Online collaborative learning: does it improve college students’ critical reading skills?

References

• Alvarez, I., Espava, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, R., Smyth, J., Rickard, A., Bolt, N. Q., & Metcalfe, N. (2010). Collaborative digital learning in schools: Teacher perceptions of purpose and effectiveness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.513765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blayone, T. J. B., Mykhailenko, O., vanOostveen, R., Grebeshkov, O., Hrebeshkova, O., & Vostryakov, O. (2018). Surveying digital competencies of university students and professors in Ukraine for fully online collaborative learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1391871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., & Windeatt, S. (2016). Developing collaborative learning practices in an online language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1271–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1274331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, R., & Correia, A. P. (2020). Online students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning and sense of community. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2020). Effects of the group leadership promotion approach on students’ higher order thinking awareness and online interactive behavioral patterns in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. H., Yang, H. Y., Liang, T. H., & Chen, H. P. (2010). Elementary students’ participation style in synchronous online communication and collaboration. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29(6), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449291003686195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Wang, C., Zhou, M., Xu, J., Fan, X., & Lei, S. (2018). Group trust, communication media, and interactivity: Toward an integrated model of online collaborative learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1320565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Xu, J., & Fan, X. (2015). Help seeking in online collaborative groupwork: A multilevel analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.897962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest, P., Heiser, S., & Murphy, L. (2013). Developing teacher skills to support collaborative online language learning. The Language Learning Journal, 41(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.625095
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Y. Y. H. (2004). Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051042000224743
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo, M., Heiser, S., & McLaughlin, X. A. (2017). Developing pedagogical expertise in modern language learning and specific learning difficulties through collaborative and open educational practices. The Language Learning Journal, 45(4), 518–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1010447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasch, T., Espava, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A., & Piazza, S. V. (2008). Critically reading texts: What students do and how teachers can help. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jocius, R., & Shealy, S. (2017). Critical book clubs: Reimagining literature reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 71(6), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, A. (2019). Travelling with and teaching critical literacy in Singapore, Australia, and Hong Kong: A call for postcritique. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2019.1593788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooloos, J. G. M., Klaassen, T., Vereijken, M., van Kuppeveld, S., Bolhuis, S., & Vorstenbosch, M. (2011). Collaborative group work: Effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 983–988. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.588733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. J. (2016). A Habermasian approach to critical reading. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(6), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1058218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Margaliot, A., & Gorev, D. (2020). Once they’ve experienced it, will pre-service teachers be willing to apply online collaborative learning? Computers in the School, 37(4), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2020.1834821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaliot, A., Gorev, D., & Vaisman, T. (2013). How student teachers describe the online collaborative learning experience and evaluate its contribution to their learning and their future work as teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1416710
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2019). Critical expressionism: Expanding reader response in critical literacy. The Reading Teacher, 73(5), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelman, L. (2007). Critical thinking and reading. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(4), 300–302. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monterio, E., & Morrison, K. (2014). Challenges for collaborative blended learning in undergraduate students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(7-8), 564–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.997126
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, N. M., & Shonfeld, M. (2018). The impact of an online collaborative learning program on students’ attitude towards technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1376336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C. W. (2017). The effects of digital storytelling on student achievement, social presence, and attitude in online collaborative learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1135173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson, M., & Uematsu, K. (2013). Collaborative learning, face-to-face or virtual: The advantages of a blended learning approach in an intercultural research group. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36(3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.819324
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61(2), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, K. (2014). Enacting critical literacy in English classrooms: How a teacher learning community supported critical inquiry. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 58(5), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., & Weinberger, A. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, L. P., & Bean, T. W. (2007). Critical literacy: Context, research, and practice in the K-12 classroom. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Such, B. (2021). Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, P. (2014). Making the familiar strange and the strange familiar: A project for teaching critical reading and writing. Language and Education, 28(6), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.921191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2003). Building active online interaction via a collaborative learning community. Computers in the Schools, 20(3), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v20n03_07
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., & Wray, A. (2011). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. (2016). Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y., & Wang, S. M. (2020). Exploring the effects of gender grouping and the cognitive processing patterns of a facebook-based online collaborative learning activity. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Cheng, S. L., & İzmirli, S. (2017). The interactions between facilitator identity, conflictual presence, and social presence in peermoderated online collaborative learning. Distance Education, 38(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., Peng, S. W., & Hung, J. L. (2009). Online collaborative learning in a project-based learning environment in Taiwan: A case study on undergraduate students’ perspectives. Educational Media International, 46(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980902933425
   Google Scholar