1,048
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Investigations

Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies

, &

References

  • Huwendiek S, Mennin S, Dern P, Friedman Ben-David M, Van Der Vleuten C, Tönshoff B, et al. Expertise, needs and challanges of medical educators: Results of an international web survey. Medical Teacher 2010;32:912–8.
  • Eva KW, Hodges BD. Scylla or Charybdis? Can we navigate between objectification and judgement in assessment? Medical Education 2012;46:914–9.
  • Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: Learning to love the subjective and collective. Medical Teacher 2013;35:564–8.
  • Gingerich A, Regehr G, Eva KW. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: Rethinking the etiology of rater errors. Academic Medicine 2011;86:S1–S7.
  • Yeates P, O'Neill P, Mann K, Eva KW. Seeing the same thing differently: Mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2012;18:325–41.
  • Govaerts M, Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C, Muijtjens A. Workplace-based assessment: Effects of rater expertise. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2012;16:151–65.
  • Govaerts M, van de Wiel M, Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C. Workplace-based assessment: Raters' performance theories and constructs. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2011;18:375–96.
  • Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe E. Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: A conceptual model. Medical Education 2011;45:1048–60.
  • Williams RG, Verhulst S, Colliver JA, Dunnington GL. Assuring the reliability of resident performance appraisals: More items or more observations? Surgery 2005;137:141–7.
  • Eva KW, Solomon P, Neville AJ, Ladouceur M, Kaufman K, Walsh A, et al. Using a sampling strategy to address psychometric challenges in tutorial-based assessments. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2007;12:19–33.
  • Frank JR. (Ed.). The CanMEDS 2005 Physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa, Canada: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2005.
  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements. Chicago, IL: ACGME, 2003. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2015.
  • Tavares W, Eva KW. Exploring the impact of mental workload on rater-based assessments. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2012;18:291–303.
  • Byrne A, Tweed N, Halligan C. A pilot study of the mental workload of OSCE examiners. Medical Education 2014;48:262–7.
  • Tavares W, Eva KW. The impact of rating demands on rater-based assessment of clinical competence. Education in Primary Care 2014;25:308–18.
  • Tavares W, Boet S, Theriault R, Mallette T, Eva KW. Global rating scale for the assessment of paramedic clinical competence. Prehospital Emergency Care 2012;17:57–67.
  • Tavares W, LeBlanc VR, Mausz J, Sun V, Eva KW. Simulation-based assessment of paramedics and performance in real clinical contexts. Prehospital Emergency Care 2014;18:116–22.
  • Wind LA, Van Dalen J, Muijtjens A, Rethans JJ. Assessing simulated patients in an educational setting: The MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients). Medical Education 2004;38:39–44.
  • Paas F, van Merriënboer JJG. Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1994;79:419–30.
  • Brennan RL. Generalizability theory. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 2001.
  • Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2008;62:107–15.
  • Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis: London, UK: Sage, 2006.
  • van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LW, Scheele F, Driessen E, Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: Building blocks for theory development. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2010;24:703–19.
  • Baddeley A. Working memory. Science 1992;31:556–9.
  • Wickens CD, Carswell C. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, third edition. (G Salvendy. Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006.
  • Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 1988;12:257–85.
  • Melchers KG, Kleinmann M, Prinz MA. Do assessors have too much on their plates? The effects of simultaneously rating multiple assessment center candidates on rating quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2010;18:329–41.
  • Williams R, Klamen D, McGaghie W. Special article: Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2003;15:270–92.
  • Hodges B. Validity and the OSCE. Medical Teacher 2003;25:250–4.
  • Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, fourth ed. New York, NY: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2008.
  • Downing S. Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education 2003;37:830–7.
  • Landy FJ, Farr JL. Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin 1980;87:72–107.
  • Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: Assessor cognition from three different research perspectives. Medical Education 2014;48:1055–68.
  • Norman G, Vleuten C, Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: Issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Medical Education 1991;25:119–26.
  • Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Medical Education 2002;36:800–4.
  • van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education 1996;1:41–67.
  • Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 1977;84:231–59.
  • van Merrienboer JJG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: Design principles and strategies. Medical Education 2010;44:85–93.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.