References
- World Physiotherapy [Internet]. London (UK): World Confederation for Physical Therapy; c2021. What is physiotherapy? [cited 2021 Apr 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: https://world.physio/resources/what-is-physiotherapy.
- Smith SN, Crocker AF. Experiential learning in physical therapy education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:427–433.
- Volansky K. What are best practices to teach “hands-on” skills in a blended environment? J Appl Learn Teach. 2020;3:80–89.
- Harwood KJ, McDonald PL, Butler JT, et al. Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):240. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 29] [9 p.]. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7
- Volansky K. Physical therapist educators’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges to teach “hands-on” skills in a blended environment. Q Rev Distance Educ. 2019;20:11–29.
- Global Task Force on Physiotherapist Education. Immediate impact on students and the response to delivering physiotherapist entry level education: the third briefing paper of the World Physiotherapy response to COVID-19 [Internet]. London (UK): World Confederation for Physical Therapy; 2020 June [cited 2021 Apr 29]. 12 p. Available from: https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2020-07/Education-Briefing-paper-3-Students-24-June-2020.pdf.
- Ng L, Seow KC, MacDonald L, et al. eLearning in physical therapy: lessons learned from transitioning a professional education program to full eLearning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Ther. 2021;101(4):101. [cited 2021 Apr 29]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/doi/10.1093/ptj/pzab082/6158909
- Jensen GM, Nordstrom T, Segal RL, et al. Education research in physical therapy: visions of the possible. Phys Ther. 2016;96(12):1874–1884.
- Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132–140.
- Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med Educ. 2017;51(6):585–597.
- Chen K-S, Monrouxe L, Lu Y-H, et al. Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2018;52(9):910–924.
- Evans L, Vanden Bosch ML, Harrington S, et al. Flipping the classroom in health care higher education: a systematic review. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(2):74–78.
- Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
- Arantes M, Arantes J, Ferreira MA. Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):94. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6
- Losco CD, Grant WD, Armson A, et al. Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: a BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. Med Teach. 2017;39(3):234–243.
- Wilson AB, Brown KM, Misch J, et al. Breaking with tradition: a scoping Meta-analysis analyzing the effects of student-centered learning and computer-aided instruction on student performance in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(1):61–73.
- Onyura B, Baker L, Cameron B, et al. Evidence for curricular and instructional design approaches in undergraduate medical education: an umbrella review. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):150–161.
- Car J, Carlstedt-Duke J, Tudor Car L, et al. Digital education in health professions: the need for overarching evidence synthesis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e12913. [cited 2021 Mar 16]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12913/
- Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I, et al. A critical review of evaluations of interprofessional education. London (UK): LTSN-Centre for Health Sciences and Practice; 2002.
- Center for Evidence-Based Practice [Internet]. Philadelphia (PA): Penn Medicine; c2017. Modified AMSTAR scale for appraisal of systematic reviews. 2016. [cited 2021 Apr 28]. Available from: http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep/methods/Modified%20AMSTAR.pdf.
- Ahmet A, Gamze K, Rustem M, et al. Is video-based education an effective method in surgical education? A systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(5):1150–1158.
- Cartledge P, Miller M, Phillips B. The use of social-networking sites in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):847–857.
- Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):893–901.
- Chipps J, Brysiewicz P, Mars M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of videoconference-based tele-education for medical and nursing education. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012;9(2):78–87.
- Dunleavy G, Nikolaou CK, Nifakos S, et al. Mobile digital education for health professions: systematic review and Meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e12937 [cited 2021 Apr 15] [17 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12937/
- Feng J-Y, Chang Y-T, Chang H-Y, et al. Systematic review of effectiveness of situated e-learning on medical and nursing education. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2013;10(3):174–183.
- Fontaine G, Cossette S, Maheu-Cadotte M-A, et al. Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025252. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [17 p.]. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252
- Gentry SV, Gauthier A, L'Estrade Ehrstrom B, et al. Serious gaming and gamification education in health professions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e12994 [cited 2021 Apr 15] [20 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2019/3/e12994/
- Gorbanev I, Agudelo-Londoño S, González RA, et al. A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1438718 [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [9 p.]. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10872981.2018.1438718
- Hadi Y. The effect of video-based learning on medical imaging students’ clinical performance. Radiol Sci Educ. 2019;24:29–41.
- Ilic D, Maloney S. Methods of teaching medical trainees evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2014;48(2):124–135.
- Jin J, Bridges SM. Educational technologies in problem-based learning in health sciences education: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e251[cited 2021 Apr 15] [13 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2014/12/e251/
- Koohestani HR, Soltani Arabshahi SK, Fata L, et al. The educational effects of mobile learning on students of medical sciences: a systematic review in experimental studies. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018;6(2):58–69.
- Kyaw BM, Posadzki P, Dunleavy G, et al. Offline digital education for medical students: systematic review and Meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e13165 [cited 2021 Apr 15] [16 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2019/3/e13165/
- Kyaw BM, Posadzki P, Paddock S, et al. Effectiveness of digital education on communication skills among medical students: systematic review and Meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(8):e12967 [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2019/8/e12967/
- Kyaw BM, Saxena N, Posadzki P, et al. Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and Meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e12959 [cited 2021 Apr 15] [13 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2019/1/e12959/
- Liaw SY, Carpio GAC, Lau Y, et al. Multiuser virtual worlds in healthcare education: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:136–149.
- Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, et al. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e2. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [19 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2016/1/e2/
- Mącznik AK, Ribeiro DC, Baxter GD. Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: a systematic review of effectiveness and users’ perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:160. [12 p.]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587774/pdf/12909_2015_Article_429.pdf
- Mi M, Wu W, Qiu M, et al. Use of mobile devices to access resources among health professions students: a systematic review. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016;35(1):64–82.
- Moreau KA, Eady K, Sikora L, et al. Digital storytelling in health professions education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):208. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [9 p.]. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-018-1320-1
- Nelson C, Hartling L, Campbell S, et al. The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 21. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e386–e405.
- Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [13 p.]. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
- Rankin A, Truskey M, Chisolm MS. The use of social media in interprofessional education: systematic review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e11328. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [9 p.]. Available from: https://mededu.jmir.org/2019/1/e11328/
- Taveira-Gomes T, Ferreira P, Taveira-Gomes I, et al. What are we looking for in computer-based learning interventions in medical education? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e204. [cited 2021 Apr 15] [21 p.]. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2016/8/e204/.
- Tenison E, Touger-Decker R. Impact of e-Learning or blended learning versus face-to-face learning in regard to physical examination skills, knowledge, and attitudes among health professions students. Top Clin Nutr. 2018;33(3):259–270.
- Tomlinson J, Shaw T, Munro A, et al. How does tele-learning compare with other forms of education delivery? A systematic review of tele-learning educational outcomes for health professionals. N S W Public Health Bull. 2013;24(2):70–75.
- Tudor Car L, Kyaw BM, Dunleavy G, et al. Digital problem-based learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e12945 [cited 2021 Apr 15] [12 p.]. Available from: https://www.jmir.org/2019/2/e12945/
- Wang R, DeMaria S, Goldberg A, et al. A systematic review of serious games in training health care professionals. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):41–51.
- Whyte W, Hennessy C. Social media use within medical education: a systematic review to develop a pilot questionnaire on how social media can be best used at BSMS. MedEdPublish [Internet]. 2017;6(2):6. [cited 2021 Apr 15]; [36 p.]. Available from: https://www.mededpublish.org/manuscripts/984/v1
- Xu X, Posadzki P, Lee G, et al. Digital education for health professions in the field of dermatology: a systematic review by digital health education collaboration. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(2):133–138.
- Yammine K, Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(6):525–538.
- Gagnon K, Young B, Bachman T, et al. Doctor of physical therapy education in a hybrid learning environment: reimagining the possibilities and navigating a “new normal”. Phys Ther. 2020;100(8):1268–1277.
- Ødegaard NB, Myrhaug HT, Dahl-Michelsen T, et al. Digital learning designs in physiotherapy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):48. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 29];21:[18 p.]. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-020-02483-w