:10.1177/1541344603252172.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1996. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412984287.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L. S. 2009. Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., W. B. Dickinson, N. L. Leech, and A. G. Zoran. 2009. “A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and analyzing data in focus group research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (3): 1–21. doi: 10.1177/160940690900800301.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., and M. E. Whitecomb. 2003. “The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 579–588. doi:10.1086/378964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, S., E. Abrams, L. Townson, C. Wake, and J. E. Williams. 2010. “Intellectual Growth for Undergraduate Students: Evaluation Results from an Undergraduate Research Conference.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning 7 (2): 25–34. doi:10.19030/tlc.v7i2.86.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. A., and H. M. Single. 1996. “Focus Groups.” International Journal for Quality in Healthcare 8 (5): 499–504. doi:10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronnlund, M., K. Ledman, M. Nylund, and P.-A. Rosvall. 2019. “Life Skills for ‘Real Life’: How Critical Thinking Is Contextualised across Vocational Programmes.” Educational Research. doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1633942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A., and D. Tilbury. 2013. Flexible Pedagogies: New Pedagogical Ideas. London: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., and E. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. 2005. Action Research: A Methodology for Change and Development: A Methodology for Change and Development. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., J. Brodeur, T. Kajaks, M. Luck, P. Myatt, A. Verburgh, H. Walkington, and B. Wuetherick. 2013. “Completing the Research Cycle: A Framework for Promoting Dissemination of Undergraduate Research and Inquiry.” Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal 1 (2): 105–118. doi:10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.2.105.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M., C. Lido, J. Morgan, and L. S. Solomon. 2011. “The Impact of Engagement with Extracurricular Activities on the Student Experience and Graduate Outcomes for Widening Participation Populations.” Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (3): 203–215. doi:10.1177/1469787411415081.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. J., G. Clark, M. Walker, and J. D. Whyatt. 2013. “‘It’s Just like an Extra String to Your Bow’: Exploring Higher Education Students’ Perceptions and Experiences of Extracurricular Activity and Employability.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1177/1469787413481129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkington, H. 2014. “Quality Enhancement of Undergraduate Research - Further Strategies to Increase Student Engagement in Research Dissemination.” Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 6 (1): Retrieved from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, H., and A. Jenkins. 2008. “Embedding Undergraduate Research Publication in the Student Learning Experience.” Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 2 (3): Retrieved from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Walkington, H., J. Hill, and P. E. Kneale. 2017. “Reciprocal Elucidation: A Student-led Pedagogy in Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Research Conferences.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1208155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walliman, N. 2011. Research Methods: The Basics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willison, J., and K. O’Regan. 2007. “Commonly Known, Commonly Not Known, Totally Unknown: A Framework for Students Becoming Researchers.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (4): 393–409. doi:10.1080/07294360701658609.
   Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., and L. Leach. 2010. “Improving Student Engagement: Ten Proposals for Action.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11 (3): 167–177. doi:10.1080/07294360701658609.
   Google Scholar