Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Children Who Use AAC in Italian Primary Schools

References

• Alant, E., & Emmett, A. (1995). Breaking the silence: Communication and education for children with severe handicaps. Pretoria, SA: HSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Antonak, R., & Livneh, H. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(5), 211–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000a). A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 191–211.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000b). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(3), 277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., Angell, M. E., & Stoner, J. B. (2011). Improving literacy skills in students with complex communication needs who use augmentative/alternative communication systems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(3), 352–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., & Iacono, T. (1998). A few well-chosen words. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(3).
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., Akaba, S., Brady, N. C., & Thiemann-Bourque, K. (2013). Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(4), 334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (Fourth ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cafiero, J. M. (2001). The effect of an augmentative communication intervention on the communication, behavior, and academic program of an adolescent with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 179–189.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M., & Maxwell, K. (1998). Promoting interaction with children using augmentative communication through a peer‐directed intervention. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 45(1), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. C., & Carter, E. W. (2013). Promoting peer interactions in inclusive classrooms for students who use speech-generating devices. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(2), 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corston, R., & Colman, A. (2000). A crash course in SPSS for Windows. Blackwell, Oxford: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C., & Marvin, C. A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(4), 254–272.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. M. (2003). “If mama ain’t happy, ain’t nobody happy”: Collaborating with families in AAC interventions with infants and toddlers. SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cumley, G., & Beukelman, D. R. (1992). Roles and responsibilities of facilitators in augmentative and alternative communication. Seminars in Speech and Language, 13, 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S. (1999). Teachers’ attitudes towards children with LNFS using two AAC devices ( Doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2002). A comparative study of the attitudes of teachers at special and educationally inclusive schools towards learners with little or no functional speech using communication devices. South African Journal of Education, 22(3), 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, T., Arthur-Kelly, M., Foreman, P., Balandin, S., & Mathisen, B. (2011). Complex contextual influences on the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(5), 422–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, T., Arthur-Kelly, M., Mathisen, B., Foreman, P., & Balandin, S. (2010). Where are teachers’ voices? A research agenda to enhance the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities at school. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(13), 1059–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, C., Shane, H. C., & Hemsley, B. (2014). Exploring the feasibility of the visual language in autism program for children in an early intervention group setting: Views of parents, educators, and health professionals. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17(2), 115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, J. E., Ryndak, D. L., & Clark, D. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(2), 112–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., Koppenhaver, D., Yoder, D. E., & Nance, J. (1997). Integrated communication and literacy instruction for a child with multiple disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 142–150.
   Google Scholar
• Frea, W. D., Arnold, C. L., & Vittimberga, G. L. (2001). A demonstration of the effects of augmentative communication on the extreme aggressive behavior of a child with autism within an integrated preschool setting. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3(4), 194–198.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M. (2000). Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M. F., Dennis, R., Cloninger, C., Edelman, S., & Schattman, R. (1993). “I’ve counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59(4), 359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Strain, P. S., Todd, A. W., & Reed, H. K. (2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 423–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E., & Bailey-Orr, M. (2012). Using AAC to support language comprehension. In S. Johnston, J. Reichle, K. Feeley, & E. Jones (Eds.), AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 311–345). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Light, J. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(2), 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J. E. (2003). The effects of an educational assistant instructional program on the communicative turns of students who use augmentative and alternative communication during book reading activities.
   Google Scholar
• Kessel, L., & Sickman, L. S. (2010). Undergraduate elementary education majors’ knowledge of Augmentative and Alternative Communication. SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(4), 100–107.
   Google Scholar
• LeRoy, B., & Simpson, C. (1996). Improving student outcomes through inclusive education. Support for Learning, 11(1), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(4), 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2005). The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: The evaluation of a peer-training program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(4), 278–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, P., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Roles and responsibilities of special education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 200–214.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III - contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashburn, A. J., Justice, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Peer effects on children’s language achievement during pre‐kindergarten. Child Development, 80(3), 686–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1992). “Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults.”. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S., & Nwaogu, P. (2009). Barriers to teaching non‐speaking learners with intellectual disabilities and their impact on the provision of augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56(4), 349–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R., & Khamis-Dakwar, R. (2005). An AAC training program for special education teachers: A case study of Palestinian Arab teachers in Israel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestwich, A., Kenworthy, J. B., Wilson, M., & Kwan‐Tat, N. (2008). Differential relations between two types of contact and implicit and explicit racial attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 575–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, J. (2001). The importance of addressing problem behavior among beginning communicators. Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 76–83.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(4), 281–285.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R., Barton-Hulsey, A., & Whitmore, A. (2015). Early intervention and AAC: What a difference 30 years makes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(3), 181–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., McGhie-Richmond, D., Blackstien-Adler, S., Mirenda, P., Antonius, K., & Janzen, P. (2000). Training a school team to integrate technology meaningfully into the curriculum: Effects on student participation. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R., & Romski, M. A. (2002). The role of language comprehension in establishing early augmented conversations. In J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary strategies for beginning communicators. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, K., Beukelman, D., & Bird, A. (1998). Survey of school speech and language service provision to students with severe communication impairments in Nebraska. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(4), 212–221.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1997). Special education teacher attitudes toward AAC: Preliminary survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(3), 186–197.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Goetz, L. (1998). Self-efficacy beliefs and the education of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(2), 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Müller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(2), 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D. E., Gillon, G. G., & Yoder, D. E. (2005). AAC use and service provision: A survey of New Zealand speech- language therapists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tönsing, K. M., & Dada, S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of implementation of aided AAC to support expressive communication in South African special schools: A pilot investigation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 282–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormnaes, S., & Malek, Y. A. (2004). Egyptian speech therapists want more knowledge about augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 30–42.
   Google Scholar