409
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Difference in demographics and motivation to study medicine with respect to medical students’ channel of admission: A national study

, , &

References

  • Bardes CL, Best PC, Kremer SJ, Dienstag JL. 2009. Perspective: medical school admissions and noncognitive testing: some open questions. Acad Med. 84(10):1360–1363.
  • Breil SM, Forthmann B, Hertel-Waszak A, Ahrens H, Brouwer B, Schonefeld E, Marschall B, Back MD. 2020. Construct validity of multiple mini interviews - investigating the role of stations, skills, and raters using Bayesian G-theory. Med Teach. 42(2):164–171.
  • Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg C. 2006. Swiss residents' speciality choices-impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals. BMC Health Serv Res. 6:137.
  • Cleland J. 2018. The medical school admissions process and meeting the public's health care needs: never the twain shall meet? Acad Med. 93(7):972–974.
  • Conrad SS, Addams AN, Young GH. 2016. Holistic review in medical school admissions and selection: a strategic, mission-driven response to shifting societal needs. Acad Med. 91(11):1472–1474.
  • Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Ministry of Interior Affairs, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan) [DGOB]. 2018. Statistical tables of population in education level. Taipei (TWN): Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Ministry of Interior Affairs, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan); [accessed 2020 Jul 13]. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=43913&ctNode=3102.
  • Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior Affairs, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan) [DOHR]. 2018. Statistical tables of population. Taipei (TWN): Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior Affairs, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan); [accessed 2020 Jul 13]. https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346.
  • Dunleavy D, Sondheimer H, Castillo-Page L, Bletzinger RB. 2011. Medical school admissions: more than grades and test scores. Analysis in Brief, Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/analysis-brief/report/medical-school-admissions-more-grades-and-test-scores.
  • Dunleavy DM, Whittaker KM. 2011. The evolving medical school admission interview. Analysis in Brief, Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/analysis-brief/report/evolving-medical-school-admissions-interview.
  • Eva KW, Macala C, Fleming B. 2019. Twelve tips for constructing a multiple mini-interview. Med Teach. 41(5):510–516.
  • Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Wood TJ, Norman GR. 2012. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA. 308(21):2233–2240.
  • Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. 2004. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ. 38(3):314–326.
  • Fang JT, Ko YS, Chien CC, Yu KH. 2013. Assessing medical students' performance in core competencies using multiple admission programs for colleges and universities: from the perspective of multi-source feedback. Biomed J. 36(4):188–197.
  • Gąsiorowski J, Rudowicz E, Safranow K. 2015. Motivation towards medical career choice and future career plans of Polish medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 20(3):709–725.
  • Jerant A, Fancher T, Fenton JJ, Fiscella K, Sousa F, Franks P, Henderson M. 2015. How medical school applicant race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status relate to multiple mini-interview-based admissions outcomes: findings from one medical school. Acad Med. 90(12):1667–1674.
  • Jerant A, Henderson MC, Griffin E, Hall TR, Kelly CJ, Peterson EM, Wofsy D, Franks P. 2018. Do multiple mini-interview and traditional interview scores differ in their associations with acceptance offers within and across five California medical schools? Acad Med. 93(8):1227–1233.
  • Jerant A, Henderson MC, Griffin E, Hall TR, Kelly CJ, Peterson EM, Wofsy D, Tancredi DJ, Sousa FJ, Franks P. 2019. Do admissions multiple mini-interview and traditional interview scores predict subsequent academic performance? a study of five California medical schools. Acad Med. 94(3):388–395.
  • Jolly P. 2008. Diversity of US medical student by parental income. Analysis in Brief, Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/analysis-brief/report/diversity-us-medical-students-parental-income.
  • Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Galindo-Garré F, Ten Cate O. 2013. Motivational profiles of medical students: association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion. BMC Med Educ. 13(1):87.
  • Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, van Asperen M, Croiset G. 2011. Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: A review of the literature. Med Teach. 33(5):e242–e262.
  • Lambe P, Waters C, Bristow D. 2013. Do differentials in the support and advice available at UK schools and colleges influence candidate performance in the medical school admissions interview? A survey of direct school leaver applicants to a UK medical school. Med Teach. 35(9):731–739.
  • Laven G, Wilkinson D. 2003. Rural doctors and rural backgrounds: How strong is the evidence? A systematic review. Aust J Rural Health. 11(6):277–284.
  • Leduc J, Rioux R, Gagnon R, Bourdy C, Dennis A. 2017. Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews. Med Teach. 39(3):285–294.
  • Lee HJ, Park SB, Park SC, Park WS, Ryu S, Yang JH, Na S, Won JY, Chae GB. 2016. Multiple mini-interviews as a predictor of academic achievements during the first 2 years of medical school. BMC Res Notes. 9:93.
  • Lin SC. 2005. Sociology of education: assessment of social economic status. 4th ed. Taipei (TWN): Chuliu Publishing; p. 48–50.
  • Ma C, Harris P, Cole A, Jones P, Shulruf B. 2016. Selection into medicine using interviews and other measures: much remains to be learned. Issues Educ Res. 26(4):623–634.
  • Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Cousans F, Cleland J. 2016. How effective are selection methods in medical education? a systematic review. Med Educ. 50(1):36–60.
  • Pau A, Jeevaratnam K, Chen YS, Fall AA, Khoo C, Nadarajah VD. 2013. The multiple mini-interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review. Med Teach. 35(12):1027–1041.
  • Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, Centeno A, Mccrorie P, Mcmanus C, Patterson F, Powis D, Tekian A, Wilkinson D. 2011. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach. 33(3):215–223.
  • Puddey IB, Mercer A, Playford DE, Riley GJ. 2015. Medical student selection criteria and socio-demographic factors as a predictor of ultimately working rurally after graduation. BMC Med Educ. 15(1):74. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-015-0359-5.
  • Puddey IB, Playford DE, Mercer A. 2017. Impact of medical student origins on the likelihood of ultimately practicing in areas of low vs high socio-economic status. BMC Med Educ. 17(1):1.
  • Razack S, Hodges B, Steinert Y, Maguire M. 2015. Seeking inclusion in an exclusive process: discourses of medical school student selection. Med Educ. 49(1):36–47.
  • Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. 2007. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ. 41(4):378–384.
  • Ross M, Walker L, Cooke L, Raman M, Ravani P, Coderre S, McLaughlin K. 2017. Are female applicants rated higher than males on the multiple mini-Interview? Findings from the University of Calgary. Acad Med. 92(6):841–846.
  • Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. 2002. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 288(6):756–764.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 25(1):54–67.
  • Sobral DT. 2004. What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests? Med Educ. 38(9):950–957.
  • Soemantri D, Karunathilake I, Yang JH, Chang SC, Lin CH, Nadarajah VD, Nishigori H, Samarasekera DD, Lee SS, Tanchoco LR, et al. 2020. Admission policies and methods at crossroads: a review of medical school admission policies and methods in seven Asian countries. Korean J Med Educ. 32(3):243–256.
  • Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan). 2019. Physician workforce in Taiwan. Taipei (TWN): Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan); [accessed 2021 Feb 22]. https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-57563-b89d0471-e3f3-403d-9fd8-54e0554215c8.html.
  • Taylor CA, Green KE, Spruce A. 2015. Evaluation of the effect of socio-economic status on performance in a multiple Mini Interview for admission to medical school. Med Teach. 37(1):59–63.
  • Vaglum P, Wiers-Jenssen J, Ekeberg O. 1999. Motivation for medical school: the relationship to gender and specialty preferences in a nationwide sample. Med Educ. 33(4):236–242.
  • Wouters A, Croiset G, Galindo-Garre F, Kusurkar RA. 2016. Motivation of medical students: selection by motivation or motivation by selection. BMC Med Educ. 16(1):37.
  • Wouters A, Croiset G, Schripsema NR, Cohen-Schotanus J, Spaai GWG, Hulsman RL, Kusurkar RA. 2017. A multi-site study on medical school selection, performance, motivation and engagement. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 22(2):447–462.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.