Prospects and application of nanobiotechnology in food preservation: molecular perspectives

References

• Sekhon BS. Nanotechnology in agri-food production: an overview. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2014;7:31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salvia-Trujillo L, Rojas-Graü MA, Soliva-Fortuny R, et al. Impact of microfluidization or ultrasound processing on the antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli of lemongrass oil-loaded nanoemulsions. Food Control. 2014;37:292–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry Q, Scotter M, Blackburn J, et al. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008;25:241–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozafari MR, Khosravi-Darani K, Borazan GG, et al. Encapsulation of food ingredients using nanoliposome technology. Int J Food Prop. 2008;11:833–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Peng S, Liu W, et al. A novel delivery system dextran sulfate coated amphiphilic chitosan derivatives-based nanoliposome: capacity to improve in vitro digestion stability of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate. Food Res Int. 2015;69:114–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherkhani S, Mohammadi M, Daoud J, et al. Covalent binding of nanoliposomes to the surface of magnetotactic bacteria for the synthesis of self-propelled therapeutic agents. ACS Nano. 2014;8:5049–5060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Wang Z, Zhao W, et al. Enhanced bactericidal potency of nanoliposomes by modification of the fusion activity between liposomes and bacterium. Int J Nanomed. 2013;8:2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, et al. Nanoemulsions: formation, properties and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12:2826–2841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClements DJ, Rao J. Food-grade nanoemulsions: formulation, fabrication, properties, performance, biological fate, and potential toxicity. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2011;51:285–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becaro AA, Puti FC, Correa DS, et al. Polyethylene films containing silver nanoparticles for applications in food packaging: characterization of physico-chemical and anti-microbial properties. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15:2148–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metak MM. Effects of nanocomposite based nano-silver and nano-titanium dioxide on food packaging materials. Int J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;5:26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Echegoyen Y, Nerín C. Nanoparticle release from nano-silver antimicrobial food containers. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;62:16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy M, Ting K, Zhang X, et al. Current development of silver nanoparticle preparation, investigation, and application in the field of medicine. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, et al. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:2346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molière N, Turgay K. General and regulatory proteolysis in Bacillus subtilis. In: Dougan DA, editor. Regulated proteolysis in microorganisms. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 73–103.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim HM. Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using banana peel extract and their antimicrobial activity against representative microorganisms. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2015;8:265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijakovic I, Deutscher J. Protein-tyrosine phosphorylation in Bacillus subtilis: a 10-year retrospective. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawengkijwanich C, Hayata Y. Performance of TiO2 powder coated packaging film in ethylene removal. Acta Hortic. 2007;804:541–546.
   Google Scholar
• Yemmireddy VK, Hung YC. Effect of binder on the physical stability and bactericidal property of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanocoatings on food contact surfaces. Food Control. 2015;57:82–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozmuta AM, Peter A, Cozmuta LM, et al. Active packaging system based on Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite used for extending the shelf life of bread. Chem Microbiol Investig Packag Technol Sci. 2015;28:271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathakoti K, Morrow S, Han C, et al. Photoinactivation of Escherichia coli by sulfur-doped and nitrogen–fluorine-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles under solar simulated light and visible light irradiation. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:9988–9996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:2242–2250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page K, Palgrave RG, Parkin IP, et al. Titania and silver–titania composite films on glass—potent antimicrobial coatings. J Mater Chem. 2007;17:95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanmani P, Rhim JW. Properties and characterization of bionanocomposite films prepared with various biopolymers and ZnO nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;106:190–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafchi AM, Nassiri R, Sheibani S, et al. Preparation and characterization of bionanocomposite films filled with nanorod-rich zinc oxide. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;96:233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panea BG, Ripoll González J, Fernández-Cuello A, et al. Effect of nanocomposite packaging containing different proportions of ZnO and Ag on chicken breast meat quality. J. Food Eng. 2014;123:104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastarrachea L, Dhawan S, Sablani SS. Engineering properties of polymeric-based antimicrobial films for food packaging: a review. Food Eng Rev. 2011;3:79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihindukulasuriya SD, Lim LT. Nanotechnology development in food packaging: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2014;40:149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal D, Bhowmick B, Mollick MM, et al. Effect of clay concentration on morphology and properties of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose films. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;96:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luduena LN, Alvarez VA, Vazquez A. Processing and microstructure of PCL/clay nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater. 2007;460:121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss J, Takhistov P, McClements DJ. Functional materials in food nanotechnology. J Food Sci. 2006;71:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitinis N, Fortunati E, Verdejo R, et al. Thermal and bio-disintegration properties of poly (lactic acid)/natural rubber/organoclay nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci. 2014;93:78–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertuoli PT, Piazza D, Scienza LC, et al. Preparation and characterization of montmorillonite modified with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Appl Clay Sci. 2014;87:46–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan W, Zhang Y, Szeto YS, et al. A novel method to prepare chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposites in the presence of hydroxy-aluminum oligomeric cations. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68:2917–2921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montazer M, Harifi T. New approaches and future aspects of antibacterial food packaging: from nanoparticles coating to nanofibers and nanocomposites, with foresight to address the regulatory uncertainty. Food Packaging. 2017;533–565.
   Google Scholar
• Picouet PA, Fernandez A, Realini CE, et al. Influence of PA6 nanocomposite films on the stability of vacuum-aged beef loins during storage in modified atmospheres. Meat Sci. 2014;96:574–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammariello D, Conte A, Buonocore GG, et al. Bio-based nanocomposite coating to preserve quality of Fior di latte cheese. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:5298–5304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen LE. Models for the permeability of filled polymer systems. J Macromol Sci Chem. 1967;1:929–942.
   Google Scholar
• Zare Y, Garmabi H. Thickness, modulus and strength of interphase in clay/polymer nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci. 2015;105:66–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marelli B, Brenckle MA, Kaplan DL, et al. Silk fibroin as edible coating for perishable food preservation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:252–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Kim S, Puligundla P, et al. Carbon dioxide and oxygen gas sensors-possible application for monitoring quality, freshness, and safety of agricultural and food products with emphasis on importance of analytical signals and their transformation. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2014;57:723–733.
   Google Scholar
• Kader AA. Biochemical and physiological basis for effects of controlled and modified atmospheres on fruits and vegetables. Food Technol. 1986;40:99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo Y. Ethylene, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and temperature in postharvest physiology. In: Yoshinori K, Alexey K, editors. Abiotic stress biology in horticultural plants. Tokyo: Springer; 2015. p. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Liplap P, Vigneault C, Toivonen P, et al. Effect of hyperbaric pressure and temperature on respiration rates and quality attributes of tomato. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2013;86:240–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip WK, Yang SF. Cyanide metabolism in relation to ethylene production in plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 1988;88:473–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thewes FR, Both V, Brackmann A, et al. Dynamic controlled atmosphere and ultralow oxygen storage on 'Gala' mutants quality maintenance. Food Chem. 2015;188:62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burg SP, Burg EA. Molecular requirements for the biological activity of ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1967;42:144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Estaca J, Lopez-de-Dicastillo C, Hernández-Muñoz P, et al. Advances in antioxidant active food packaging. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2014;35:42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhall RK. Advances in edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53:435–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushen M, Kerry J, Morris M, et al. Nanotechnologies in the food industry–Recent developments, risks and regulation. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2012;24:30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone M, Donia DT, Sabbatella G, et al. Silver nanoparticles in polymeric matrices for fresh food packaging. J King Saud Univ-Sci. 2016;28:273–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JH. Edible films and coatings: a review. In Han J, editor. Innovations in Food Packaging, 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press; 2014. p. 213–255.
   Google Scholar
• Paladugu K, Gunasekaran K. Development of gum arabic edible coating formulation through nanotechnological approaches and their effect on physico-chemical change in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit during storage. Int J Agr Sci. 2017;9:3866–3870.
   Google Scholar
• Shit SC, Shah PM. Edible polymers: challenges and opportunities. J Polym. 2014;2014:1.
   Google Scholar
• Otoni CG, Avena‐Bustillos RJ, et al. Recent advances on edible films based on fruits and vegetables – a review. Comp Rev Food Sci and Food Saf. 2017;16:1151–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kester JJ, Fennema OR. Edible films and coatings: a review. Food Technol. 1986;40:47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira MR, Cassani L, Martín-Belloso O, et al. Effects of polysaccharide-based edible coatings enriched with dietary fiber on quality attributes of fresh-cut apples. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52:7795–7805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarakhsh N, Osman A, Ghazali HM, et al. Lemongrass essential oil incorporated into alginate-based edible coating for shelf-life extension and quality retention of fresh-cut pineapple. Postharvest Biol Tech. 2014;88:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelman N, Ragaert P, De Meulenaer B, et al. Application of bioplastics for food packaging. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2013;32:128–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Abad A, Ocio MJ, Lagarón JM, et al. Evaluation of silver-infused polylactide films for inactivation of Salmonella and feline calicivirus in vitro and on fresh-cut vegetables. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;162:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorda-Beneyto M, Ortuño N, Devis A, et al. Use of nanoclay platelets in food packaging materials: technical and cytotoxicity approach. Food Addit Contam Part A. 2014;31:354–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisanaba S, Gutiérrez-Praena D, Puerto M, et al. In vivo toxicity evaluation of the migration extract of an organomodified clay–poly (lactic) acid nanocomposite. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2014;77:731–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groh KJ, Geueke B, Muncke J. Food contact materials and gut health: implications for toxicity assessment and relevance of high molecular weight migrants. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;109:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnuson B, Munro I, Abbot P, et al. Review of the regulation and safety assessment of food substances in various countries and jurisdictions. Food Addit Contam Part A. 2013;30:1147–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neltner TG, Alger HM, Leonard JE, et al. Data gaps in toxicity testing of chemicals allowed in food in the United States. Reprod Toxicol. 2013;42:85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisanaba S, Puerto M, Pichardo S, et al. In vitro toxicological assessment of clays for their use in food packaging applications. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;57:266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtman J, Maisanaba S, Puerto M, et al. Toxicity assessment of organomodified clays used in food contact materials on human target cell lines. Appl Clay Sci. 2014;90:150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisanaba S, Guzmán-Guillén R, Puerto M, et al. In vitro toxicity evaluation of new silane-modified clays and the migration extract from a derived polymer-clay nanocomposite intended to food packaging applications. J Hazard Mater. 2018;341:313–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AK, Schmidt B, Frandsen H, et al. Genotoxicity of unmodified and organo-modified montmorillonite. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2010;700:18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandelli A. Toxicity and safety evaluation of nanoclays. In: Rai M, Biswas JK, editors. Nanomaterials: ecotoxicity, safety, and public perception. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Maisanaba S, Pichardo S, Jordá-Beneyto M, et al. Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity studies on migration extracts from nanocomposites with potential use in food packaging. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;66:366–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority, EFSA. Recent developments in the risk assessment of chemicals in food and their potential impact on the safety assessment of substances used in food contact materials. Efsa J. 2016;14:4357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston HJ, Hutchison G, Christensen FM, et al. A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010;40:328–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León-Silva S, Fernández-Luqueño F, López-Valdez F. Silver Nanoparticles (AgNP) in the environment: a review of potential risks on human and environmental health. Water Air Soil Poll. 2016;227:306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong WH, Van Der Ven LT, Sleijffers A, et al. Systemic and immunotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in an intravenous 28 days repeated dose toxicity study in rats. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8333–8343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski CA. Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2004;1:337–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lees P, Cunningham FM, Elliott J. Principles of pharmacodynamics and their applications in veterinary pharmacology. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2004;27:397–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agehara S, Crosby K, Holcroft D, et al. Optimizing 1-methylcyclopropene concentration and immersion time to extend shelf life of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) fruit. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018;230:117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GS, Gravett IM, Edwards CM, et al. Spatial analysis of the canopy of kiwifruit vines as it relates to the physical, chemical and postharvest attributes of the fruit. Ann Bot. 1994;73:99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Giri SK, Kotwaliwale N. Shelf-life enhancement of green bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under active modified atmosphere storage. Food Pack Shelf Life. 2014;1:101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Paul V, Pandey R. Role of internal atmosphere on fruit ripening and storability-a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51:1223–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveh R, Li YS, Ranjbar S, et al. Changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression in response to silver nanoparticles and silver ions. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:10637–10644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman T, Schmidt JS, Zheng X, et al. Isolation of ethylene-insensitive soybean mutants that are altered in pathogen susceptibility and gene-for-gene disease resistance. Plant Physiol. 1999;119:935–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho-Cristóbal JJ, Martín-Rejano EM, Herrera-Rodríguez MB, et al. Boron deficiency inhibits root cell elongation via an ethylene/auxin/ROS-dependent pathway in Arabidopsis seedlings. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:3831–3840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasur J, Rani PU. Environmental effects of nanosilver: impact on castor seed germination, seedling growth, and plant physiology. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20:8636–8648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuesombat P, Hannongbua S, Akasit S, et al. Effect of silver nanoparticles on rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML 105) seed germination and seedling growth. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;104:302–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Lombi E, Sun S, et al. Characterizing the uptake, accumulation and toxicity of silver sulfide nanoparticles in plants. Environ Sci: Nano. 2017;4:448–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry E. Ultrastructure of epicuticular wax aggregates during fruit development in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2005;80:668–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch K, Ensikat HJ. The hydrophobic coatings of plant surfaces: epicuticular wax crystals and their morphologies, crystallinity and molecular self-assembly. Micron. 2008;39:759–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood RC. Recent developments in our understanding of the plant cuticle as a barrier to the foliar uptake of pesticides†. Pestic Sci. 1999;55:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Buschhaus C, Jetter R. Composition differences between epicuticular and intracuticular wax substructures: how do plants seal their epidermal surfaces? J Exp Bot. 2011;62:841–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynhardt EC. The role of hydrogen bonding in the cuticular wax of Hordeum vulgare L. Eur Biophys J. 1997;26:195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelachvili J, Pashley R. The hydrophobic interaction is long range, decaying exponentially with distance. Nature. 1982;300:341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dashevsky VG, Sarkisov GN. The solvation and hydrophobic interaction of non-polar molecules in water in the approximation of interatomic potentials: the Monte Carlo method. Mol Phys. 1974;27:1271–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Naim A, Wilf J, Yaacobi M. Hydrophobic interaction in light and heavy water. J Phys Chem. 1973;77:95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer EE, Rosenberg KJ, Israelachvili J. Recent progress in understanding hydrophobic interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15739–15746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelachvili JN. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi DA, Watkins EB, Israelachvili JN, et al. Reduced water density at hydrophobic surfaces: effect of dissolved gases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9458–9462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangaran K, Tomasula PM, Qi P. Structure and function of protein-based edible films and coatings. In: Huber KC, Embuscado ME, editors. Edible films and coatings for food applications. New York, NY: Springer; 2009;p. 25–56.
   Google Scholar
• Avena-Bustillos RJ, Krochta JM. Water vapor permeability of caseinate‐based edible films as affected by pH, calcium crosslinking and lipid content. J Food Sci. 1993;58:904–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maté JI, Krochta JM. Comparison of oxygen and water vapor permeabilities of whey protein isolate and β-lactoglobulin edible films. J Agric Food Chem. 1996;44:3001–3004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade R, Skurtys O, Osorio F, et al. Wettability of gelatin coating formulations containing cellulose nanofibers on banana and eggplant epicarps. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2014;58:158–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SY, Rhee C. Mechanical properties and water vapor permeability of edible films made from fractionated soy proteins with ultrafiltration. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2004;37:833–839.
   Google Scholar
• Hagenmaier RD, Shaw PE. Moisture permeability of edible films made with fatty acid and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose. J Agric Food Chem. 1990;38:1799–1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller CL, Gennadios A, Saraiva RA. Edible bilayer films from zein and grain sorghum wax or carnauba wax. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 1998;31:279–285.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez A, Fabra MJ, Talens P, et al. Effect of lipid self-association on the microstructure and physical properties of hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose edible films containing fatty acids. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;82:585–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravin B, Peressini D, Sensidoni A. Development and application of polysaccharide–lipid edible coating to extend shelf-life of dry bakery products. J Food Eng. 2006;76:280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péroval C, Debeaufort F, Despré D, et al. Edible arabinoxylan-based films. 1. effects of lipid type on water vapor permeability, film structure, and other physical characteristics. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:3977–3983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acevedo-Fani A, Salvia-Trujillo L, Rojas-Graü MA, et al. Edible films from essential-oil-loaded nanoemulsions: physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;47:168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelz T, Lesmes U, Weiss J, et al. Modulation of physicochemical properties of lipid droplets using β-lactoglobulin and/or lactoferrin interfacial coatings. Food Hydrocoll. 2011;25:1181–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh TH. Protein-lipid interactions in edible films and coatings. Nahrung. 2000;44:148–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benjamin O, Lassé M, Silcock P, et al. Effect of pectin adsorption on the hydrophobic binding sites of β-lactoglobulin in solution and in emulsion systems. Int Dairy J. 2012;26:36–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de S. Medeiros BG, Pinheiro AC, Carneiro-da-Cunha MG, et al. Development and characterization of a nanomultilayer coating of pectin and chitosan – Evaluation of its gas barrier properties and application on ‘Tommy Atkins’ mangoes. J Food Eng. 2012;110:457–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty T, Chakraborty I, Ghosh S. Sodium carboxymethylcellulose − CTAB interaction: a detailed thermodynamic study of polymer − surfactant interaction with opposite charges. Langmuir. 2006;22:9905–9913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García MA, Martino MN, Zaritzky NE. Lipid addition to improve barrier properties of edible starch‐based films and coatings. J Food Sci. 2000;65:941–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha AG, Gandini A. Turning polysaccharides into hydrophobic materials: a critical review. Part 2. Hemicelluloses, chitin/chitosan, starch, pectin and alginates. Cellulose. 2010;17:1045–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senturk Parreidt T, Schmid M, Hauser C. Validation of a novel technique and evaluation of the surface free energy of food. Foods. 2017;6:31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Ashkarran AA, et al. Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:499–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh AJ, Kwon YJ. “Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J Control Rel. 2011;156:128–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smekalova M, Aragon V, Panacek A, et al. Enhanced antibacterial effect of antibiotics in combination with silver nanoparticles against animal pathogens. Vet J. 2016;209:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1712–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper P, Mahe Y, Thompson S, et al. The Pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast. Embo J. 1998;17:4257–4265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper P, Calderon CO, Hatzixanthis K, et al. Weak acid adaptation: the stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives. Microbiology. 2001;147:2635–2642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouch DA, Lee BT, Morby AP. Understanding cellular responses to toxic agents: a model for mechanism-choice in bacterial metal resistance. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995;14:132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh G, Das RK, Kaur Brar S, et al. Alternatives to antibiotics in poultry feed: molecular perspectives. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017;44:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panáček A, Kvítek L, Smékalová M, et al. Bacterial resistance to silver nanoparticles and how to overcome it. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13:65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar