361
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives on Rehabilitation

A guiding process to culturally adapt assessments for participation-focused pediatric practice: the case of the Participation and Environment Measures (PEM)

, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 6497-6509 | Received 22 Oct 2020, Accepted 20 Jul 2021, Published online: 19 Aug 2021

References

  • Arakelyan S, Maciver D, Rush R, et al. Family factors associated with participation of children with disabilities: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(5):514–522.
  • Brochard S, Newman CJ. The need for innovation in participation in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(5):501.
  • Coster W, Khetani M. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(8):639–648.
  • Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, et al. Development of the participation and environment measure for children and youth: conceptual basis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):238–246.
  • Rosenfeld L. Participation of children with disabilities across the life course: using socio-ecological perspectives to guide research and practice. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(4):406.
  • Anaby D, Avery L, Gorter JW, et al. Improving body functions through participation in community activities among young people with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(5):640–646.
  • Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(6):640–649.
  • Murphy NA and Carbone PS.; American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children with Disabilities. Promoting the participation of children with disabilities in sports, recreation, and physical activities. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2008;121(5):1057–1061.
  • Steinhardt F, Ullenhag A, Jahnsen R, et al. Perceived facilitators and barriers for participation in leisure activities in children with disabilities: perspectives of children, parents and professionals. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(2):121–135.
  • Taheri A, Perry A, Minnes P. Examining the social participation of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorder in relation to peers. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016;60(5):435–443.
  • Willis CE, Reid S, Elliott C, et al. 'It's important that we learn too': Empowering parents to facilitate participation in physical activity for children and youth with disabilities. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;26(2):135–148.
  • Arakelyan S, Maciver D, Rush R, et al. Community-based participation of children with and without disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(4):445–453.
  • Heah T, Case T, McGuire B, et al. Successful participation: the lived experience among children with disabilities. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74(1):38–47.
  • International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001 [cited 2021 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf.
  • Masala C, Petretto D. From disablement to enablement: conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1233–1244.
  • Forsyth R, Jarvis S. Participation in childhood. Child Care Health Dev. 2002;28(4):277–279.
  • Mitra S, Shakespeare T. Remodeling the ICF. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(3):337–339.
  • Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. 'Participation': a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(1):29–38.
  • Khetani MA, Cohn ES, Orsmond GI, et al. Parent perspectives of participation in home and community activities when receiving part C early intervention services. Top Early Child Spec Educ [Internet]. 2013;32(4):234–245.
  • Anaby D, Hand C, Bradley L, et al. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(19):1589–1598.
  • Colver A, Thyen U, Arnaud C, et al. Association between participation in life situations of children with cerebral palsy and their physical, social, and attitudinal environment: a cross-sectional multicenter european study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(12):2154–2164.
  • Darrah J, Law MC, Pollock N, et al. Context therapy: a new intervention approach for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(7):615–620.
  • Anaby DR, Law M, Feldman D, et al. The effectiveness of the pathways and resources for engagement and participation (PREP) intervention: improving participation of adolescents with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(5):513–519.
  • United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  • United Nations. Convention on the rights of the child [Internet]. 1989 [cited 2021 Apr 9]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx.
  • Gordon JS. Is inclusive education a human right? J Law Med Ethics. 2013;41(4):754–767.
  • Gordon JS, Tavera-Salyutov F. Remarks on disability rights legislation. EDI. 2018;37(5):506–526.
  • Schlebusch L, Huus K, Samuels A, et al. Participation of young people with disabilities and/or chronic conditions in low- and Middle-income countries: a scoping review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(11):1259–1265.
  • Chang FH, Liu CH, Hung HP. An in-depth understanding of the impact of the environment on participation among people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(18):2192–2199.
  • Adair B, Ullenhag A, Rosenbaum P, et al. Measures used to quantify participation in childhood disability and their alignment with the family of participation-related constructs: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(11):1101–1116.
  • Resch C, Van Kruijsbergen M, Ketelaar M, et al. Assessing participation of children with acquired brain injury and cerebral palsy: a systematic review of measurement properties. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(4):434–444.
  • Phillips RL, Olds T, Boshoff K, et al. Measuring activity and participation in children and adolescents with disabilities: a literature review of available instruments. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(4):288–300.
  • Khetani MA, Graham JE, Davies PL, et al. Psychometric properties of the young children’s participation and environment measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(2):307–316.
  • Coster W, Bedell G, Law M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(11):1030–1037.
  • Bedell G, Khetani M, Cousins M, et al. Parent perspectives to inform development of measures of children’s participation and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(5):765–773.
  • Shahin S, Anaby D. The development and content validity of the self-reported Youth and Young-adult Participation and Environment Measure. 33rd Annual Meeting of the European Academy of Childhood Disability (EACD); 2021 May 16.
  • McConachie H, Colver AF, Forsyth R, et al. Participation of disabled children: how should it be characterised and measured? Disabil rehabil. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1157–1164. [Internet].
  • King G. Perspectives on measuring participation: going forward. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(4):466–469.
  • Koller D, Pouesard M, Rummens J. Defining social inclusion for children with disabilities: a critical literature review [Internet]. Child Soc. 2018;32(1):1–13.
  • Li X, Lam CB, Chung KKH, et al. Linking parents’ self-stigma to the adjustment of children with disabilities. Am J Orthopsychiatry [Internet]. 2019;89(2):212–221.
  • Harkness S, Zylicz PO, Super CM, et al. Children’s activities and their meanings for parents: a mixed-methods study in six Western cultures. J Fam Psychol. 2011;25(6):799–813.
  • Munyi C. Past and present perceptions towards disability: a historical perspective. DSQ. 2012;32(2).
  • Ullenhag A, Bult M, Nyquist A, et al. An international comparison of patterns of participation in leisure activities for children with and without disabilities in Sweden, Norway and The Netherlands. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(5):369–385.
  • Fauconnier J, Dickinson H, Beckung E, et al. Participation in life situations of 8-12 year old children with cerebral palsy: cross sectional european study. Br Med J. 2009;338(7703):1116–1121.
  • World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva (CH): WHO Press; 2011.
  • Gilbert R. Raising awareness of class privilege among students. Divers Democr. 2008;11(3):7–9.
  • Stevelink S, Van Brakel W. The cross-cultural equivalence of participation instruments: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(15):1256–1268.
  • Arestad KE, MacPhee D, Lim CY, et al. Cultural adaptation of a pediatric functional assessment for rehabilitation outcomes research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):658.
  • Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaption of self-report measures. Spine [Internet]. 2001;25(4):3186–3191.
  • COSMIN [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 May 10]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/tools/cosmin-taxonomy-measurement-properties/.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2010;63(7):737–745.
  • Jeong Y, Law M, Stratford P, et al. Measuring participation of children and environmental factors at home, school, and in community: construct validation of the korean PEM-CY. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr [Internet]. 2017;37(5):1–13.
  • Egilson ST, Jakobsdóttir G, Ólafsdóttir LB. Parent perspectives on home participation of high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorder compared with a matched group of children without autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2018;22(5):560–570.
  • Galvão É, Cazeiro APM, Campos ACD, et al. Participation and environment measure for children and youth (PEM-CY): cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil. J of Occup Ther of Univ of São Paulo/Revista de Terapia Ocupacional da Universidade de São Paulo [Internet]. 2018;29(3). Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Participation-and-Environment-Measure-for-Children-Galv%C3%A3o-Cazeiro/711a20d8bb3953ef79321c379d4bfaf4feb80fda
  • Chien CW, Leung C, Schoeb V, et al. A chinese version of the young children’s participation and environment measure: psychometric evaluation in a Hong Kong sample. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2020;1–9. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2020.1727032.
  • Lim CY, Law M, Khetani M, et al. Establishing the cultural equivalence of the young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) for Use in Singapore. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36(4):422–439.
  • Åström F, Khetani M, Axelsson AK. Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure: Swedish Cultural Adaptation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(3):329–342.
  • Egilson ST, Jakobsdóttir G, Ólafsson K, et al. Community participation and environment of children with and without autism spectrum disorder: parent perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(3):187–196.
  • Bakaniene I, Prasauskiene A. Patterns and predictors of participation in children and adolescents with spina bifida. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(26):3771–3779.
  • Guichard S, Grande C. The role of environment in explaining frequency of participation of pre-school children in home and community activities. Int J Dev Disabil. 2017;65(2):108–115.
  • Bakanienė I, Prasauskienė A. Clinical and environmental predictors of health-related quality of life in lithuanian children and adolescents with spina bifida: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally represented sample. Medicina [Internet]. 2018;54(4):59.
  • Milićević M, Nedović G. Comparative study of home and community participation among children with and without cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil [Internet]. 2018;80:74–83.
  • Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int [Internet]. 2000;15(3):259–267.
  • Barnekow K, Patrick T, Rhyner P, et al. Readability of early intervention program literature. Top Early Child Spec Educ [Internet]. 2011;31(1):58–64.
  • Irwin DE, Varni JW, Yeatts K, et al. Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7(1):3–10.
  • Knafl K, Deatrick J, Gallo A, et al. The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(2):224–234.
  • Charters E. The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Educ J [Internet]. 2003;12(2):68–82.
  • Eccles DW, Arsal G. The think aloud method: what is it and how do I use it? Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal [Internet]. 2017;9(4):514–531.
  • Paul-Dauphin A, Guillemin F, Virion JM, et al. Bias and precision in visual analogue scales: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(10):1117–1127.
  • Peterson CH, Peterson NA, Powell KG. Cognitive interviewing for item development: validity evidence based on content and response processes. Meas Eval Couns Dev [Internet]. 2017;50(4):217–223.
  • Srinivasan R, Kulkarni V, Smriti S, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth to the indian context-a mixed-methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021;18(4):1514.
  • Lim CY, Law M, Khetani M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) for use in Singapore. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(3):316–328.
  • Willis G. Cognitive interviewing: a “how to” guide. Research Triangle Institute [Internet]. 1999. Available from: https://www.hkr.se/contentassets/9ed7b1b3997e4bf4baa8d4eceed5cd87/gordonwillis.pdf.
  • Van der Zee C, Priesterbach A, Dussen L, et al. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: the ICF measure of participation and activities screener, the participation scale, and the Utrecht scale for evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(8):752–757.
  • Fallahpour M, Jonsson H, Joghataei MT, et al. Impact on participation and autonomy (IPA): psychometric evaluation of the persian version to use for persons with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18(1):59–71.
  • Meppelink CS, Smit EG, Diviani N, et al. Health literacy and online health information processing: unraveling the underlying mechanisms. J Health Commun. 2016;21(Sup 2):109–120.
  • Albrecht EC, Kaelin VC, Rigau BL, et al. High value early intervention research group. Pilot implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure for planning and monitoring participation-focused care in early intervention. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak [Internet]. 2020;20:199.
  • Krieger B, Schulze C, Boyd J, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the participation and environment measure for children and youth (PEM-CY) into german: a qualitative study in three countries. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):492.
  • Sbaffi L, Rowley J. Trust and credibility in web-based health information: a review and agenda for future research. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e218.
  • Information is beautiful: colours in culture [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 14]. Available from: https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/colours-in-cultures/.
  • Terwee CB, Prinsen C, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs: user manual (version 1.0). Amsterdam: VU University Medical Center [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf.
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2010 national healthcare disparities report. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [Internet]; 2010. Available from: http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhdr10/index.html.
  • Richardson Z, Khetani M, Scully E, et al. Social and functional characteristics of receipt and service use intensity of core early intervention services. Acad Pediatr [Internet]. 2019;19(7):722–732.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.