Ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education: AMEE Guide No. 158

References

• Anderson C. 2008. The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
   Google Scholar
• Arizmendi CJ, Bernacki ML, Raković M, Plumley RD, Urban CJ, Panter AT, Greene JA, Gates KM. 2022. Predicting student outcomes using digital logs of learning behaviors: review, current standards, and suggestions for future work. Behav Res. DOI:10.3758/s13428-022-01939-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay S, Boylan CT, Baho YG, Casey A, Asif A, Khalil H, Badwi N, Patel R. 2022. Ethnicity-related stereotypes and their impacts on medical students: a critical narrative review of health professions education literature. Med Teach. 44(9):986–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S. 2021. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big?. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM, Virtual Event Canada. p. 610–623.
   Google Scholar
• Benninger B. 2013. Formally acknowledging donor-cadaver-patients in the basic and clinical science research arena: acknowledging donor-cadaver-patients. Clin Anat. 26(7):810–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boninger F, Molnar A. 2022. Don’t go ‘Along’ with corporate schemes to gather up student data. Phi Delta Kappan. 103(7):33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornet P. 2021. Tweet. https://twitter.com/pascal_bornet/status/1457951888272343049
   Google Scholar
• Boughman E, Kohut SBAR, Sella-Villa D, Silvestro MV. 2017. “Alexa, do you have rights?”: legal issues posed by voice-controlled devices and the data they create. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/publications/blt/2017/07/05_boughman/
   Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Crawford K. 2011. Six provocations for big data. SSRN J. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1926431.
   Google Scholar
• Brown M, Klein C. 2020. Whose data? Which rights? Whose power? A policy discourse analysis of student privacy policy documents. J High Educ. 91(7):1149–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byram M. 2022. Languages and identities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan SA, Demir K, Karaca O. 2022. Artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum: an e-Delphi study for competencies. PLoS One. 17(7):e0271872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O. 2009. Why the ethics of medical education research differs from that of medical research. Med Educ. 43(7):608–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Cate O, Dahdal S, Lambert T, Neubauer F, Pless A, Pohlmann PF, van Rijen H, Gurtner C. 2020. Ten caveats of learning analytics in health professions education: a consumer’s perspective. Med Teach. 42(6):673–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik I. 2023. Towards Intelligent-TPACK: an empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Comput Hum Behav. 138:107468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KS, Zary N. 2019. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 5(1):e13930.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cobianchi L, Verde JM, Loftus TJ, Piccolo D, Dal Mas F, Mascagni P, Garcia Vazquez A, Ansaloni L, Marseglia GR, Massaro M, et al. 2022. Artificial intelligence and surgery: ethical dilemmas and open issues. J Am Coll Surg [Internet]. 235(2):268–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoE Commissioner for Human Rights 2019. Unboxing artificial intelligence: 10 steps to protect human rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Cook S. 2021. US schools leaked 28.6 million records in 1,851 data breaches since 2005. Comparitech. https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/us-schools-data-breaches/
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Brown S. 2020. The ethics of medical AI and the physician-patient relationship. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 29(1):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damrosch SP. 1986. Ensuring anonymity by use of subject-generated identification codes. Res Nurs Health. 9(1):61–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descartes 1637. Discourse on the method and the meditations. 1968 edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ellaway RH, Pusic MV, Galbraith RM, Cameron T. 2014. Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education. Med Teach. 36(3):216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament 2016. EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdprinfo.eu/
   Google Scholar
• FNB 2019. The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. 2nd ed. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller 2022. Google engineer claims AI technology LaMDA is sentient. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-13/google-ai-lamda-sentient-engineer-blake-lemoine-says/101147222
   Google Scholar
• Gabelica M, Bojčić R, Puljak L. 2022. Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: mixed-methods study. J Clin Epidemiol. 150:33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebru T, Mitchell M. 2022. We warned Google that people might believe AI was sentient. Now it’s happening. Wash Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/17/google-ai-ethics-sentient-lemoine-warning/
   Google Scholar
• Gichoya JW, Banerjee I, Bhimireddy AR, Burns JL, Celi LA, Chen L-C, Correa R, Dullerud N, Ghassemi M, Huang S-C, et al. 2022. AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study. Lancet Digit Health. 4(6):e406–e414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gijsberts CM, Groenewegen KA, Hoefer IE, Eijkemans MJC, Asselbergs FW, Anderson TJ, Britton AR, Dekker JM, Engström G, Evans GW, et al. 2015. Race/Ethnic differences in the associations of the framingham risk factors with carotid IMT and cardiovascular events. PLoS One. 10(7):e0132321–e0132321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gin BC, Ten Cate O, O'Sullivan PS, Hauer KE, Boscardin C. 2022. Exploring how feedback reflects entrustment decisions using artificial intelligence. Med Educ. 56(3):303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason N. 2022. ChatGPT and the rise of AI writers: how should higher education respond? Campus Learn Share Connect. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/chatgpt-and-rise-ai-writers-how-should-higher-education-respond
   Google Scholar
• Goh PS, Sandars J. 2019. Increasing tensions in the ubiquitous use of technology for medical education. Med Teach. 41(6):716–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieves MW. 2019. Virtually intelligent product systems: digital and physical twins. In: Flumerfelt S, Schwartz KG, Mavris D, Briceno S, editors. Complex systems engineering: theory and practice. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. p. 175–200.
   Google Scholar
• Grunhut J, Marques O, Wyatt ATM. 2022. Needs, challenges, and applications of artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum. JMIR Med Educ. 8(2):e35587.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han HJ. 2022. How dare they peep into my private life? Human rights Watch Report. USA. https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/05/25/how-dare-they-peep-my-private-life/childrens-rights-violations-governments
   Google Scholar
• Hays R, Masters K. 2020. Publishing ethics in medical education: guidance for authors and reviewers in a changing world. MedEdPublish. 9:10–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HHS 2021. Exemptions (2018 Requirements). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/common-rule-subpart-a-46104/index.html
   Google Scholar
• High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (HLEG AI). 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission
   Google Scholar
• Jones K, Thomson J, Arnold K. 2014. Questions of data ownership on campus. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/8/questions-of-data-ownership-on-campus
   Google Scholar
• Klinger. 2021. What is an AI Model? Here’s what you need to know. https://viso.ai/deep-learning/ml-ai-models/
   Google Scholar
• Kononowicz AA, Zary N, Edelbring S, Corral J, Hege I. 2015. Virtual patients - what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education. BMC Med Educ. 15(1):11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattouf OM. 2022. Impact of digital transformation on the future of medical education and practice. J Card Surg.:Jocs.16642. 37(9):2799–2808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus MD, Truong M, Douglas P, Selwyn N. 2022. Artificial intelligence and clinical anatomical education: promises and perils. Anat Sci Educ. DOI:10.1002/ase.2221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi A-L, Brewer D, Christakis N, Contractor N, Fowler J, Gutmann M, et al. 2009. Computational social. Science. 323(5915):721–723.,.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Wu AS, Li D, Kulasegaram, KM, (2021). Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Acad Med. 96(11S):S62–S70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine B. 2022. Is LaMDA Sentient? — an Interview. Medium. https://cajundiscordian.medium.com/is-lamda-sentient-an-interview-ea64d916d917
   Google Scholar
• Levy S. 2022. Blake Lemoine Says Google’s LaMDA AI Faces “Bigotry. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/blake-lemoine-google-lamda-ai-bigotry/
   Google Scholar
• Liao SM. 2020. The moral status and rights of artificial intelligence. In: LiaoSM, editor. Ethics of artificial intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 480–504.
   Google Scholar
• Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. 2020. Explainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 23(1):18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard LA, Haber RJ. 1999. What do we mean by “relevance”? A clinical and rhetorical definition with implications for teaching and learning the case-presentation format. Acad Med. 74(10): S124–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig S, Gruber C, Ehlers JP, Ramspott S. 2020. Diversity in medical education. GMS J Med Educ. 37(2):Doc27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters K. 2009. Opening the closed-access medical journals: internet-based sharing of institutions’ access codes on a medical website. Internet J Med Inform. https://ispub.com/IJMI/5/2/6358.
   Google Scholar
• Masters K. 2019. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med Teach. 41(9):976–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters K. 2020a. Artificial Intelligence developments in medical education: a conceptual and practical framework. MedEdPublish. DOI:10.15694/mep.2020.000239.1
   Google Scholar
• Masters K. 2020b. Ethics in medical education digital scholarship. Med Teach. 42(3):252–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallister E, Grance T, Scarfone K. 2010. NIST Special Publication 800-122: guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institutes of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce, USA.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy J. 1955. A proposal for the dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. Hanover. http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/dartmouth/dartmouth.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Metz R. 2022. No, Google’s AI is not sentient. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/13/tech/google-ai-not-sentient/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Shmatikov V. 2009. De-anonymizing social networks. In: 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P'06). p. 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• OCR 2012. Guidance regarding methods for de-identification of protected health information in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Pusic MV, Birnbaum RJ, Thoma B, Hamstra SJ, Cavalcanti RB, Warm EJ, Janssen A, Shaw T. 2023. Frameworks for integrating learning analytics with the electronic health record. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 43(1):52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racism and Technology Center 2022. College voor de Rechten van de Mens oordeelt dat VU student het vermoeden van algoritmische discriminatie succesvol heeft onderbouwd: antispieksoftware is racistisch – Racism and Technology Center. https://racismandtechnology.center/2022/12/09/college-voor-de-rechten-van-de-mens-oordeelt-dat-vu-student-het-vermoeden-van-algoritmische-discriminatie-succesvol-heeft-onderbouwd-antispieksoftware-is-racistisch/.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton V, Mittelman M, Goldhahn J. 2020. Implications of artificial intelligence for medical education. Lancet Digit Health. 2(3):e111–e112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rettberg JW. 2022. ChatGPT is multilingual but monocultural, and it’s learning your values. https://jilltxt.net/right-now-chatgpt-is-multilingual-but-monocultural-but-its-learning-your-values/
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues R. 2020. Legal and human rights issues of AI: gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. J Responsible Technol. 4:100005.
   Google Scholar
• Sandars J, Brown J, Walsh K. 2017. Research or evaluation – does the difference matter? Educ Prim Care. 28(3):134–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawdon M, McLachlan J. 2020. ‘10% of your medical students will cause 90% of your problems’: a prospective correlational study. BMJ Open. 10(11):e038472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Horne A, Capellá J. 2012. Good data won’t guarantee good decisions. https://hbr.org/2012/04/good-data-wont-guarantee-good-decisions
   Google Scholar
• Straw I. 2020. The automation of bias in medical Artificial Intelligence (AI): decoding the past to create a better future. Artif Intell Med. 110:101965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet 2020. Bekendtgørelse af lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter og sundhedsdatavidenskabelige forskningsprojekter [Promulgation of the Act on the ethical treatment of health science research projects and health data science research projects - Author’s Translation] [Internet]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/1338.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp HH. 2023. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 379(6630):313–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunström AO. 2022. We Asked GPT-3 to Write an Academic Paper about Itself—Then We Tried to Get It Published. Sci Am. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-asked-gpt-3-to-write-an-academic-paper-about-itself-mdash-then-we-tried-to-get-it-published/
   Google Scholar
• Thunström AO, Steingrimsson S, Generative Pretrained Transformer G 2022. Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input? https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03701250
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay G, Carmichael P-H, Maziade J, Grégoire M. 2019. Detection of residents with progress issues using a keyword–specific algorithm. J Grad Med Educ. 11(6):656–662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turing A. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. LIX(236):433–460.
   Google Scholar
• USF 2023. Artificial intelligence writing [Internet]. https://fctl.ucf.edu/teaching-resources/promoting-academic-integrity/artificial-intelligence-writing/
   Google Scholar
• Vallance CT. 2022. UK decides AI still cannot patent inventions. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-61896180.
   Google Scholar
• Vinge V. 1993. Technological singularity. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.94.7856&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vogt L, Eaton SE. 2022. Make it someone’s job: documenting the growth of the academic integrity profession through a collection of position postings. Can Perspect Acad Integr. 5(1):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• WEF 2021. A Holistic Guide to Approaching AI Fairness Education in Organizations (World Economic Forum White Paper). Geneva: WEF.
   Google Scholar
• Wetsman N. 2022. A VR company is using an artificial patient group to test its chronic pain treatment. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/28/23044586/vr-chronic-pain-synthetic-clinical-trial-data
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox L. 2018. “Nothing about me without me”: investigating the health information access needs of adolescent patients. Interactions. 25(5):76–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten J-W, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 3:160018–160018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S, PROBAST Group† 2019. PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 170(1):51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar