Effects of icon size and location on speed and accuracy of SGD access

References

• Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Johnston, J. (2003). Grammatical morphology acquisition by children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 207–221. doi:10.1080/07434610310001598233.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D., & Hux, K. (2015). Noun representation in AAC grid displays: Visual attention patterns of people with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 15–26. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.995224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukhovny, E., & Gahl, S. (2014). Manual motor-plan similarity affects lexical recall on a speech-generating device: Implications for AAC users. Journal of Communication Disorders, 48, 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall, J. (2014). Jane Farrall Consulting. Retrieved from www.janefarrall.com.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie-Smith, K., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2014). Designing AAC systems for children with autism: Evidence from eye tracking research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 160–171. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.905635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J. (2010). Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 28–39. doi:10.1080/00207590902914051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., Dietz, A., & Weissling, K. (2014). Supporting narrative retells for people with aphasia using Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Photographs or line drawings? Text or no text? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, S213–S224. doi:10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 29–42. doi:10.1080/07434610701390673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99. doi:10.1080/07434610500483588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J., & Baddeley, A. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: Do they have a common source? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1249–1268. doi:10.1080/02724980244000765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadd, E., & Wilkinson, K. (2010). Qualitative analysis of decision making by speech-language pathologists in the design of aided visual displays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 136–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pa, J., Wilson, S. M., Pickell, H., Bellugi, U., & Hickok, G. (2008). Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent: Evidence from signed and spoken language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2198–2210. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. E., Shepherd, T., Renzoni, A. M., Anderson, C., Barber, M., Kingsnorth, S., & Ward, K. (2015). Towards advancing knowledge translation of AAC outcomes research for children and youth with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 137–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1030038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Koul, R., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Brock, K., Harmon, A., … & Hearn, E. (2014). Effects of animation on naming and identification across two graphic symbol sets representing verbs and prepositions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 57, 1779–1791. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Morford, J. P., & Gallagher, T. M. (2004). Production and comprehension of graphic symbol utterances expressing complex propositions by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 349–371. doi:10.1017.S014271640400116X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J., & Wilkinson, K. (2009). The effects of color cues on typically developing preschoolers’ speed of locating a target line drawing: Implications for Augmentative and Alternative Communication display design. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 231–240. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J., & Wilkinson, K. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 235–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815800.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle, J., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Building evidence-based practice in AAC display design for young children: Current practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 124–136. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1035798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Dennis, N. A., Webb, C. E., Therrien, M., Stradtman, M., Farmer, J., … & Zeuner, C. (2015). Neural activity associated with visual search for line drawings on AAC displays: An exploration of the use of fMRI. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 310–324. doi:10.3109.07434618.2015.1100215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., O’Neill, T., & McIlvane, W. J. (2014). Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided AAC displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-age children without disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 57, 455–466. doi:10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Fox, G. (2007). Working memory for language is not special: Evidence for an articulatory loop for novel stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 470–473. doi:10.3758/BF03194091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangari, C. (2013). More on teaching core vocabulary. Retrieved from http://praacticalaac.org/strategy/more-on-teaching-core-vocabulary/.
   Google Scholar