References
- Achmadi, D., Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F., … Marschik, P.B. (2014). Acquisition, preference, and follow-up data on the use of three AAC options by four boys with developmental disability/delay. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 565–583. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9379-z.
- Achmadi, D., van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F., Lang, R., … Marschik, P.B. (2015). Undergraduates’ perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18, 22–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2014.962767.
- Boesch, M., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 480–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.12.002.
- Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
- Couper, L., van der Meer, L., Schaefer, M., McKenzie, E., McLay, L., O’Reilly, M.F., … Sutherland, D. (2014). Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 99–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.870244.
- Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Stroizer, S., Franklin, S., & Hil, D. (2012). A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.644579.
- Hyppa-Martin, J., Collins, D., Chen, M., Amundson, C., Timinski, K., & Mizuko, M. (2016). Comparing first graders’ attitudes and preferences toward a peer using an iPad-based speech-generating device and a non-electronic AAC system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 94–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2016.1146332.
- Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618812331274657.
- Light, J.L. (1997). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619712331277848.
- Lorah, E.R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 637–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9337-1.
- Martin, J.H., Reichle, J., Dimian, A., & Chen, M. (2013). Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 327–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0108).
- McLay, L., Schäfer, M.C.M., van der Meer, L., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M.F., … Sutherland, D. (2016). Acquisition, preference and follow-up comparison across three AAC modes taught to two children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2016.1188892.
- McLay, L., van der Meer, L., Schäfer, M.C.M., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M.F., … Sutherland, D. (2015). Comparing acquisition, generalization, maintenance, and preference across three AAC options in four children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 323–339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9417-x.
- McNaughton, D., & Light, J.C. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.784930.
- Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (Eds.) (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
- Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/aac18.4.137.
- Schlosser, R.W. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 234–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619912331278775.
- Schlosser, R.W., & Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610310001621083.
- Shane, H., Laubscher, E., Schlosser, R., Flynn, S., Sorce, J., & Abramson, J. (2012). Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1228–1235. doi: https://doi.org/0.1007/s10803-011-1304-z.
- Still, K., Rehfeldt, R.A., Whelan, R., May, R., & Symond, S. (2014). Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1184–1199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.003.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Tetlock, P.E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 285–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3033716.
- van der Meer, L. (2015). iPods and iPads as AAC devices for children with developmental disorders. In N. R. Silton (Ed.), Recent advances in assistive technology to support individuals with developmental disorders. (pp. 1–26). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
- van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 451–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9283-3.
- van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.12.002.