1,946
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Twelve Tips

Twelve tips to develop entrustable professional activities

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abeyaratne C, Galbraith K. 2021. A review of entrustable professional activities in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ Educ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34911704/.
  • Acker S, Noelke A, Huckabee M, Rieck KM. 2021. Development of the proposed 13 entrustable professional activities for physician assistant graduates. J Physician Assist Educ. 32(4):232–236.
  • Bramley AL, McKenna L. 2021. Entrustable professional activities in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 55(9):1011–1032.
  • Carraccio C, Burke AE. 2010. Beyond competencies and milestones: adding meaning through context. J Grad Med Educ. 2(3):419–422.
  • Chen HC, ten Cate O. 2018. Assessment through entrustable professional activities. In: Delany C, Molloy E, editors. Learning & teaching in clinical contexts: a practical guide. Chatswood: Elsevier Australia; p. 286–304.
  • Cook DA. 2010. Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach. 32(4):296–301.
  • Corrigan C, Moran K, Kesten K, Conrad D, Manderscheid A, Beebe SL, Pohl E. 2022. Entrustable professional activities in clinical education. Nurse Educ. Publish Ah. 47(5):261–266.
  • Custer RL, Scarcella JA, Stewart BR. 1999. The modified Delphi technique – a rotational modification. J Vocat Tech Educ. 15(2):50–58.
  • Goldie J. 2006. AMEE Education Guide no. 29: Evaluating educational programmes. Med Teach. 28(3):210–224.
  • Harvey N, Holmes CA. 2012. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensusInt J Nurs Pract. 18:188–194.
  • Hatala R, Ginsburg S, Hauer KE, Gingerich A. 2019. Entrustment ratings in internal medicine training: capturing Meaningful supervision decisions or just another rating? J Gen Intern Med. 34(5):740–743.
  • Hennus MP, Dam M, Gauthier S, Taylor DR, Cate O. 2022. The logic behind EPA‐frameworks: a scoping review of the literature. Med Educ. 56(9):881–891.
  • Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, Wood TJ. 2017. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and nominal group in medical education research*. Med Teach. 39(1):14–19.
  • Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, Wang C, Foth T. 2017. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Acad Med. 92(10):1491–1498.
  • Klein K. 2006. Is your team too big? Too small? What’s the right number? Knowledge@Wharton [Internet]. [accessed 2022 May 16]. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/is-your-team-too-big-too-small-whats-the-right-number-2/.
  • Marty AP, Linsenmeyer M, George B, Young JQ, Breckwoldt J, ten CO. 2023. Mobile technologies to support workplace-based assessment for entrustment decisions: guidelines for programs and educators: AMEE Guide No. 154. Med Teach. DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2168527
  • Mathieu JE, Goodwin GF, Heffner TS, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol. 85(2):273–283.
  • Meyer EG, Chen HC, Uijtdehaage S, Durning SJ, Maggio LA. 2019. Scoping review of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 94(7):1040–1049.
  • Mulder H, ten Cate O, Daalder R, Berkvens J. 2010. Building a competency-based workplace curriculum around entrustable professional activities: the case of physician assistant training. Med Teach. 32(10):e453-9. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2010.513719.
  • O'Dowd E, Lydon S, O'Connor P, Madden C, Byrne D. 2019. A systematic review of 7 years of research on entrustable professional activities in graduate medical education, 2011–2018. Med Educ. 53(3):234–249.
  • Pinilla S, Lenouvel E, Cantisani A, Klöppel S, Strik W, Huwendiek S, Nissen C. 2021. Working with entrustable professional activities in clinical education in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 21(1):1–10.
  • Post JA, Wittich CM, Thomas KG, Dupras DM, Halvorsen AJ, Mandrekar JN, Oxentenko AS, Beckman TJ. 2016. Rating the quality of entrustable professional activities: content validation and associations with the clinical context. J Gen Intern Med. 31(5):518–541.
  • Shorey S, Lau TC, Lau ST, Ang E. 2019. Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 53(8):766–777.
  • Spencer M, Sherbino J, Hatala R. 2022. Examining the validity argument for the Ottawa surgical competency operating room evaluation (OSCORE): a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 27:659–689.
  • Sterkenburg A, Barach P, Kalkman C, Gielen M, Ten CO. 2010. When do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? Acad Med. 85(9):1408–1417.
  • Taylor DR. 2017. EQual rubric training video for EPA evaluation [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Mar 15]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQZuWdzkQKM.
  • Taylor DR, Park YS, Egan R, Chan MK, Karpinski J, Touchie C, Snell LS, Tekian A. 2017. EQual, a novel rubric to evaluate entrustable professional activities for quality and structure. Acad Med. 92(11):S110–S117.
  • ten Cate O. 2005. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 39(12):1176–1177.
  • ten Cate O. 2006. Trust, competence, and the supervisor’s role in postgraduate training. Br Med J. 333(7571):746–748.
  • ten Cate O. 2013. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. J Grad Med Educ [Internet]. 5(1):157–158.
  • ten Cate O. 2019. An updated primer on entrustable professional activities (EPAs). Rev Bras Educ Med. 43:712–720.
  • ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, Van Der Schaaf M. 2015. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 37(11):983–1002.
  • ten Cate O, Graafmans L, Posthumus I, Welink L, van Dijk M. 2018. The EPA-based Utrecht undergraduate clinical curriculum: development and implementation. Med Teach. [Internet]. [40(5):506–513. accessed 2019 Jan 21]
  • ten Cate O, Pool IA. 2019. The viability of interprofessional entrustable professional activities. Adv Health Sci Educ. 25(5):1255–1262.
  • ten Cate O, Scheele F. 2007. Viewpoint: competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med. 82(6):542–547.
  • ten Cate O, Schumacher DJ. 2022. Entrustable professional activities versus competencies and skills : exploring why different concepts are often conflated. Adv Health Sci Educ. 27(2):491–499..
  • ten Cate O, Schwartz A, Chen HC. 2020. Assessing trainees and making entrustment decisions: on the nature and use of entrustment-supervision scales. Acad Med. 95(11):1662–1669.
  • ten Cate O, Taylor DR. 2020. The recommended description of an entrustable professional activity: AMEE Guide No. 140. Med Teach. [Internet]. 0(0):1–9.
  • Touchie C, ten Cate O. 2016. The promise, perils, problems and progress of competency-based medical education. Med Educ. 50(1):93–100.
  • Turoff M. 2002. The Delphi method: techniques and Applications. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M, editors. The Delphi method Techniques and Applications. Vol. 13. [Boston (MA): Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; pp. 80–96.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.