The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: a systematic review

References

• *Acheson, M. (2006). The effect of Natural Aided Language Stimulation on requesting desired objects or actions in children with autism spectrum disorder (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cincinnati, Ohio: University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (2005). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Position statement. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/policy/PS2005-00113/#sec1.1
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Garrett, K. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired severe communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 104–121. doi:10.1080/07434618812331274687
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, E. (2016). A systematic review of interventions involving aided AAC modeling for children with complex communication needs. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• *Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323–338. doi:10.1080/07434610802130978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 160–176. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarata, S., & Nelson, K. (2006). Conversational recast intervention with preschool and older children. In R. McCauley & M. Fey (Eds.), Treatment of language disorders in children (pp. 237–264). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 107–112. Retrieved from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001316447303300111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of Aided Language Stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 50–64. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0018)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dexter, M.E. (1998). The effects of Aided Language Stimulation upon verbal output and augmentative communication during storybook reading for children with Pervasive Developmental Disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9832861)
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K.D.R., Light, J.C., Carlson, R., D'silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts. And Menu Approaches. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1133–1148. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/084)
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K.D., Light, J.C., Speltz, J.C., Fallon, K.A., & Jeffries, L.Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/024)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Drager, K.D., Postal, V.J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of Aided Language Modeling on symbol comprehension and production in two preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A., Fein, D., & Naigles, L.R. (2012). Comprehension of Wh‐questions precedes their production in typical development and autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 5, 109–123. doi:10.1002/aur.1220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens’, C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26. doi:10.1080/07434618912331274926
   Google Scholar
• *Harris, M.D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of Aided Language Stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 155–167. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/016)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC). (2017). What is AAC? Retrieved from: https://www.isaac-online.org/english/what-is-aac/
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K.A., Mathur, S.R., Forness, S.R., Quinn, M.M., & Rutherford, R.B. Jr, (2000). Right reason in the integration of group and single-subject research in behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 142–157. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43153734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Buchanan, C. (2015). Teaching children who use augmentative and alternative communication to ask inverted yes/no questions using aided modeling. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 222–236. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 97–107. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kover, S.T., Haebig, E., Oakes, A., McDuffie, A., Hagerman, R.J., & Abbeduto, L. (2014). Sentence comprehension in boys with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 385–394. doi:10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz, P.J., MacDuff, M.T., & McClannahan, L.E. (1993). Programming participation in family activities for children with autism: parents’ use of photographic activity schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 137–138. doi:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *,†Lancioni, G.E. (1983). Using pictorial representations as communication means with low-functioning children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 87–105. doi:10.1007/BF01531362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Let’s go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171. doi: 10.1080/07434619712331277978
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellott, S., Millar, D., Parrish, C., … Welliver, M. (2004). Performance of typically developing four-and five-year-old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 63–88. doi:10.1080/07434610410001655553
   Google Scholar
• Ma, H.H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30, 598–617. doi: 10.1177/0145445504272974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson Co. (1994). Picture communication symbols combination book. Solano Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K.E., Camarata, S.M., Welsh, J., Butkovsky, L., & Camarata, M. (1996). Effects of imitative and conversational recasting treatment on the acquisition of grammar in children with specific language impairment and younger language-normal children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 850–859. doi:10.1044/jshr.3904.850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, A., Schlosser, R.W., Shane, H.C., Abramson, J., Allen, A.A., Yu, C., & Dimery, K. (2016). Just-in-time visual supports for children with autism via the Apple Watch: A pilot feasibility study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 3818–3823. doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2891-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. (2007). Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 194–204. Retrieved from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00224669070400040101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., & Davis, J.L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichow, B. (2010). Development, procedures, and application of the evaluative method for determining evidence-based practices in autism. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-Based Practices and Treatments for Children with Autism (pp. 25–39). Boston (MA): Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., & Sevcik, R. (1988a). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 83–93. doi:10.1080/07434618812331274667
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., & Sevcik, R.A. (1988b). Augmentative communication system acquisition and use: A model for teaching and assessing progress. NSSLHA Journal, 16, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 281–285. doi:10.1080/07434619312331276701
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Adamson, L.B., Cheslock, M., & Smith, A. (2007). Parents can implement AAC interventions: Ratings of treatment implementation across early language interventions. Early Childhood Services, 1, 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• *Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Adamson, L.B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R.M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350–364. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Robinson, B., & Bakeman, R. (1994). Adult-directed communications of youth with mental retardation using the System for Augmenting Language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 617–628. doi:10.1044/jshr.3703.617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *,†Rosa-Lugo, L.I., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2008). Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 49–61. doi:10.1177/1525740108320353
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2006). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• *,†Schlosser, R.W., Belfiore, P.J., Nigam, R., Blischak, D., & Hetzroni, O. (1995). The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 537–549. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., Laubscher, E., Sorce, J., Koul, R., Flynn, S., Hotz, L., & Shane, H. (2013). Implementing directives that involve prepositions with children with autism: A comparison of spoken cues with two types of augmented input. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 132–145. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., Lee, D., & Wendt, O. (2008). Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 163–187. doi:10.1080/17489530802505412
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R.W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138–150. doi:10.1080/17489530701560831
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33. doi: 10.1177/074193258700800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Cook, S.B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260–271. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23882207.
   Google Scholar
• Sennott, S.C., Light, J.C., & McNaughton, D. (2016). AAC modeling intervention research review. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41, 101–115. doi:10.1177/1540796916638822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R.A. (2006). Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 159–167. doi:10.1080/09638280500077804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Grove, N. (1996). Input/output asymmetries: Implications for language development in AAC. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• *,†Solomon-Rice, P.L., & Soto, G. (2014). Facilitating vocabulary in toddlers using AAC: A preliminary study comparing focused stimulation and augmented input. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 35, 204–215. doi:10.1177/1525740114522856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swensen, L.D., Kelley, E., Fein, D., & Naigles, L.R. (2007). Processes of language acquisition in children with autism: Evidence from preferential looking. Child Development, 78, 542–557. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01022.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *,†Taylor, R., & Iacono, T. (2009). AAC and scripting activities to facilitate communication and play. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 5, 79–93. doi:10.1080/14417040510001669111
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., & Morford, J.P. (2014). An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 187–199. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single‐case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. doi:10.1002/jcad.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1992). Introduction to symbolic and augmentative communication. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, O. (2015). Current issues in research synthesis and meta-analysis of single-case experiments on autism treatment. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI), San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• *,†Wolff Heller, K., Alberto, P.A., & Romski, M.A. (1995). Effect of object and movement cues on receptive communication by preschool children with mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 99, 510–521. Retrieved from: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1995-29743-001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood, L., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D., & Ball, L. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 261–267. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278436
   Google Scholar