“It's Just Not the Culture”: A Qualitative Study Exploring Residents' Perceptions of the Impact of Institutional Culture on Feedback

References

• Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: Learning to love the subjective and collective. Medical Teacher 2013;35:564–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts M, van der Vleuten CP. Validity in work-based assessment: Expanding our horizons. Medical Education 2013;47:1164–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D. Feedback: Ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. Clinical Teacher 2015;12:3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D, Molloy E. Feedback in higher and professional education: understanding it and doing it well. London, UK: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Krackov SK. Expanding the horizon for feedback. Medical Teacher 2011;33:873–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. Journal of the American Medical Association 2009;302:1330–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch WT Jr., Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Academic Medicine 2002;77:1185–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson PA. Giving feedback on clinical skills: Are we starving our young? Journal of Graduate Medical Education 2012;4:154–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van de Ridder JM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OT. What is feedback in clinical education? Medical Education 2008;42:189–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, McNaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. Providing feedback: Exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Medical Teacher 2011;33:744–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ. Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: Feedback at the crossroads. Medical Teacher 2014;36:692–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delva D, Sargeant J, Miller S, Holland J, Brown PA, Leblanc C, et al. Encouraging residents to seek feedback. Medical Teacher 2013;35:e1625–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Schuwirth L, Wass V, van der Vleuten C. Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment. Advances in Health Science Research 2015;20:229–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: Professional culture and its influence on feedback. Medical Education 2013;47:585–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ridder JM, McGaghie WC, Stokking KM, ten Cate OT. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: A meta-review. Medical Education 2015;49:658–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok HG, Jaarsma DA, Spruijt A, Van Beukelen P, Van Der Vleuten CP, Teunissen PW. Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships. Medical Teacher 2015;38:88–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JP, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma DADC, et al. Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Medical Education 2013;47:282–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Academic Medicine 2009;84:910–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crommelinck M, Anseel F. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: A literature review. Medical Education 2013;47:232–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watling CJ, Lingard L. Toward meaningful evaluation of medical trainees: The influence of participants' perceptions of the process. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2012;17:183–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, et al. Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Academic Medicine 2011;86:1120–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2012;17:15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007;77:81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menachery EP, Knight AM, Kolodner K, Wright SM. Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006;21:440–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy E, Boud D. Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: The learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Medical Education 2013;47:227–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London M, Smither JW. Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review 2002;12:81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bose MM, Gijselaers WH. Why supervisors should promote feedback-seeking behaviour in medical residency. Medical Teacher 2013;35:e1573–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L, Eva KW. Reading between the lines: Faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments. Medical Education 2015;49:296–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten C, Eva KW, Lingard L. Hedging to save face: A linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports. Advances in Health Sciences Education 2016;21:175–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Medical Education 2006;40:101–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson JL, Balmer DF, Giardino AP. Qualitative research methods for medical educators. Academic Pediatrics 2011;11:375–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal 1995;311:299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London, UK: Sage, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, McNaughton N, Van Mook WN. Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Medical Teacher 2014;36:923–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt D. On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report 2007;12:82–101.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Foley WA. Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser B. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 1990;14:219–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson S. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Schein EH. Organizational culture and leadership. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn R, Spreitzer G. The psychometrics of the competing values culture instrument and an analysis of the impact of organizational culture on the quality of life. Research in Organizational Change and Development 1991;5:115–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jippes M, Driessen EW, Broers NJ, Majoor GD, Gijselaers WH, van der Vleuten CP. Culture matters in successful curriculum change: An international study of the influence of national and organizational culture tested with multilevel structural equation modeling. Academic Medicine 2015;90:921–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future possibilities. Medical Education 2011;45:60–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, Holmboe E, Silver I, Armson H, et al. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: Developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Academic Medicine 2015;90:1698–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Seidel T, van Merriënboer JJ. Participatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instructional Science 2014;42:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Könings KD, Brand-Gruwel S, van Merriënboer JJ. Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2005;75:645–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Dojeiji S, Day K, Varpio L. Feedback to supervisors: Is anonymity really so important? Academic Medicine 2016;91:1305–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabeo EC, Holtman MC, Ginsburg S, Rosenbaum JR, Holmboe ES. Lost in transition: The experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Academic Medicine 2011;86:591–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmboe E, Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E. The rotational approach to medical education: Time to confront our assumptions? Medical Education 2011;45:69–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar