Vocabulary to Support Socially-Valued Adult Roles

References

• Atanasoff L. M., McNaughton D., Wolfe P. S., Light J. Communication demands of university settings for students using augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 1998; 13(3)32–47
   Google Scholar
• Balandin S. A., Iacono T. Symbol vocabularies: A study of vocabularies found on communication boards used by adults with cerebral palsy. Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities. The Crippled Children's Association of South Africa, Inc, AdelaideAustralia 1993; 85–87
   Google Scholar
• Balandin S. A., Iacono T. Crews, wusses, and whoppas: Core and fringe vocabularies of Australian meal-break conversations in the workplace. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 95–105
   Google Scholar
• Benajee M., Dicarlo C., Stricklin B. S. Core vocabulary determination for toddlers. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 67–73
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., McGinnis J., Morrow D. Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 171–185
   Google Scholar
• Bryen D. N. AAC Vocabulary for Socially-valued Adult Roles. 2008, Retrieved 15 April 2008 from: http://disabilities.temple.edu/aacvoc
   Google Scholar
• Bryen D. N., Moulton B. Why ‘employment, independence, marriage, and sexuality’? Because we want it all!. The Sixth Annual Pittsburgh Employment Conference for Augmented Communicators, R. V. Conti, C. Jenkins-Odorisio. SHOUT Press, Pittsburgh, PA 1999; 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Bryen D., Carey A., Frantz B. Ending the silence: Adults who use augmentative communication and their experiences as victims of crimes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 125–134
   Google Scholar
• Bryen D. N., Carey A., Potts B. Technology and job-related social networks. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M., McConachie H., Price K., Wood P. J. Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 36 2001; 107–115
   Google Scholar
• Collier B. Safeguarding people who use augmentative communication from sexual abuse victimization. Speak Up Project, TorontoCanada 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fallon K., Light J., Paige T. K. Enhancing vocabulary selection for preschoolers who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 10: 81–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar P. End the Silence: Preventing the sexual abuse of women with communication disabilities: Developing a community response. Canada, The Technical Resource Center, Alberta 1996
   Google Scholar
• Fine M., Asch A. Introduction: Beyond pedestals:. Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics, M. Fine, A. Asch. Temple University Press, Philadelphia 1988
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham J. AAC WebCrawling-communication content from the Internet. 2007, Retrieved 6 October 2007 from: http://www.aacrerc.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102&Itemid=117
   Google Scholar
• Hill K., Romich B. AAC automated language activity monitoring. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing (ASHA) convention, San Francisco, CA, 1999
   Google Scholar
• King J., Spoeneman T., Stuart S., Beukelman D. R. Small talk in adult conversations: Implications for AAC vocabulary selection. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 260–264
   Google Scholar
• Lever S. Speaking out: Access to vocabulary. Alternatively Speaking 2003; 6(3)4
   Google Scholar
• Marvin C., Beukelman D., Bilyeu D. Vocabulary-use patterns in preschool children: Effects of context and time sampling. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 1994; 10: 224–236
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D., Bryen D. N. AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 217–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M. M. The dual challenges of aided communication and adolescence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2005; 21: 67–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart S., Beukelman D. R., King J. Vocabulary use during extended conversations by two cohorts of older adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1997; 13: 40–47
   Google Scholar
• Stuart S., Vanderhoof D., Beukelman D. R. Topic and vocabulary use patterns of elderly women. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 95–110
   Google Scholar
• Stump R. T. A vocational rehabilitation counselor and the augmented communicator: From the intake interview to the job interview. Proceedings of the annual Pittsburgh employment conference for augmented communicators, B. Conti, C. Jenkins-Ordorisio. SHOUT Press, Pittsburgh, PA 1993; 16–23
   Google Scholar
• Tönsing K., Alant E. Topics of social conversation in the work place: A South African perspective. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 89–102
   Google Scholar
• van Tatenhoff G. M. It will look good on my resume: Beginning employment for augmented communicators. Proceedings of the Annual Pittsburgh Employment Conference for Augmented Communicators, B. Conti, C. Jenkins-Ordorisio. SHOUT Press, Pittsburgh, PA 1993; 5662
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M., Newman L., Cameto R., Levine P, Garza N. An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 2006, Retrieved 29 February 2008 from: www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_08/nlts2_report_2006_08_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waxman B. F. Hatred: The unacknowledged dimension of violence against disabled people. Sexuality and Disability 1991; 9: 185–199
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Smith K., Beukelman D. Extended communication samples of augmented communicators I: A comparison of individualized versus standard vocabularies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 217–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar