Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: Swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships

References

• Anderson PA. 2012. Giving feedback on clinical skills: are we starving our young? J Grad Med Educ. 4:154–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bing-You R, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, Mckelvy D. 2017a. Feedback for learners in medical education: what is known? A scoping review. Acad Med. 92:1346–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You R, Varaklis K, Hayes V, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, Mckelvy D. 2017b. The feedback tango: an integrative review and analysis of the content of the teacher–learner feedback exchange. Acad Med. [accessed 2017 Oct 3]. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. 2009. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA. 302:1330–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D. 2015. Feedback: ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clin Teach. 12:3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crommelinck M, Anseel F. 2013. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: a literature review. Med Educ. 47:232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delva D, Sargeant J, Macleod T. 2011. Feedback: a perennial problem. Med Teach. 33:861–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. 1990. Self-theories and goals: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Nebr Symp Motiv. 38:199–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck CS. 2006. Mindset: the new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. 2012. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 17:15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Regehr G. 2008. “I'll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 28:14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunt A, Patel A, Rusius V, Royle TJ, Markham DH, Pawlikowska T. 2017. ‘Playing the game’: How do surgical trainees seek feedback using workplace-based assessment? Med Educ. 51:953–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L, Eva KW. 2015. Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments. Med Educ. 49:296–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten C, Eva KW, Lingard L. 2016. Hedging to save face: a linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 21:175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. 2012. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ. 46:201–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan JR, Hatala R, Hauer KE, Holmboe E. 2017. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 6:286–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Brand-Gruwel S, van Merriënboer JJG. 2005. Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. Br J Educ Psychol. 75:645–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Seidel T, van Merriënboer JJG. 2014. Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instr Sci. 42:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft J. 1969. Of human interaction. Palo Alto (CA): National Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. 2011. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 86:1120–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy E, Boud D. 2013. Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Med Educ. 47:227–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Post SE, Konings K, Mann K, Katz JT, van der Vleuten C. 2017a. “It’s just not the culture”: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teach Learn Med. 29:153–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Könings KD, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CPM. 2017b. About politeness, face and feedback: exploring perceptions of residents and faculty regarding institutional cultural factors that influence feedback. Acad Med.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Konings K, Mann KV, van der Vleuten C. 2017c. Uncovering the unknown: a grounded theory study exploring the impact of self-awareness on the culture of feedback in residency education. Med Teach. 39:1065–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich JV. 2017. Proposing a model of co-regulated learning for graduate medical education. Acad Med. 92:1100–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, van der Vleuten C. 2010. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med. 85:1212–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer JM, Loney E, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP. 2011a. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Med Educ. 45:636–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Armson H, Warren A, Zetkulic M, Sokladaris S, Konings K, Ross K, Silver I, et al. 2017a. The R2C2 model in residency education: How does it improve feedback use? Acad Med. [accessed 2018 Jan 16]. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, Driessen E, Macleod T, Yen W, Ross K, et al. 2015a. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med. 90:1698–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, Driessen E, Macleod T, Yen W, Ross K, et al. 2015b. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med. 90:1698–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Manos S, Epstein I, Warren A, Shearer C, Boudreau M. 2017b. R2C2 in action: testing an evidence-based model to facilitate feedback and coaching in residency. J Grad Med Educ. 9:165–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2007. Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes. Med Educ. 41:583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 2008. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 13:275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mcnaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. 2011b. Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Med Teach. 33:744–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. 2009. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 14:399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein EH. 2017. Organizational culture and leadership. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Skeff KM, Mutha S. 1998. Role models–guiding the future of medicine. N Engl J Med. 339:2015–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan M, Li ST, Meyers FJ, Pratt DD, Collins JB, Braddock C, Skeff KM, West DC, Henderson M, Hales RE, Hilty DM. 2011. “Teaching as a competency”: competencies for medical educators. Acad Med. 86:1211–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. 2015. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 90:609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. 2016. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 50:933–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate O, Snell L, Mann K, Vermunt J. 2004. Orienting teaching toward the learning process. Acad Med. 79:219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Bok HG. 2013. Believing is seeing: how people’s beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour. Med Educ. 47:1064–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F. 2009. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 84:910–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ridder JM, Berk FC, Stokking KM, Ten Cate OT. 2015. Feedback providers’ credibility impacts students’ satisfaction with feedback and delayed performance. Med Teach. 37:767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de ridder JM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, Ten Cate OT. 2008. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 42:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Eertwegh V, van der Vleuten C, Stalmeijer R, van Dalen J, Scherpbier A, van Dulmen S. 2015. Exploring residents’ communication learning process in the workplace: a five-phase model. PLoS One. 10:e0125958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewalle D, Cron WL, Slocum JW. Jr. 2001. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. J Appl Psychol. 86:629–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewalle D, Cummings LL. 1997. A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. J Appl Psychol. 82:390–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B, Wallace D, Mangera Z, Gill D. 2017. Becoming ‘ward smart’ medical students. Clin Teach. 14:336–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C. 2014a. Cognition, culture, and credibility: deconstructing feedback in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 3:124–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watling CJ. 2014b. Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: feedback at the crossroads. Med Teach. 36:692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C. 2015. When I say … learning culture. Med Educ. 49:556–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. 2014. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians. Med Educ. 48:713–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. 2013a. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 47:585–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. 2013b. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Med Educ. 47:842–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar