References
- Andridge RR, Little RJ. 2010. A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response. Int Stat Rev. 78:40–64.
- Beckman TJ, Lee MC, Rohren CH, Pankratz VS. 2003. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Med Teach. 25:131–135.
- Bock RD, Gibbons R, Muraki E. 1988. Full-information item factor analysis. Appl Psychol Meas. 12:261–280.
- Boyle P, Grimm M, Scicluna H, McNeil HP. 2009. The UNSW Medicine Student Experience Questionnaire (MedSEQ): a synopsis of its development, features and utility. Available from: http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/41547.
- Bühner M. 2006. Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson: Munich.
- Centra JA, Gaubatz NB. 2005. Student perceptions of learning and instructional effectiveness in college courses. A Validity Study of SIR II. Educational Testing Service [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 15]. Available from: https://www.ets.org/Media/Products/perceptions.pdf
- Cook SS. 1989. Improving the quality of student ratings of instruction: A look at two strategies. Res High Educ. 30:31–45.
- Copeland HL, Hewson MG. 2000. Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical center. Acad Med. 75:161–166.
- Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. 2010. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 25:1337–1345.
- Gollwitzer M, Schlotz W. 2003. Das “Trierer Inventar zur Lehrveranstaltungsevaluation” (TRIL): Entwicklung und erste testtheoretische Erprobungen. Deutscher Psychologen Verlag: Bonn. pp. 114–128. (Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation IV).
- Guadagnoli E, Velicer WF. 1988. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 103:265–275.
- Hu L, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 6:1–55.
- Iblher P, Zupanic M, Hartel C, Heinze H, Schmucker P. Fischer. 2011. The questionnaire “SFDP26-German”: a reliable tool for evaluation of clinical teaching?. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 28:Doc30
- Ivancevich JM. 1979. Longitudinal study of the effects of rater training on psychometric error in ratings. J App Psychol. 64:502–508.
- Janicik RW, Fletcher KE. 2003. Teaching at the bedside: a new model. Med Teach. 25:127–130.
- Young ME, Cruess SW, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. 2013. The professional assessment of clinical teachers (PACT): the reliability and validity of a novel tool to evaluate professional and clinical behaviors. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 19:99–113.
- Keeley JW, English T, Irons J, Henslee AM. 2013. Investigating halo and ceiling effects in student evaluations of instruction. Educ Psychol Meas. 73:440–457.
- Litzelman DK, Stratos GA, Marriott DJ, Skeff KM. 1998. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med. 73:688–695.
- Marsh HW. 1982. SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. Br J Psychol. 52:77–95.
- McKeachie WJ. 1979. Student ratings of faculty: a reprise. Academe. 65:384–397.
- Meredith W. 1993. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 58:525–543.
- Miller RI. 1987. Evaluating faculty for tenure and promotion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Morrison EH, Boker JR, Hollingshead J, Prislin MD, Hitchcook MA, Litzelman DK. 2002. Reliability and validity of an objective structured teaching examination for generalist resident teachers. Acad Med. 77:S29–S32.
- Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ. 1998. Impediments to bed-side teaching. Med Educ. 32:159–162.
- Ramani S, Orlander JD, Strunin L, Barber TW. 2003. Whither bedside teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 78:384–390.
- Ramani S, Leinster S. 2008. AMEE Guide no. 34: teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 30:347–364.
- Ramani S, Orlander JD. 2013. Human dimensions in bedside teaching: focus group discussions of teachers and learners. Teach Learn Med. 25:312–318.
- Raupach T, Muenscher C, Anders S. 2009. Web-based collaborative training of clinical reasoning: a randomized trial. Med Teach. 31:e431–e437.
- Schmitt N, Kuljanin G. 1988. Measurement invariance: review of practice and implications. Res Met Hum Resour Manage. 3:29–33.
- Skeff KM. 1988. Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 3:S26–S33.
- Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, Rothman A, Rowe R. 2000. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges. Med Educ. 34:862–870.
- Spencer J. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: learning and teaching in the clinical environment. BMJ. 326:591–594.
- Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens A, Scherpbier AJ. 2010. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 85:1732–1738.
- Staufenbiel T. 2000. Fragebogen zur evaluation von universitären lehrveranstaltungen durch studierende und lehrende. Diagnostica. 4:169–181.
- Strand P, Sjöborg K, Stalmeijer R, Wichmann-Hansen G, Jakobsson U, Edgren G. 2013. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM). Med Teach. 35:1014–1026.
- Vandenberg RJ. 2002. Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Org Res Met. 5:139–158.
- Williams KN, Ramani S, Fraser B, Orlander JD. 2008. Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners. Acad Med. 83:257–264.
- Weissmann PF, Branch WT, Gracey CF, Haidet P, Frankel RM. 2006. Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts. Acad Med. 81:661–667.
- Wojtczak A. 2002. Glossary of medical education terms: part 1. Med Teach. 24:216–219.
- Zuberi RW, Bordage G, Norman GR. 2007. Validation of the SETOC instrument – student evaluation of teaching in outpatient clinics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 12:55–69.