Development of complex pedagogical competencies and reflexivity in clinical teachers via distance learning: a mixed methods study

References

• Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):98–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning S, Artino AR Jr, Pangaro L, et al. Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert’s voice. Med Educ. 2011;45(9):927–938. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04053.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szumacher E, Catton P, Jones GA, et al. Helping learners in difficulty – the incidence and effectiveness of remedial programmes of the medical radiation sciences programme at university of Toronto and the Michener institute for applied sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007;36(9):725–734. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V36N9p725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao DC, Wright SM. National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284(9):1099–1104. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.9.1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwind CJ, Williams RG, Boehler ML, et al. Do individual attendings’ post-rotation performance ratings detect residents’ clinical performance deficiencies? Acad Med. 2004;79(5):453–457. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200405000-00016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audétat MC, Dory M, Nendaz M, et al. What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning difficulties? Med Educ. 2012;46(2):216–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04151.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CS, Stevens NG, Servis M. A general framework for approaching residents in difficulty. Fam Med. 2007;39(5):331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks PJ, Cox SM, Espey EL, et al. To the point: medical education reviews—dealing with student difficulties in the clinical setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):1915–1922. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt D, Carline J, Tonesk X, et al. Types of problem students encountered by clinical teachers on clerkships. Med Educ. 1989;23(1):14–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1989.tb00806.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Mamede S. How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: a narrative review and a proposal. Med Educ. 2015;49(10):961–973. doi: 10.1111/medu.12775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audétat MC, Laurin S, Dory M, et al. Diagnosis and management of clinical reasoning difficulties: part I. Clinical reasoning supervision and educational diagnosis. Med Teach. 2017;39(8):792–796. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1331033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education part 1: learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):455–473. doi: 10.1080/01421590802108331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters K, Ellaway R. E-learning in medical education guide 32 part 2: technology, management and design. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):474–489. doi: 10.1080/01421590802108349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters K, Ellaway RH, Topps D, et al. Mobile technologies in medical education: AMEE guide No. 105. Med Teach. 2016;38(6):537–549. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1141190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George PP, Papachristou N, Belisario JM, et al. Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: a systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1). doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moule P, Ward R, Lockyer L. Nursing and healthcare students’ experiences and use of e‐learning in higher education. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(12):2785–2795. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05453.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson F, Olofsson AD. Implementing distance teaching at a large scale in medical education: a struggle between dominant and non-dominant teaching activities. Educ Inf Technol. 2015;20(2):359–380. doi: 10.1007/s10639-013-9289-1
   Google Scholar
• Saiyad S, Virk A, Mahajan R, et al. Online teaching in medical training: establishing good online teaching practices from cumulative experience. Int J App Basic Med Res. 2020;10(3):149. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_358_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson J, McCormick R. Ten Pedagogic principles for e-learning. In: McCluskey A, editor. Policy and Innovation in Education. Quality Criteria. Brussels: European Schoolne; 2005. p. 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rossettini G, Turolla A, Gudjonsdottir B, et al. Digital entry-level education in physiotherapy: a commentary to Inform post-COVID-19 future directions. Med Sci Educator. 2021;31(6):2071–2083. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01439-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longhini J, Rossettini G, Palese A. Massive open online courses for nurses’ and healthcare professionals’ continuous education: a scoping review. Int Nurs Rev. 2021;68(1):108–121. doi: 10.1111/inr.12649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan K. Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2014;15(1):133–160. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Guo L, He L, et al. Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: insights from MOOC. Behav Inf Technol. 2019;38(6):621–636. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1549595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irby DM. Excellence in clinical teaching: knowledge transformation and development required. Med Educ. 2014;48(8):776–784. doi: 10.1111/medu.12507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caire Fon N, Poellhuber B, Audétat MC, et al. Les Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) sont-ils une méthode utile en pédagogie médicale? Éléments de réponse avec l’exemple du MOOC-Processus de raisonnement clinique. Pédagogie Médicale. 2017;18(2):47–50. doi: 10.1051/pmed/2018001
   Google Scholar
• Caire Fon N, Audétat MC, Bertrand ME, et al. Processus de raisonnement clinique [MOOC Edulib]; n.d. Available from: https://cours.edulib.org/courses/course-v1:UMontreal+PRC.5+A2018/about.
   Google Scholar
• Santen S. Enseigner et évaluer les capacités cliniques [MOOC Coursera]; n.d. 2021. Available from: https://www.coursera.org/learn/clinical-skills?ranMID=40328&ranEAID=SAyYsTvLiGQ&ranSiteID=SAyYsTvLiGQ-bRoyLfGGneHv47GJR_pC.A&siteID=SAyYsTvLiGQ-bRoyLfGGneHv47GJR_pC.A&utm_content=10&utm_medium=partners&utm_source=linkshare&utm_campaign=SAyYsTvLiGQ.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues V. Clinical Supervision: Teaching And Facilitating Learning [MOOC Future Learn]; n.d. Available from: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/clinical-supervision-teaching-facilitating.
   Google Scholar
• Nash R Clinical Supervision For Health Professionals [MOOC Future Learn]; n.d. Available from: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/clinical-supervision-health.
   Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Be FAIR to students: four principles that lead to more effective learning. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):27–31. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.732717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: AMEE guide No. 63. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):e102–e115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman R, Salas E. The transfer of training: what really matters. Int J Train Dev. 2011;15(2):103–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x
   Google Scholar
• Yelon SL, Ford JK, Anderson WA. Twelve tips for increasing transfer of training from faculty development programs. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):945–950. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.929098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Cate O, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, et al. Entrustment decision making: extending Miller’s pyramid. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):199–204. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Amending Miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):180–185. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel M, Gordon M, Patricio M, et al. An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME scoping review: BEME guide No. 64. Med Teach. 2021;43(3):253–271. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1864310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojan J, Haas M, Thammasitboon S, et al. Online learning developments in undergraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a BEME systematic review: BEME guide No. 69. Med Teach. 2022;44(2):109–129. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1992373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos RA, Carvalho DRS, Brandão CFS, et al. Solutions, enablers and barriers to online learning in clinical medical education during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review. Med Teach. 2022;44(2):187–195. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1973979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelaccia T, Demeester A, Charlin B, et al. Le déploiement de la formation à distance au sein des facultés de médecine dans le contexte de la crise sanitaire liée à la COVID-19: et après? Pédagogie Médicale. 2020;21(4):173–174. doi: 10.1051/pmed/2020055
   Google Scholar
• Brady AK, Pradhan D. Learning without borders: asynchronous and distance learning in the age of COVID-19 and beyond. ATS Scholar. 2020;1(3):233–242. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0046PS
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson A, McKinnon T, Prior SD, et al. COVID-19: time for a bold new strategy for medical education. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1764741. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1764741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquinot G. Apprivoiser la distance et supprimer l’absence ? ou les défis de la formation à distance. Revue Française de Pédagogie. 1993;102(1):55–67. doi: 10.3406/rfp.1993.1305
   Google Scholar
• Peraya D. Un regard critique sur les concepts de médiatisation et médiation: nouvelles pratiques, nouvelle modélisation. Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication. 2008;9(2). https://lesenjeux.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/2008/supplement-a/12-un-regard-critique-sur-les-concepts-de-mediatisation-et-mediation-nouvelles-pratiques-nouvelle-modelisation/
   Google Scholar
• Carré P, Wright GM, Wadowska DW. Motifs et dynamique d’engagement en formation. Éducation permanente. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998;136(2):119–131. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(97)00220-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Audetat MC, Nendaz M, Caire Fon N, et al. Supervision du raisonnement clinique [MOOC Coursera]; n.d. Available from: https://www.coursera.org/learn/supervision-raisonnement-clinique.
   Google Scholar
• Audetat MC, Nendaz M, Caire Fon N, et al. Supervision du raisonnement clinique [MOOC Edulib]; n.d. Available from: https://cours.edulib.org/courses/course-v1:UMontreal+SRC-2.1+P2018/about.
   Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ. 1984;18(4):284–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01024.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE guide No. 44. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):685–695. doi: 10.1080/01421590903050374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–98. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltier C, Campion B, Wurth S, et al. Intentions pédagogiques et perceptions d’un dispositif de formation médiatisée : analyse de réception médiatique d’un MOOC à visée professionnalisante. Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire. 2023;20(1):35–55. doi: 10.18162/ritpu-2023-v20n1-03
   Google Scholar
• Boerboom TBB, Dolmand DHJM, Jaarsma D, et al. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers’ supervisory skills during clinical rotations. Med Teach. 2011;33(2):e84–e91. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.536277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, et al. The Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1732–1738. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f554d6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerboom TBB, Jaarsma D, Dolmans DHJM, et al. Peer group reflection helps clinical teachers to critically reflect on their teaching. Med Teach. 2011;33(11):e615–e623. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman M, Tai J, Kent F, et al. What should we teach the teachers? Identifying the learning priorities of clinical supervisors. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(1):29–41. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9772-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audetat Voirol M-C, Cerutti B, Rieder A, et al. Perceptions of clinical supervision in ambulatory settings: do supervisee and supervisors see eye to eye? Creative Educ. 2020;11(3):297–306. doi: 10.4236/ce.2020.113023
   Google Scholar
• Starr S, Ferguson WJ, Haley H-L, et al. Community preceptorsʼ views of their identities as teachers. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):820–825. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audétat M-C, Grégoire G, Fernandez N, et al. From intuition to professionalization: a qualitative study about the development of teacher identity in internal medicine senior residents. Int J Health Promot Educ. 2017;1(1):5–12. doi: 10.17267/2594-7907ijhe.v1i1.1234
   Google Scholar
• Starr S, Haley H-L, Mazor KM, et al. Initial testing of an instrument to measure teacher identity in physicians. Teach Learn Med. 2006;18(2):117–125. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler JT, Weston R, Voyles EC. Stuck in the middle: the use and interpretation of mid-points in items on questionnaires. J Gen Psychol. 2015;142(2):71–89. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.994590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347–364. doi: 10.1080/01421590802061613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, et al. AMEE guide No. 27: effective educational and clinical supervision. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):2–19. doi: 10.1080/01421590701210907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Mcallister L. Being a clinical educator. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12(2):187–200. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-5491-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, et al. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1178–1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02924.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller-Juge V, Pereira Miozzari AC, Rieder A, et al. A medical student in private practice for a 1-month clerkship: a qualitative exploration of the challenges for primary care clinical teachers. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:17. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S145449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho-Filho MA, Tio RA, Steinert Y. Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Med Teach. 2020;42(2):143–149. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1552782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone S, Ellers B, Holmes D, et al. Identifying oneself as a teacher: the perceptions of preceptors. Med Educ. 2002;36(2):180–185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01064.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2134–2156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana RM, Fortman J, DeVaney J. Advancing an approach of resilient design for learning by designing for extensibility, flexibility, and redundancy. In: Thurston TN, Lundstrom K, and González C, editors Resilient pedagogy: practical teaching strategies to overcome distance, disruption, and distraction. Utah State University; 2021. p. 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Côté L, Bordage G. Content and conceptual frameworks of preceptor feedback related to residents’ educational needs. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1274–1281. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182623073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira Miozzari AC, Rieder AR, Sader J, et al. Clinicians or teachers–why not both? Expanding the comfort zone of Swiss clinical teachers in private practice. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lubarsky S, Dory V, Audétat M-C, et al. Using script theory to cultivate illness script formation and clinical reasoning in health professions education. Can Med Educ J. 2015;6(2):e61–e70. doi: 10.36834/cmej.36631
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moghadami M, Amini M, Moghadami M, et al. Teaching clinical reasoning to undergraduate medical students by illness script method: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02522-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, O’Sullivan PS, Irby DM. Strengthening teachers’ professional identities through faculty development. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):963–968. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Macdonald ME. Why physicians teach: giving back by paying it forward. Med Educ. 2015;49(8):773–782. doi: 10.1111/medu.12782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu WC, Thistlethwaite JE, Weller J, et al. ‘It was serendipity’: a qualitative study of academic careers in medical education. Med Educ. 2015;49(11):1124–1136. doi: 10.1111/medu.12822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternszus R, Boudreau JD, Cruess RL, et al. Clinical teachers’ perceptions of their role in professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2020;95(10):1594–1599. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lankveld T, Thampy H, Cantillon P, et al. Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE guide No. 132. Med Teach. 2021;43(2):124–136. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poellhuber B, Roy N, Bouchoucha I. Understanding participant’s behaviour in massively open online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learning. 2019;20(1). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential skills for a medical teacher: an introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. Elsevier Health Sciences: 2020. doi: 10.33029/9704-5958-4-2021-KLN-1-376
   Google Scholar
• Jia M, Gong D, Luo J, et al. Who can benefit more from massive open online courses? A prospective cohort study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;76:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, et al. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):910–917. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a858ad
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):787–791. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.684916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albarello L. Choisir l’étude de cas comme méthode de recherche. In: De Boeck, editor. Méthodes en sciences humaines. De Boeck; 2011. p. 144.
   Google Scholar
• Norman G, Norcini J, Bordage G. Competency-based education: milestones or millstones? J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(1):1–6. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00445.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar