Creating an inclusive leisure space: strategies used to engage children with and without disabilities in the arts-mediated program Spiral Garden

References

• Jeanes R, Magee J. ‘Can we play on the swings and roundabouts?’: creating inclusive play spaces for disabled young people and their families. Leis Stud. 2012;31:193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine MA, Parr MG. “Come on in, but not too far:” Social capital in an inclusive leisure setting. Leis Sci. 2008;30:391–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Bart O, Ratzon NZ, et al. Personal and environmental factors predict participation of children with and without mild developmental disabilities. J Child Fam Stud. 2013;22:658–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simplican SC, Leader G, Kosciulek J, et al. Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an ecological model of social networks and community participation. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;38:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilson ST, Traustadóttir R. Theoretical perspectives and childhood participation. SJDR. 2009;11:51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Odom SL, Buysse V, Soukakou E. Inclusion for young children with disabilities a quarter century of research perspectives. J Early Interv. 2011;33:344–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster M, Nakken H, Pijl SJ, et al. Being part of the peer group: a literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. Int J Incl Educ. 2009;13:117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. ‘Participation’: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford SK, Stafford KN, Phillips SM, et al. Strategies for inclusion in play among children with physical disabilities in childcare centers: an integrative review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34:404–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay S, McPherson AC. Strategies for improving disability awareness and social inclusion of children and young people with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:809–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips BN, Deiches J, Morrison B, et al. Social effectiveness a 30-year review of the rehabilitation counseling literature. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2015;60:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker E, Dusing S. Participation is possible: a case report of integration into a community performing arts program. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:275–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devine MA. “Being a ‘doer’ instead of a ‘viewer’”: the role of inclusive leisure contexts in determining social acceptance for people with disabilities. J Leis Res. 2004;36:137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine MA, O’Brien MB. The mixed bag of inclusion: an examination of an inclusive camp using contact theory. Ther Recreation J. 2007;41:201.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd CM, Fraiman JL, Hawkins KA, et al. Effects of the STAR intervention program on interactions between campers with and without disabilities during inclusive summer day camp activities. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2008;43:92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Rigby P, Batorowicz B. Conceptualizing participation in context for children and youth with disabilities: an activity setting perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1578–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison P, Mecke T, Sharpe E. Partners in inclusion at a residential summer camp: a case study. Ther Recreation J. 2008;42:181.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte J, Hart T. It’s more than a black box; it’s a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:639–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, McPherson A, Kingsnorth S, et al. Residential immersive life skills programs for youth with disabilities: service providers’ perceptions of experiential benefits and key program features. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:971–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald M, Scott S, Hartling L. Mapping the waters: a scoping review of the use of visual arts in pediatric populations with health conditions. Arts Health. 2014;6:5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broderick S. Arts practices in unreasonable doubt? Reflections on understandings of arts practices in healthcare contexts. Arts Health. 2011;3:95–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King G, Kingsnorth S, Sheffe S, et al. An inclusive arts-mediated program for children with and without disabilities: establishing community and an environment for child development through the arts. Child Health Care. 2016;45:229–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKie J, Petryk B. Introduction. In: MacKie J, Petryk B, editors. Spiral Garden resource book. 2nd ed. Toronto: Bloorview Kids Rehab and Spiral Community Artists’ Circle; 2009. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Davis H. Distance in proximity: Spiral Garden, community-based art, and friendship. Third Text. 2015;29:47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine MA, Lashua B. Constructing social acceptance in inclusive leisure contexts: the role of individuals with disabilities. Ther Recreation J. 2002;36:65.
   Google Scholar
• Barron K. Social inclusion as a theoretical concept and a social practice. In: Traustadóttir R, Ytterhus B, Thóra Egilson S, Berg B, editors. Childhood and disability in the Nordic countries: being, becoming, belonging. New York: Palgrave MacMillan; 2015. p. 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Haverkamp BE, Young RA. Paradigms, purpose, and the role of the literature formulating a rationale for qualitative investigations. Counsel Psychol. 2007;35:265–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Focus on research methods: whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fylan F. Semi-structured interviewing. In: Miles J, Gilbert P, editors. A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand; 2005. p. 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985. p. 1–416.
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE, Trumbull DJ. Naturalistic generalizations. Rev J Philos Soc Sci. 1982;7:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cross AF, Traub EK, Hutter-Pishgahi L, et al. Elements of successful inclusion for children with significant disabilities. Topics Early Childhood Spec Educ. 2004;24:169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaby D, Law M, Teplicky R, et al. Focusing on the environment to improve youth participation: experiences and perspectives of occupational therapists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:13388–13398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falardeau M, Durand MJ. Negotiation-centred versus client-centred: which approach should be used? Can J Occup Ther. 2002;69:135–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinsella EA. Reflections on reflective practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2001;68:195–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bright FA, Boland P, Rutherford SJ, et al. Implementing a client-centred approach in rehabilitation: an autoethnography. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What is HIGH FIVE®: Mission, vision and principles [Internet]. Parks and Recreation Ontario [cited 2016 Mar 14]. Available from: http://highfive.org/what-high-five/mission-vision-and-principles.
   Google Scholar
• King G. A relational goal-oriented model of optimal service delivery to children and families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29:384–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz B, King G, Mishra L, et al. An integrated model of social environment and social context for pediatric rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1204–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameroff A. A unified theory of development: a dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Dev. 2010;81:6–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews SH. A window on the ‘new’ sociology of childhood. Sociol Compass. 2007;1:322–334.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE. Parallels and problems of normalization in rehabilitation and universal design: enabling connectivities. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1328–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Carnevale FA, King G. ‘This is my way’: reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1894–1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin DL, Lieberman LJ, Johnston K, et al. Connecting through summer camp: youth with visual impairments find a sense of community. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2011;28:40–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar