1,809
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Identifying gaps in climate change education - a case study in Austrian schools

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon

References

  • APCC. (2014). Österreichischer Sachstandsbericht Klimawandel 2014 (AAR14). Austrian Panel on Climate Change (APCC). Wien, Österreich: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. ISBN 978-3-7001-7699-2.
  • Austrian Federal Chancellery (2020). Austria and the 2030 Agenda. Voluntary National Review – Report on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/26512VNR_2020_Austria_Report_English.pdf
  • Barr, S. (2006). Environmental action in the home: Investigating the ‘value-action’ gap. Geography, 91(1), 43–54.
  • Berry, T. (1988). The dream of the earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
  • Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value–action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278.
  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984.
  • Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public under-standing of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16.
  • Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Beek, W., Linnebank, F., Gracia, J., Lozano, E., … Mioduser, D. (2013). DynaLearn – An intelligent learning environment for learning conceptual knowledge. AI Magazine, 34(4), 46–65.
  • Cañas, A. J., Carff, R., Hill, G., Carvalho, M., Arguedas, M., Eskridge, T. C., … Carvajal, R. (2005). Concept maps: Integrating knowledge and information visualization. In S.-O. Tergan, & T. Keller (Eds). Knowledge and information visualization: Searching for synergies. Heidelberg/New York: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  • Chang, C. H., Chatterjea, K., Goh, D. H. L., Theng, Y. L., Lim, E. P., Sun, A., … Nguyen, Q. M. (2012). Lessons from learner experiences in a field-based inquiry in geography using mobile devices. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(1), 41–58.
  • Chang, C.-H. (2015). Teaching climate change – A fad or a necessity? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(3), 181–183.
  • Chang, C.-H., & Pascua, L. (2016). Singapore students’ misconceptions of climate change. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(1), 84–96.
  • Chang, C. H., Wu, B. S., Seow, T., & Irvine, K. (Eds.). (2018). Learning geography beyond the traditional classroom. In Examples from Peninsular Southeast Asia. Singapore: Springer. ISBN: 978-981-10-8705-9.
  • Chiari, S., Völler, S., & Mandl, S. (2016). Wie lassen sich Jugendliche für Klimathemen begeistern? Chancen und Hürden in der Klimakommunikation. [How to make climate themes attractive for young people? Opportunities and obstacles in climate communication]. GW-Unterricht, 141, 5–18.
  • Comberti, C., Thornton, T. F., Wyllie de Echeverria, V., & Patterson, T. (2015). Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Global Environmental Change, 34, 247–262.
  • Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534.
  • Cox, M., Elen, J., & Steegen, A. (2019). Systems thinking in geography: Can high school students do it? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 37–52.
  • Cox, M., Elen, J., & Steegen, A. (2020). Fostering students geographic systems thinking by enriching causal diagrams with scale. Results of an intervention study. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(2), 112–128.
  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Rousell, D. (2020). The mesh of playing, theorizing, and researching in the reality of climate change: Creating the co-research playspace. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, K. Malone, and E. Barrett-Hacking (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_14
  • Deffner, J., & Haase, P. (2018). The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 35–50. Resilience Alliance, Dedham, Ma., USA.
  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendoerfer, P. (1992). Persönliches Umweltverhalten: Die Diskrepanz zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 44, 226–251.
  • Dijkstra, E. M., & Goedhart, M. J. (2012). Development and Validation of the ACSI: Measuring students’ science attitudes, pro-environmental behaviour, climate change attitudes and knowledge. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 733–749.
  • European Commission EC. (2017). Special Eurobarometer 459 - Climate Change. Survey requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Climate Action and co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication, performed by TNS opinion & social.
  • European Commission EC. (2019). Special Eurobarometer 490 - Climate Change. Survey requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Climate Action and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication, performed by Kantar.
  • Feierabend, T., & Eilks, I. (2018). Innovating science teaching by participatory action research-reflections from an interdisciplinary project of curriculum innovation on teaching about climate change. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 93–112. ISSN-1855-9719.
  • Feinstein, N. W., & Mach, K. J. (2020). Three roles for education in climate change adaptation. Climate Policy, 20(3), 317–322.
  • Feldbacher, E., Pölz, E., Panzenböck, M., & Weigelhofer, G. (2018). Citizen Science with Schools—Obstacles and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2017. ISBN: 978-2-88945-367-2.
  • Fietkau, H.-J., & Kessel, H. (1981). Umweltlernen: Veränderungsmöglichkeiten des Umweltbewusstseins. Koenigstein, Hain: Modell-Erfahrungen. ISBN 3-445-02052-3.
  • Fliegenschnee, M., & Schelakovsky, M. (1998). Umweltpsychologie und Umweltbildung: Eine Einführung aus humanökologischer Sicht. Wien: Facultas Universitäts Verlag. ISBN 3-85076-449-4.
  • France, D., Lee, R., Maclachlan, J., & McPhee, S. R. (2021). Should you be using mobile technologies in teaching? Applying a pedagogical framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 45(2), 221–237.
  • Genc, M. (2015). The project-based learning approach in environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(2), 105–117.
  • Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: Drivers, re-sponses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 801–827.
  • Gifford, R. (2013). Dragons, mules, and honeybees: Barriers, carriers, and unwitting enablers of climate change action. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 69(4), 41–48.
  • Glaser, M., Krause, G., Ratter, B. M., & Welp, M., (2012). Human-nature interactions in the anthropocene: Potentials of social-ecological systems analysis. Routledge: London. ISBN 9781138008854.
  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
  • Hermans, M., & Korhonen, J. (2017). Ninth graders and climate change: Attitudes towards consequenc-es, views on mitigation, and predictors of willingness to act. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 223–239.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53–61.
  • Hofstra, N., & Huisingh, D. (2014). Eco-innovations characterized: A taxonomic classification of relationships between humans and nature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 459–468.
  • Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362.
  • IPCC Core Writing Team. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 151 pp.
  • IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.
  • Jackson, L., & Pang, M. (2017). Secondary school students’ views of climate change in Hong Kong. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(3), 180–192.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems. New York: Routledge.
  • Kagawa, F., & Selby, D. (2012). Ready for the storm: Education for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(2), 207–217.
  • Keller, L., Stötter, J., Oberrauch, A., Kuthe, A., Körfgen, A., & Hüfner, K. (2019). Changing Climate Change Education: Exploring moderate constructivist and transdisciplinary approaches through the research-education cooperation k.i.d.Z.21. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 28(1), 35–43.
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
  • Kuthe, A., Keller, L., Körfgen, A., Stötter, J., Oberrauch, A., & Höferl, K. (2019a). How many young gen-erations are there? – A typology of teenagers’ climate change awareness in Austria and Germany. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 172–182.
  • Kuthe, A., Körfgen, A., Stötter, J., Keller, L., Riede, M., & Oberrauch, A. (2019b). Strengthening personal concern and the willingness to act through climate change communication. In W. Leal Filho, B. Lackner, & H. McGhie (Eds.), Addressing the challenges in communicating climate change across various audiences. Climate change management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98294-6_5
  • Lejarraga, T. (2010). When experience is better than description: Time delays and complexity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(1), 100–116.
  • Lidstone, J., & Stoltman, J. P. (2008). Global environmental change: What is the role of geography and environmental education? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(2), 89–92.
  • Liu, H., Fang, C., & Fang, K. (2020). Coupled Human and Natural Cube: A novel framework for analyzing the multiple interactions between humans and nature. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(3), 355–377.
  • Markowitz, E. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2012). Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2(4), 243–247.
  • McCright, A. M., O’Shea, B. W., Sweeder, R. D., Urquhart, G. R., & Zeleke, A. (2013). Promoting inter-disciplinarity through climate change education. Nature Climate Change, 3(8), 713–716.
  • Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812.
  • Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. In R. Norgaard, D. Schlosberg, & J. Dryzek (Eds.). Oxford handbook of climate change and society, 161–174. Oxford University Press.
  • Moser, S. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? WIREs Climate Change, 7(3), 345–369.
  • Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2013). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 343–347.
  • Nkoana, E. M. (2020). Exploring the effects of an environmental education course on the awareness and perceptions of climate change risks among seventh and eighth grade learners in South Africa. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(1), 7–22.
  • Oliver-Hoyo, M. T., & Allen, D. (2005). Attitudinal effects of a student-centered active learning environment. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(6), 944–949.
  • Powell, J. (2017). Scientists reach 100% consensus on anthropogenic global warming. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 37(4), 183–184.
  • Reid, A., Dillon, J., Ardoin, N., & Ferreira, J. (2021). Scientists’ warnings and the need to reimagine, recreate, and restore environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 783–795.
  • Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146–163.
  • Rousell, D., & Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, A. (2020). A systematic review of climate change education: Giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change. Children’s Geographies, 18(2), 191–208.
  • Schauss, M., & Sprenger, S. (2021). Students’ conceptions of uncertainties in the context of climate change. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(4), 332–347.
  • Scheuch, M., & Sippl, C. (2019). Wasser lernen im Anthropozän. Fächerverbindender Sachunterricht in der Primarstufe. [Learning with Water in the Anthropocene. Interdisciplinary Learning in Grade Primary]. R&E-Source, p. 14. Retrieved from https://journal.ph-noe.ac.at/index.php/resource/article/view/659
  • Schmidt, H. G. (1995). Problem-based learning: An introduction. Instructional Science, 22(4), 247–250. www.jstor.org/stable/23369986.
  • Sebastián-López, M., & de Miguel González, R. (2020). Mobile learning for sustainable development and environmental teacher education. Sustainability, 12(22), 9757.
  • Shah, H. R., & Martinez, L. R. (2016). Current approaches in implementing citizen science in the class-room. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(1), 17–22.
  • Smol, J. P. (2018). A crisis in science literacy and communication: Does reluctance to engage the public make academic scientists complicit? FACETS, 3(1), 952–957.
  • Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.
  • Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., … Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthro-pocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(33), 8252–8259.
  • Thornhill, I., Loiselle, S., Lind, K., & Ophof, D. (2016). The citizen science opportunity for researchers and agencies. BioScience, 66(9), 720–721.
  • Trebitz, K. I., & Wulfhorst, J. D. (2021). Relating social networks, ecological health, and reservoir basin governance. River Research and Applications, 37(2), 198–208.
  • UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
  • UNESCO. (2015). SDG4-Education 2030, Incheon Declaration (ID) and Framework for Action. For the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4, Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning Opportunities for All, ED-2016/WS/28
  • Vinuesa, A., Mucova, R., Azeiteiro, U., Cartea, P., & Pereira, M. (2022). Mozambican students’ knowledge and perceptions about climate change: An exploratory study in Pemba City. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31(1), 5–21.
  • Vitone, T., Stofer, K. A., Steininger, M. S., Hulcr, J., Dunn, R., & Lucky, A. (2016). School of ants goes to college: Integrating citizen science into the general education classroom increases engagement with science. Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), A03.
  • Vörösmarty, C. J., Meybeck, M., & Pastore, C. L. (2015). Impair-then-repair: A brief history & global-scale hypothesis regarding human-water interactions in the anthropocene. Daedalus, 144(3), 94–109.
  • Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332–342.
  • Weigelhofer, G., Pölz, E., & Hein, T. (2019). Citizen science: How high school students can provide scientifically sound data in biogeochemical experiments. Freshwater Science, 38(2), 236–243.
  • Weigelhofer, G., & Feldbacher, E. (2020). Nachhaltiges Lernen durch Verstehen von Zusammenhängen. [Sustainable learning by understanding complex relationships]. In C. Sippl, E. Rauscher, & M. Scheuch (Eds). Das Anthropozän lernen und lehren [Teaching and learning the Anthropocene], 563–577, Studienverlag, Innsbruck.
  • Weinstein, M. (2012). Schools/citizen science. A response to “the future of citizen science. Democracy Educ, 20(6), 1–3. https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss1/6.
  • Wibeck, V. (2014). Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change – Some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 387–411.
  • Williams, J. C. (2010). Understanding the place of humans in nature. In M. Reuss and S. Cutcliffe (Eds.), Illusory boundary: Technology and the environment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Winter, V., Kranz, J., & Möller, A. (2022). Climate change education challenges from two different perspectives of change agents: Perceptions of school students and pre-service teachers. Sustainability, 14(10), 6081.
  • Wu, J., & Otsuka, Y. (2021). Pro-climate behaviour and the influence of learning sources on it in Chinese adolescents. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(1), 24–38.
  • Zoellick, B., Nelson, S. J., & Schauffler, M. (2012). Participatory science and education: Bringing both views into focus. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 310–313.