1,296
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Assessing medical student performance of Entrustable Professional Activities: A mixed methods comparison of Co-Activity and Supervisory Scales

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • American Educational Research Association. 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association.
  • Angus SV, Vu TR, Willett LL, Call S, Halvorsen AJ, Chaudhry S. 2017. Internal medicine residency program directors’ views of the core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: an opportunity to enhance communication of competency along the continuum. Acad Med. 92(6):785–791.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 2014. Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: curriculum developers' guide. AAMC iCollaborative, Washington, DC. [accessed 2 Nov 2019]. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/63/%20
  • Boursicot K, Etheridge L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, Sambandam E. 2011. Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Med Teach. 33(5):370–383.
  • Brown DGM, Lupi C, Obeso V, Hyderi A, Cutrer B, Warren J, Carney P, Phillipi C. 2017a. Supervisory language task force executive summary.
  • Brown DR, Warren JB, Hyderi A, Drusin RE, Moeller J, Rosenfeld M, Orlander PR, Yingling S, Call S, Terhune K, et al. 2017b. Finding a path to entrustment in undergraduate medical education: a progress report from the AAMC core entrustable professional activities for entering residency entrustment concept group. Acad Med. 92(6):774–779.
  • Carraccio CL, Englander R. 2013. From flexner to competencies: reflections on a decade and the journey ahead. Acad Med. 88(8):1067–1073.
  • Chen HC, van den Broek WE, ten Cate O. 2015. The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 90(4):431–436.
  • Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, Wade W. 2011. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Med Educ. 45(6):560–569.
  • Crossley J, Jolly B. 2012. Making sense of work-based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people. Med Educ. 46(1):28–37.
  • Cutrer WB, Miller B, Pusic MV, Mejicano G, Mangrulkar RS, Gruppen LD, Hawkins RE, Skochelak SE, Moore DE. Jr. 2017. Fostering the development of master adaptive learners: a conceptual model to guide skill acquisition in medical education. Acad Med. 92(1):70–75.
  • Dolan BM, O’Brien CL, Green MM. 2017. Including entrustment language in an assessment form may improve constructive feedback for student clinical skills. Med Sci Educ. 27(3):461–464.
  • Eliasz KL, Ark TK, Nick MW, Ng GM, Zabar S, Kalet AL. 2018. Capturing entrustment: using an end-of-training simulated workplace to assess the entrustment of near-graduating medical students from multiple perspectives. Med Sci Educ. 28(4):739.
  • Englander R, Flynn T, Call S, Carraccio C, Cleary L, Fulton TB, Garrity MJ, Lieberman SA, Lindeman B, Lypson ML, et al. 2016. Toward defining the foundation of the MD degree: core entrustable professional activities for entering residency. Acad Med. 91(10):1352–1358.
  • Englander R, Frank JR, Carraccio C, Sherbino J, Ross S, Snell L, Collaborators I. 2017. Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 39(6):582–587.
  • Favreau MA, Tewksbury L, Lupi C, Cutrer WB, Jokela JA, Yarris LM, 2017. Constructing a shared mental model for faculty development for the core entrustable professional activities for entering residency. Acad Med. 92(6):759–764.
  • Gofton WT, Dudek NL, Wood TJ, Balaa F, Hamstra SJ. 2012. The Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE): a tool to assess surgical competence. Acad Med. 87(10):1401–1407.
  • Halman S, Rekman J, Wood T, Baird A, Gofton W, Dudek N. 2018. Avoid reinventing the wheel: implementation of the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool (OCAT) in internal medicine. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):218.
  • Hoang NS, Lau JN. 2018. A call for mixed methods in competency-based medical education: how we can prevent the overfitting of curriculum and assessment. Acad Med. 93(7):996–1001.
  • Hodges B. 2013. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach. 35(7):564–568.
  • Kane MT. 2013. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. J Educ Measure. 50(1):1–73.
  • Khan K, Ramachandran S. 2012. Conceptual framework for performance assessment: competency, competence and performance in the context of assessments in healthcare–deciphering the terminology. Med Teach. 34(11):920–928.
  • Kreiter C. 2015. When I say… response process validity. Med Educ. 49(3):247–248.
  • Linn R, Baker E, Dunbar S. 1991. Complex, performance-based assessment: expectations and validation criteria. Educ Res. 20(8):15–21.
  • Lomis KD, Russell RG, Davidson MA, Fleming AE, Pettepher CC, Cutrer WB, Fleming GM, Miller BM. 2017. Competency milestones for medical students: design, implementation, and analysis at one medical school. Med Teach. 39(5):494–504.
  • Lomis K, Amiel JM, Ryan MS, Esposito K, Green M, Stagnaro-Green A, Bull J, Mejicano GC. 2017. Implementing an entrustable professional activities framework in undergraduate medical education: early lessons from the AAMC core entrustable professional activities for entering residency pilot. Acad Med. 92(6):765–770.
  • Lucey CR, Thibault GE, ten Cate O. 2018. Competency-based, time-variable education in the health professions: crossroads. Acad Med. 93:S1–S5.
  • Messick S. 1989. Validity. In Linn R, editor. Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York (NY): Macmillian Publishing Company.
  • Messick S. 1994. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educ Res. 23(2):13–23.
  • Natesan P, Batley NJ, Bakhti R, El-Doueihi PZ. 2018. Challenges in measuring ACGME competencies: considerations for milestones. Int J Emerg Med. 11(1):1–6.
  • Padilla JL, Benitez I. 2014. Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema. 26(1):136–144.
  • Rekman J, Gofton W, Dudek N, Gofton T, Hamstra SJ. 2016. Entrustability scales: outlining their usefulness for competency-based clinical assessment. Acad Med. 91(2):186–190.
  • Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. 2004. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Sagasser MH, Fluit C, van Weel C, van der Vleuten CPM, Kramer AWM. 2017. How entrustment is informed by holistic judgments across time in a family medicine residency program: an ethnographic nonparticipant observational study. Acad Med. 92(6):792–799.
  • Saldana J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Swing SR. 2007. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 29(7):648–654.
  • ten Cate O, Regehr G. 2018. The power of subjectivity in the assessment of medical trainees. Acad Med. 94(3):1.
  • ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. 2015. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE guide no. 99. Med Teach. 37(11):983–1002.
  • van der Vleuten CP. 2014. When I say … context specificity. Med Educ. 48(3):234–235.
  • van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. 2005. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 39(3):309–317.
  • Warm EJ, Kinnear B, Kelleher M, Sall D, Holmboe E. 2018. Transforming resident assessment: an analysis using Deming’s system of profound knowledge. Acad Med. 94(2):195–201.
  • Whitehead CR, Kuper A, Hodges B, Ellaway R. 2015. Conceptual and practical challenges in the assessment of physician competencies. Med Teach. 37(3):245–251.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.