Examining self-regulation as a potential intervention for moral grandstanding on social networking sites

References

• Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2010). Social context and the self-regulation of implicit bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209353635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio, D. M., & Swencionis, J. K. (2018). Proactive control of implicit bias: A theoretical model and implications for behavior change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Auxier, B. (2020, August 19). 55% of US social media users say they are ‘worn out’ by political posts and discussions. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/19/55-of-u-s-social-media-users-say-they-are-worn-out-by-political-posts-and-discussions/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. P., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. P., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2020, February 21). Many tech experts say digital disruption will hurt democracy. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/21/many-tech-experts-say-digital-disruption-will-hurt-democracy/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. P., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. C., Walker, K. L., & Kees, J. (2020). Children and online privacy protection: Empowerment from cognitive defense strategies. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915619883638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino, K., & Reed, A., III. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auxier, B. (2020, October 15). 64% of Americans say social media have a mostly negative effect on the way things are going in the US today. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/15/64-of-americans-say-social-media-have-a-mostly-negative-effect-on-the-way-things-are-going-in-the-u-s-today/
   Google Scholar
• Baer, D. (2022, February 1). List of the 52 Largest Facebook Groups (2022 update). OneUp blog – social media marketing resources. https://blog.oneupapp.io/largest-fb-groups/
   Google Scholar
• Bai, F. (2017). Beyond dominance and competence: A moral virtue theory of status attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316649297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, F., Ho, G. C. C., & Yan, J. (2020). Does virtue lead to status? Testing the moral virtue theory of status attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 501–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Báles, R. F., Strodbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16(4), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-RegulatIon and the executive function: the self as controlling agent. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 516–539). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020). Uniting the tribes: Using text for marketing insight. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919873106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. (2023, August 28). Effects of cyberbullying. Social Media Victims Law Center. https://socialmediavictims.org/cyberbullying/effects/
   Google Scholar
• Birau, M. M., Hildebrand, D., & Werle, C. O. C. (2022). How communications that portray unhealthy food consumption reduce food intake among dieters. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156211019035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bor, A., & Peterson, M. B. (2022). The psychology of online political hostility: A comprehensive, cross-national test of the mismatch hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bountyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., Ashokkumar, A., Seraj, S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2022). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 978–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620917336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calanchini, J., Lai, C. K., & Klauer, K. C. (2021). Reducing implicit racial preferences: III. A process-level examination of changes in implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(4), 796–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1982). The concept of external validity. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1086/208920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Schaafsma, J., & Antheunis, M. (2018). Under the bridge: An in- depth examination of online trolling in the gaming context. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3323–3340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817748578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, C. K., & Srivastava, S. (2021). Perceiving personality through the grapevine: A network approach to reputations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 121(1), 151–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behavior, 1(11), 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, K., Galande, A. S., Chylinski, M., & Mathmann, F. (2021). Power and the tweet: How viral messaging conveys political advantage. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915621999036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (2019). A new, online culture war? The communication world of Breitbart.com. Communication Research & Practice, 5(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1558790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsar, V., Brace-Govan, J., Jack, G., & Sands, S. (2021). The social phenomenon of trolling: Understanding the discourse and social practices of online provocation. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(11–12), 1058–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2021.1900335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsar, V., Sands, S., Campbell, C., & Pitt, L. F. (2021). Unprecedented,” “extraordinary,” and “we’re all in this together”: Does advertising really need to be so tedious in challenging times? Business Horizons, 64(4), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2017). EBOOK: The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, D. M. (2016). Doxing: A conceptual analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9406-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, B. D., Ewell, P. J., Brauer, M., & Hallam, J. S. (2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLoS One, 18(3), e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter?-An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 941–982). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Social power. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 678–692). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerree, A. K., & Satta, M. (2023). Moral grandstanding and the norms of moral discourse. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2023.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T., & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golf-Papez, M., & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t feed the trolling: Rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15–16), 1336–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2017.1383298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., & Lelkes, Y. (2023). Do social media undermine social cohesion? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 17(1), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Paolacci, G., Dahl, D., Fischer, E., Johar, G., & Morwitz, V. (2017). Crowdsourcing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoropoulou, N. (2020). Discussing god: The effect of (Ir)religious identities on topic-sentiment polarization in online debates. Review of Religious Research, 62(4), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-020-00425-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. In J. N. Sheth & N. K. Malhotra (Eds.), Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057
   Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., James, A. S., Warmke, B., & Tosi, J. (2022). Moral grandstanding, narcissism, and self-reported responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Research in Personality, 97, 104187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., & James, A. S. (2020). Moral grandstanding and political polarization: A multi-study consideration. Journal of Research in Personality, 88(August 24), 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104009
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., James, A. S., Campbell, W. K., & Wetherell, G. (2019, October). Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict. PLoS One, 14(10), e0223749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386610380991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Geube, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A. (2020, October 15). Facebook releases new insights on groups usage during COVID-19. Social Media Today. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/facebook-releases-new-insights-on-groups-usage-during-covid-19/587146/
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, R. B., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Consumer response to a five-year campaign to combat air pollution. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(1), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2021). Cyber bullying—Statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/1809/cyber-bullying/#dossierKeyfigures
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K. N., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2015). SeekIng power, finding friends, and making the grade: Drive orientations of the primary frontrunners. Wordwatchers. https://wordwatchers.wordpress.com/2015/11/16/seeking-power-finding-friends-and-making-the-grade-drive-orientations-of-the-primary-frontrunners/
   Google Scholar
• Kees, J., Fitzgerald, P., Dorsey, J. D., & Hill, R. P. (2019). Evidence-based cannabis policy: A framework to guide marketing and public policy research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915619848422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, P. W., Krupnikov, Y., Milita, K., Ryan, J. B., & Soroka, S. (2020). Social media and the changing information environment: Sentiment differences in read versus recirculated news content. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa015
   Google Scholar
• Kyrios, M. (2008). An examination of psychosocial factors associated with compulsive buying. In M. W. Todman (Ed.), Self-regulation and social competence: Psychological studies in identity, achievement, and work-family dynamics (pp. 47–64). ATINER.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group Virtue: The Importance of Morality (vs. Competence and Sociability) in the Positive Evaluation of In-Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liptak, A. (2022, November 2). In 6-to-3 ruling, supreme court ends nearly 50 years of abortion rights. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/24/us/roe-wade-overturned-supreme-court.html
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Lin, X., Wang, X., & Wang, T. (2022). Self‐regulation deficiency in predicting problematic use of mobile social networking apps: The role of media dependency. Decision Sciences, 53(5), 827–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumer, C. (1995). Rules and moral norms in sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 30(3–4), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/101269029503000303
   Google Scholar
• Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malanchini, M., Engelhardt, L. E., Grotzinger, A. D., Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2019). “Same but different”: Associations between multiple aspects of self-regulation, cognition, and academic abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), 1164–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, E. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the Internet troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141(15), 133–137.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P. M., & Boonthum-Denecke, C. (Eds.). (2012). Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation and resolution. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Integration of construct and external validity by means of proximal similarity: Implications for laboratory experiments in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00298-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, B. (2023, July 10). Column: Social media promised us democracy—But gave us dictatorships. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-07-10/column-social-media-promised-us-democracy-and-gave-us-dictatorship
   Google Scholar
• Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 269, 881–883. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.1964
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Yannakoudakis, H., & Shutova, E. (2020). TackliNg online abuse: A survey of automated abuse detection methods (arXiv: 1908.06024). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06024
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, S. J., Crocker, J., & Bushman, B. J. (2009). Creating hostility and conflict: Effects of entitlement and self-image goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteith, M. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, A. C., Amir, O., Lee, L., Dahl, D., Fischer, E., Johar, G., & Morwitz, V. (2017). Keeping it real in experimental research—Understanding when, where, and how to enhance realism and measure consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, S. R., Roberts, L. D., Sheridan, L., Coleman, A. R., & Gallotti, R. (2023). Examining the role of moral, emotional, behavioural, and personality factors in predicting online shaming. PLoS One, 18(3), e0279750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. (2016). 2015 US transgender survey report. National Center for Transgender Equality. https://vawnet.org/material/2015-us-transgender-survey-report
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, S. (2012). Cyber-bullying and trolling. Youth Studies Australia, 31(4), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S36456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyst, A. (2023, July 14). 134 social media statistics you need to know for 2023. Search Engine Journal. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/social-media-statistics/480507/#close
   Google Scholar
• Otten, S. (2016). The Minimal Group Paradigm and its maximal impact in research on social categorization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz, M. A., Montero-Díaz, J., & Moreno-Delgado, A. (2020). Hate speech: A systematized review. SAGE Open, 10(4), 2158244020973022. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2015 operator’s manual. Pennebaker Conglomerates.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Bor, A. (2021). Beyond populism: The psychology of status-seeking and extreme political discontent. In Joseph P. Forgas, William D. Crano, Klaus Fiedler (Eds), The psychology of populism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. B., & Bor, A. (2021, October 27). Actually, Facebook isn’t making people angrier. Some people are just jerks. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/27/actually-facebook-isnt-making-people-angrier-some-people-are-just-jerks/
   Google Scholar
• Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., & Smith, A. (2011). Section 3: How the internet is used in groups—and the rise of social medi and texting in group activities. In The social side of the internet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/01/18/section-3-how-the-internet-is-used-in-groups-and-the-rise-of-social-media-and-texting-in-group-activities/
   Google Scholar
• Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S. (2022, July 12). Cyberbullying linked with suicidal thoughts and attempts in young adolescents. National Institutes of Health. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/cyberbullying-linked-suicidal-thoughts-attempts-young-adolescents
   Google Scholar
• Romera, E. M., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Runions, K., & Falla, D. (2021). Moral disengagement strategies in online and offline bullying. Psychosocial Intervention, 30(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, E. F., Sheridan-Johnson, J., Maitra, P., Shulruff, T., Sniffen, C. K., & Mumford, E. A. (2023). Stress, suicidality, post-traumatic stress disorder, emotional distress, and social isolation among US Adults experiencing online abuse or harassment. Violence and Gender, 10(3), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2022.0053
   Google Scholar
• Sambaraju, R., & McVittie, C. (2020). Examining abuse in online media. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savejnarong, T., Pornsukjantra, P., & Manley, H. (2022). The interpersonal consequences of prestige and dominance-based moral grandstanding. Personality and Individual Differences, 194, 111656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaoka, T., & Monin, B. (2018). The paradox of viral outrage. Psychological Science, 29(10), 1665–1678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618780658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Social identity theory. Social Psychology in Action: Evidence-Based Interventions from Theory to Practice, 129–143.
   Google Scholar
• Shapka, J. D., & Law, D. M. (2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhapakdi, A., & LaTour, M. S. (1991). The link between social responsibility orientation, motive appeals, and voting intention: A case of an anti-littering campaign. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, F., Nurse, J. R., & Arief, B. (2021). Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(6), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, J., & Kurek, A. (2019). Looking hot in selfies: Narcissistic beginnings, aggressive outcomes? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419865621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó, G., & Samoilenko, S. (2022). Call for papers: Morality in political and public debates. What is beyond moral framing? American Behavioral Scientist, Special Issue. https://nordmedianetwork.org/latest/call-for-papers/morality-in-political-and-public-debates-what-is-beyond-moral-framing/
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader. (pp. 33–47). OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Torelli, C. J., Leslie, L. M., Stoner, J. L., & Puente, R. (2014). Cultural determinants of status: Implications for workplace evaluations and behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, J., & Warmke, B. (2016). Moral grandstanding. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 44(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, J., & Warmke, B. (2020a). Moral grandstanding as a threat to free expression. Social Philosophy and Policy, 37(2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052521000108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, J., & Warmke, B. (2020b). Moral grandstanding: The use and abuse of moral talk. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Geel, M., Goemans, A., Toprak, F., & Vedder, P. (2017). Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the big five, dark triad and sadism. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, M., Sridharan, S., Gau, R., & Ritchie, R. (2009). Designing marketplace literacy education in resource-constrained contexts: Implications for public policy and marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.28.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in‐group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust‐related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 265–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206.
   Google Scholar
• Vogels, E. A. (2021, January 13). The State of online harassment. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
   Google Scholar
• Voinea, C., & Uszkai, R. (2020). Do companies engage in moral grandstanding? Management and Sustainable Organizations, 14, 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.24818/IMC/2020/05.13
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. L., Seibert, S. E., Goering, D., & O’Boyle, E. H., Jr. (2019). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9552-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure†. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Sirianni, A. D., Tang, S., Zheng, Z., & Fu, F. (2020). Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases. Physical Review X, 10(4), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, T. J., Hydock, C., Ding, W., Gardner, M., Jacob, P., Mandel, N., Sprott, D. E., & Van Steenburg, E. (2021). Political polarization: Challenges, opportunities, and hope for consumer welfare, marketers, and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915621991103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, G., Moon, J., & Grant, B. (2013). Corporations and citizenship arenas in the age of social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(4), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1960-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & McGonagle, A. K. (2016). Four research designs and a comprehensive analysis strategy for investigating common method variance with self-report measures using latent variables. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9422-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2014). Ethics in the virtual world: The morality and psychology of gaming. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaki, M., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2020). Text mining analysis roadmap (TMAR) for service research. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2019-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar