Uncovering the unknown: A grounded theory study exploring the impact of self-awareness on the culture of feedback in residency education

References

• Bernabeo EC, Holtman MC, Ginsburg S, Rosenbaum JR, Holmboe ES. 2011. Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Acad Med. 86:591–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JP, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma DA, van der Vleuten CP. 2013. Clarifying students’ feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ. 47:282–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D. 1995. Enhancing learning through self assessment. London; New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Boud D. 2015. Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clin Teach. 12:3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D. 1985. Reflection, turning experience into learning. London; New York: Kogan Page; Nichols Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon P, Sargeant J. 2008. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 337:a1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffey LJ, de Leeuw EJ, Finnigan GA. 2012. Facilitating students’ reflective practice in a medical course: literature review. Educ Health. 25:198–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London; Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2012. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Creswell JW. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crommelinck M, Anseel F. 2013. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: a literature review. Med Educ. 47:232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. 2006. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 296:1094–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delva D, Sargeant J, MacLeod T. 2011. Feedback: a perennial problem. Med Teach. 33:861–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Dojeiji S, Day K, Varpio L. 2016. Feedback to supervisors: is anonymity really so important? Acad Med. 91:1305–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning D, Heath C, Suls JM. 2004. Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 5:69–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D, Kruger J. 2008. Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 105:98–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Hundert EM. 2002. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 287:226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Regehr G. 2005. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 80:S46–S54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Regehr G. 2007. Knowing when to look it up: a new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med. 82:S81–S84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Regehr G. 2008. “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 28:14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. 2012. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 17:15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton A, Kang I, Wong R, Loo LK. 2015. Teaching medical students to reflect more deeply. Teach Learn Med. 27:410–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe E, Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E. 2011. The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions? Med Educ. 45:69–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES, Ross K. 2012. Commentary: realizing the formative potential of multisource feedback in regulatory-based assessment programs. Acad Med. 87:1657–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. 2006. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 40:101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 77:1121–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft J. 1969. Of human interaction. Palo Alto (CA): National Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. 2011. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 86:1120–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon J. 2004. A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Numerof RE. 1979. How assertive are you? A look through the Johari Window. Health Serv Manager. 12:7–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patton MQ. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani S. 2016. Reflections on feedback: closing the loop. Med Teach. 38:206–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Mann K. 2016. Introducing medical educators to qualitative study design: twelve tips from inception to completion. Med Teach. 38:456–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Post SE, Konings K, Mann K, Katz JT, van der Vleuten C. 2017. “It's just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teach Learn Med. 29:153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J. 2008. ‘To call or not to call’: making informed self-assessment. Med Educ. 42:854–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J. 2012. How external performance standards inform self-assessment. Med Teach. 34:267–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J. 2015. Reflecting upon multisource feedback as ‘assessment for learning’. Perspect Med Educ. 4:55–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, Driessen E, MacLeod T, Yen W, Ross K, et al. 2015. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med. 90:1698–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. 2005. Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ. 39:497–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2007. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ. 41:583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2008a. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 13:275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2008b. “Directed” self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 28:47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. 2009. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14:399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, McNaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. 2011. Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Med Teach. 33:744–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scho¨n DA. 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher DJ, Englander R, Carraccio C. 2013. Developing the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environment. Acad Med. 88:1635–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute V. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 78:153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland JA. 1995. The Johari Window: a strategy for teaching therapeutic confrontation. Nurse Educ. 20:22–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. 2015. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 90:609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. 2016. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 50:933–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate OT. 2013. Why receiving feedback collides with self determination. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 18:845–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate OT, Sargeant J. 2011. Multisource feedback for residents: how high must the stakes be? J Grad Med Educ. 3:453–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Bok HG. 2013. Believing is seeing: how people’s beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour. Med Educ. 47:1064–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F. 2009. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 84:910–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ridder JM, Berk FC, Stokking KM, Ten Cate OT. 2014. Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance. Med Teach. 13:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meulen MW, Boerebach BC, Smirnova A, Heeneman S, Oude Egbrink MG, van der Vleuten CP, Arah OA, Lombarts KM. 2017. Validation of the INCEPT: a multisource feedback tool for capturing different perspectives on physicians’ professional performance. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 37:9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW Jr. 2001. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. J Appl Psychol. 86:629–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D, Ganesan S, Challagalla GN, Brown SP. 2000. An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: disposition, context, and cognition. J Appl Psychol. 85:996–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verklan MT. 2007. Johari window: a model for communicating to each other. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 21:173–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ. 2014a. Cognition, culture, and credibility: deconstructing feedback in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 3:124–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watling CJ. 2014b. Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: feedback at the crossroads. Med Teach. 36:692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Lingard L. 2012. Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Med Teach. 34:850–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. 2013. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 47:585–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt D. 2007. On becoming a qualitative researcher: the value of reflexivity. TQR. 12:82–101.
   Google Scholar