2,276
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

A scientometric review of research trends in computer-assisted language learning (1977 – 2020)

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aitsiselmi, F. (1999). Second language acquisition through email interaction. ReCALL, 11(2), 4–11. doi:10.1017/S0958344000004900
  • Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202–232.
  • Appel, M. C. (1999). Tandem language learning by e-mail: Some basic principles and a case study. CLCS Occasional Paper, 54, 1–64.
  • Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. doi:10.1002/asi.21062
  • Arslan, R. Ş., & Şahin-Kızıl, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183–197. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.486575
  • Aryadoust, V. (2020). A review of comprehension subskills: A Scientometrics perspective. System, 88, 102180. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.102180
  • Aryadoust, V., Zakaria, A., Lim, M. H., & Chen, C. (2020). An extensive knowledge mapping review of measurement and validity in language assessment and SLA research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1941. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01941
  • Basanta, C. P. (2004). Pedagogic aspects of the design and content of an online course for the development of lexical competence: ADELEX. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 16(1), 20. doi:10.1017/S095834400400031X
  • Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60–81. doi:10125/25143.
  • Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–117. doi:10125/25201
  • Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 111–125. doi:10125/25089
  • Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2), 377–395. doi:10.1017/S0958344004000928
  • Boch, J. (2007). Abdullah’s blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 128–141. doi:10125/44107
  • Börner, K. (2007). Making sense of mankind’s scholarly knowledge and expertise: Collecting, interlinking, and organizing what we know and different approaches to mapping (network) science. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(5), 808–825. doi:10.1068/b3302t
  • Brzezinski, M. (2015). Power laws in citation distributions: Evidence from Scopus. Scientometrics, 103(1), 213–228. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1524-z
  • Bush, M. D. (2013). Computer-assisted language learning: From vision to reality? CALICO Journal, 25(3), 443–470. doi:10.1558/cj.v25i3.443-470
  • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chávez, R. (1990). The development of story writing within an IBM writing to read program lab among language minority students: Preliminary findings. Computers in the Schools, 7(1-2), 121–144. doi:10.1300/J025v07n01_06
  • Chen, C. (2014). The CiteSpace manual. College of Computing and Informatics. Drexel University.
  • Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2, 1–40.
  • Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.
  • Chen, C., Chen, Y., Horowitz, M., Hou, H., Liu, Z., & Pellegrino, D. (2009). Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 191–209. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.004
  • Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608. doi:10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
  • Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple‐perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409. doi:10.1002/asi.21309
  • Chiu, Y. H. (2013). Computer‐assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), E52–E56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01342.x
  • Chiu, Y. H., Kao, C. W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2012). The relative effectiveness of digital game‐based learning types in English as a foreign language setting: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), E104–E107. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01295.x
  • Chu, S. K., Chan, C. K., & Tiwari, A. F. (2012). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers & Education, 58(3), 989–1000. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.027
  • Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x
  • Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: An exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(3), 218–232. doi:10.1017/S0958344011000152
  • Deutschmann, M., Panichi, L., & Molka-Danielsen, J. (2009). Designing oral participation in second life – A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2), 206–226. doi:10.1017/S0958344009000196
  • Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216. doi:10.1017/S0958344014000287
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Farmer, B., Yue, A., & Brooks, C. (2008). Using blogging for higher order learning in large cohort university teaching: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 123–136. doi:10.14742/ajet.1215
  • Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research – Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1-2), 1–32. doi:10.1080/​09588220500132274
  • Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 409–442. doi:10.1080/09588220701746013
  • Freeman, W., & Brett, C. (2012). Prompting authentic blogging practice in an online graduate course. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1032–1041. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.019
  • Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201. doi:10.1002/asi.5090140304
  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367. doi:10.1023/A:1022378804087
  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  • Grgurović, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25(2), 165–198. doi:10.1017/S0958344013000013
  • Gündüz, N. (2005). Computer assisted language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 193–214.
  • Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66−82. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/10125-25230/
  • Hasan, M. (2013). Podcast applications in language learning: A review of recent studies. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 128–135. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n2p128
  • Hémard, D. (2004). Enhancing online CALL design: The case for evaluation. ReCALL, 16(2), 502–519. doi:10.1017/S0958344004001727
  • Hirotani, M. (2013). Synchronous versus asynchronous CMC and transfer to Japanese oral performance. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 413–438. doi:10.1558/cj.v26i2.413-438
  • Holsapple, C. W. (2008). The pulse of multiparticipant systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 333–343. doi:10.1080/10919390802453617
  • Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. doi:10.1023/A:1017919924342
  • Hou, J., Yang, X., & Chen, C. (2018). Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics, 115(2), 869–892. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9
  • Hung, J. L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/s12528-011-9044-9
  • Jauregi, K., Canto, S., De Graaff, R., Koenraad, T., & Moonen, M. (2011). Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 77–101. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.538699
  • Jones, M. (1997). It all depends what you mean by discipline….
  • Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 441–453. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb01127.x
  • Kenning, M. M. (2010). Differences that make the difference: A study of functionalities in synchronous CMC. ReCALL, 22(1), 3–19. doi:10.1017/S0958344009990164
  • Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457–476. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
  • Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. doi:10.1080/09588220903467335
  • Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166. doi:10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143
  • Kötter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145–172. doi:10125/25203.
  • Kovalev, F., & Kugler, V. (n.d.). Conceptual and structural scientific articles retrieving. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Authors’ Instructions. Kovalev_Kugler_Conceptual_and_structural_scientific_articles_retrieving.pdf (d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net)
  • Kramsch, C., & Andersen, R. W. (1999). Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 31–42.
  • Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
  • Lee, L. (2010). Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course. ReCALL, 22(2), 212–227. doi:10.1017/S095834401000008X
  • Lei, L., & Liao, S. (2017). Publications in linguistics journals from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau (2003–2012). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(1), 54–64. doi:10.1080/09296174.2016.1260274
  • Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540–561. doi:10.1093/applin/amy003
  • Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
  • Liesch, P. W., Håkanson, L., McGaughey, S. L., Middleton, S., & Cretchley, J. (2011). The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics, 88(1), 17–42. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0372-3
  • Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273. doi:10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348
  • Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47–56. doi:10.1080/09737766.2008.10700853
  • Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606–623. doi:10.1086/354848
  • Nikolova, O. R. (2002). Effects of students’ participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100–122. doi:10125/25145
  • O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the “other side”: Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118–144.
  • Oskoz, A. (2009). Learners’ feedback in online chats: What does it reveal about students’ learning? Calico Journal, 27(1), 48–68. doi:10.11139/cj.27.1.48-68
  • Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peterson, M. (2006). Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 79–103. doi:10.1080/09588220600804087
  • Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?. Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
  • Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3–23. doi:10.1108/13673271011015534
  • Shamsudin, S., & Nesi, H. (2006). Computer-mediated communication in English for specific purposes: A case study with computer science students at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(4-5), 317–339. doi:10.1080/09588220601043164
  • Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 467–482. doi:10.2307/25148852
  • Small, H. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183–196. doi:10.1108/eb026695
  • Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38–57. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00177
  • Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 26(3), 365−398. doi:10.1017/S0272263104043013
  • Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 82–119. Retrieved February 13, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
  • Steel, C. H., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006-2011. ReCALL, 25(3), 306–320. doi:10.1017/S0958344013000128
  • Tai, S. J. D. (2015). From TPACK-in-action workshops to classrooms: CALL competency developed and integrated. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 139–164.
  • Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67. doi:10125/25200
  • Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online gaming. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 802–821. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00974.x
  • Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217–228. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x
  • Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141–159. doi:10125/25218
  • Vinther, J. (2011). Enhancing motivation with cultural narratives in computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 337–352. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.572898
  • Voß, S., & Zhao, X. (2005, February). Some steps towards a scientometric analysis of publications in machine translation. Proceedings of the 23rd IASTED international multi-conference artificial intelligence and applications (pp. 651–655). Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x
  • Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Yang, J. (2013). Mobile assisted language learning: Review of the recent applications of emerging mobile technologies. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 19–25. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n7p19
  • Yang, S., Yuan, Q., & Dong, J. (2020). Are scientometrics, informetrics, and bibliometrics different? Data Science and Informetrics, 1(01), 50. doi:10.4236/dsi.2020.11003
  • Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2010). The effects of task type in synchronous computer-mediated communication. ReCALL, 22(1), 20–38. doi:10.1017/S0958344009990176
  • Zhang, Z., & Poucke, S. V. (2017). Citations for randomized controlled trials in sepsis literature: The halo effect caused by journal impact factor. PLoS One, 12(1), e0169398. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169398

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.