406
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Towards interdisciplinarity with STEAM educational strategies: the Internet of Things as a catalyser to promote participatory citizenship

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Al-Emran, M., Malik, S. I., & Al-Kabi, M. N. (2020). A survey of Internet of Things (IoT) in education: Opportunities and challenges. Toward Social Internet of Things (SioT): Enabling Technologies, Architectures and Applications, 846, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24513-9_12
  • Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
  • Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 51(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2
  • Boon Ng, S. (2019). Exploring STEM competences for the 21st century. UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. Retrieved March 02, 2024, from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/8216490/exploring-stem-competences-for-the-21st-century/9129420/
  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  • Burkard, S. and Fuchs-Kittowski, F. (2023). Design and development of a Mobile outdoor AR application for on-site visualization of wind turbines. In Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, London (pp. 311–322).
  • Chweya, R., & Ibrahim, O. (2021). Internet of Things (IoT) implementation in learning institutions: A systematic literature review. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.29.1.26
  • Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
  • Daneshpour, H. and Kwegyir-Afful, E. (2021). Analysing transdisciplinary education: A scoping review. Science & Education, 31(4), 1047–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00277-0
  • de Cote, E. P. M. L. M., Flores Herrera, A. M., Giorgi, E., & Cattaneo, T. (2022). Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) as Tools to Empower Vulnerable Communities: Opportunities and Challenges for Designers. In E. Giorgi, T. Cattaneo, A. Flores Herrera, & V. Tarango (Eds.), Design for Vulnerable Communities (pp. 307–321). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96866-3_16
  • de Sousa Santos, M. J., Carlos, V., & Moreira, A. A. (2022). Student and Teacher perceptions of citizenship strategies supported by the internet of things: Participatory citizenship Co-constructed guidelines. In M. J. Loureiro, A. Loureiro, & H. R. Gerber (Eds.), Handbook of research on global education and the impact of institutional policies on educational technologies (pp. 75–99). IGI Global.
  • Dillman, D. A. (2020). Three Decades of Advancing Survey Methodology. In T. W. Smith (Ed.), A Meeting Place and More…: A History of the American Association for Public Opinion Research (pp. 95–117). AAPOR.
  • El Mrabet, H., & Ait Moussa, A. (2021). IoT-school guidance: A holistic approach to vocational self-awareness & career path. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5439–5456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10548-6
  • El Mrabet, H., & Ait Moussa, A. (2022). A framework for predicting academic orientation using supervised machine learning. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(12), 16539–16549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03909-7
  • E. National Academies of Sciences and Medicine. (2018). Envisioning the data science discipline: The undergraduate perspective: Interim report. National Academies Press.
  • Erazo-Garzón, L., Cedillo, P., Rossi, G., & Moyano, J. (2022). A domain-specific language for modeling IoT system architectures that support monitoring. IEEE Access, 10, 61639–61665. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3181166
  • Gökçearslan, Ş., Yildiz Durak, H., & Atman Uslu, N. (2022). Acceptance of educational use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the context of individual innovativeness and ICT competency of pre-service teachers. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2091612
  • Guerra-Londono, M., Urrea, G., Botero-Valencia, J., and Reyes-Vera, E. (2022). Design, implementation, and modeling of a LoRa Network Installed in a freshwater body. In International Conference on Smart Technologies, Systems and Applications (pp. 17–29).
  • Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., & Vogel, J. (2018). Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society and policy. UCL Press.
  • Hom, E. J. (2014). What is STEM education? Live science. Live Science Recuperate. https//www.livescience.com/43296-what-is-stem-education.html
  • Kassab, M., DeFranco, J., & Laplante, P. (2020). A systematic literature review on internet of things in education: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12383
  • Kloos, C. D., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Ibanez, M. B., and Crespo-García, R. M. (2018). The hybridization factor of technology in education. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain (pp. 1883–1889).
  • Lehrer, R. (2019). Design research in education. A practical guide for early career researchers. Taylor & Francis.
  • Loureiro, M. J., Loureiro, A., & Gerber, H. R. (2022). Handbook of research on global education and the impact of institutional policies on educational technologies. IGI GLOBAL.
  • Machorro-Cano, I., Paredes-Valverde, M. A., Alor-Hernandez, G., Del Pilar Salas-Zárate, M., Segura-Ozuna, M. G., and Sánchez-Cervantes, J. L. (2019). Pesshiot: Smart platform for monitoring and controlling smart home devices and sensors. In International Conference on Technologies and Innovation, Guayaquil, Ecuador (pp. 137–150).
  • Marquez, J., Villanueva, J., Solarte, Z., & Garcia, A. (2016). IoT in education: Integration of objects with virtual academic communities. In Á. Rocha, A. Maria Correia, H. Adeli, L. Paulo Reis, & M. Mendonça Teixeira (Eds.), New advances in information systems and technologies (pp. 201–212). Springer.
  • Masmali, F., Miah, S. J., Noman, N. (2023). Different applications and technologies of internet of things (IoT). In X-S. Yang, S. Sherratt, N. Dey, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, Singapore, (Vol. 464). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2394-4_5
  • McKenney, S., Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (2006). Design research from a curriculum perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 79–102). Routledge.
  • McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2021). Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Medical Education, 55(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14280
  • Möller, F., Guggenberger, T. M., and Otto, B. (2020). Towards a method for design principle development in information systems. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Kristiansand, Norway (pp. 208–220).
  • Moreira, F. T., Magalhaes, A., Ramos, F., and Vairinhos, M. (2017). The power of the internet of things in education: An overview of current status and potential. In Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development, Aveiro, Portugal (pp. 51–63).
  • Moreira, F. T., Vairinhos, M., and Ramos, F. (2020). Open IoT technologies in the classroom—A case study on the student’s perception. In 2020 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–6).
  • Ramli, S. S., Maaruf, S. Z., Mohamad, S. N. A., Abdullah, N., Shamsudin, N. M., & Aris, S. R. S. (2022). STEAM-ing: Preliminary insights in consolidating arts with STEM. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i1.17182
  • Reeves, T. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 64–78). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
  • Sai, G. H., Tripathi, K., and Tyagi, A. K. (2023). Internet of things-based e-health care: Key challenges and recommended solutions for future. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security, Ghaziabad, India (pp. 461–474).
  • Strohmann, T., Siemon, D., Khosrawi-Rad, B., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2022). Toward a design theory for virtual companionship. Human–Computer Interaction, 38(3–4), 194–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2022.2084620
  • Suduc, A.-M., Bîzoi, M., & Gorghiu, G. (2018). A survey on IoT in education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/66
  • Tun, S. Y. Y., Madanian, S., & Mirza, F. (2021). Internet of things (IoT) applications for elderly care: A reflective review. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(4), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01545-9
  • Ulloa, M., Prado-Cabrera, D., & Cedillo, P. (2021). Systematic literature review of internet of things solutions oriented to people with physical and intellectual disabilities. ICT4AWE, 228–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0010480902280235
  • van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Springer.
  • Wu, C.-H., Liu, C.-H., & Huang, Y.-M. (2022). The exploration of continuous learning intention in STEAM education through attitude, motivation, and cognitive load. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00346-y