1,381
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Moving beyond the formal: developing significant networks and conversations in higher education: reflections from an interdisciplinary European project team

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1075-1091 | Received 06 Aug 2021, Accepted 14 Mar 2022, Published online: 05 Apr 2022

References

  • Aboelela, Larson E, S. Bakken, O. Carrasquillo, A. Formicola, S. A. Glied, J. Haas, and K. M. Gebbie. 2007. “Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature.” Health Services Research 42 (1): 329–346. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x.
  • Baiduc, R., R. A. Linsenmeier, and N. Ruggeri. 2016. “Mentored Discussions of Teaching: An Introductory Teaching Development Program for Future STEM Faculty.” Innovative Higher Education 41 (3): 237–255. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9348-1.
  • Beauchamp, G., M. Hulme, L. Clarke, L. Hamilton, and J. A. Harvey. 2021. “‘People Miss People’: A Study of School Leadership and Management in the Four Nations of the United Kingdom in the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 49 (3): 375–392. doi:10.1177/1741143220987841.
  • Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Boud, D., and A. Brew. 2013. “Reconceptualising Academic Work as Professional Practice: Implications for Academic Development.” International Journal for Academic Development 18 (3): 208–221. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2012.671771.
  • Boyce, B. A., J. L. Lund, G. Napper-Owen, and D. Almarode. 2019. “‘Doctoral Students’ Perspectives on Their Training as Teachers in Higher Education.’.” Quest 71 (3): 289–298. doi:10.1080/00336297.2019.1618065.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019. “‘Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
  • Braun, V., V. Clarke, and N. Hayfield. 2019. “‘A Starting Point for Your Journey, Not a Map’: Nikki Hayfield in Conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke About Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–22. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765.
  • Castleberry, A., and A. Nolen. 2018. “Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Research Data: Is It as Easy as It Sounds?” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 10 (6): 807–815. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019.
  • Chang, H., F. Ngunjiri, and K. C. Hernandez. 2012. Collaborative Autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Taylor & Francis.
  • Côté, L., and J. Turgeon. 2005. “Appraising Qualitative Research Articles in Medicine and Medical Education.” Medical Teacher 27: 71–75. doi:10.1080/01421590400016308.
  • Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Dolan, A. M. 2016. “Place-based Curriculum Making: Devising a Synthesis Between Primary Geography and Outdoor Learning.” Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning 16 (1): 49–62. doi:10.1080/14729679.2015.1051563.
  • Englund, C., A. D. Olofsson, and L. Price. 2017. “Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Understanding Conceptual Change and Development in Practice.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300.
  • Eraut, M. 2004. “Informal Learning in the Workplace.” Studies in Continuing Education 26 (2): 247–273. doi:10.1080/158037042000225245.
  • Fettes, M., and G. Judson. 2010. “Imagination and the Cognitive Tools of Place-Making.” The Journal of Environmental Education 42 (2): 123–135. doi:10.1080/00958964.2010.505967.
  • Fielding, N., M. L. Raymond, and G. Blank. 2016. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
  • Gibbs, G. 2013. “Reflections on the Changing Nature of Educational Development.” International Journal for Academic Development 18 (1): 4–14. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691.
  • Gibbs, G., C. Knapper, and S. Piccini. 2007. “The Role of Departmental Leadership in Fostering Excellent Teaching.” In Practice 13: 1–4. doi:10.1177/0013161X17718023.
  • Goffman, E. 2000. Jaget och Maskerna [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. Stockholm: Prisma.
  • Greenspan, S., L. Kelsey, S. Gordon, A. Whitcomb, and A. Lauterbach. 2021. “Use of Video Conferencing to Facilitate Focus Groups for Qualitative Data Collection.” American Journal of Qualitative Research 5 (1): 85–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/10813.
  • Greenwald, A. G., A. R. Pratkanis, M. R. Leippe, and M. H. Baumgardner. 1986. “Under What Conditions Does Theory Obstruct Research Progress?” Psychological Review 93 (2): 216–229. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.216.
  • Hawkins, M. R. 2014. “Ontologies of Place, Creative Meaning Making and Critical Cosmopolitan Education.” Curriculum Inquiry 44 (1): 90–112. doi:10.1111/curi.12036.
  • Hood, N., and A. Littlejohn. 2017. “‘Knowledge Typologies for Professional Learning: Educators’ (Re)generation of Knowledge When Learning Open Educational Practice.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65 (6): 1583–1604. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9536-z.
  • Huutoniemi, Klein J. T., H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2010. “Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators.” Research Policy 39 (1): 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.
  • Jenner, B., and K. Myers. 2019. “Intimacy, Rapport, and Exceptional Disclosure: A Comparison of in-Person and Mediated Interview Contexts.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22 (2): 165–177. doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1512694.
  • Jones, A. 2008. “Preparing new Faculty Members for Their Teaching Role.” New Directions for Higher Education 2008 (143): 93–101. doi:10.1002/he.317.
  • Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.929293.
  • Koseoglu, S., and A. Bozkurt. 2018. “An Exploratory Literature Review on Open Educational Practices.” Distance Education 39 (4): 441–461. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042.
  • Land, R. 2001. “Agency, Context and Change in Academic Development.” International Journal for Academic Development 6 (1): 4–20. doi:10.1080/13601440110033715.
  • Lapadat, J. C. 2017. “Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography.” Qualitative Inquiry 23 (8): 589–603. doi:10.1177/1077800417704462.
  • Mamede, S., T. van Gog, K. van den Berge, R. Rikers, J. van Saase, C. van Guldener, and H. Schmidt. 2010. “Effect of Availability Bias and Reflective Reasoning on Diagnostic Accuracy Among Internal Medicine Residents.” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 304 (11): 1198–1203. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1276.
  • Masterman, E. 2016. “Bringing Open Educational Practice to a Research-Intensive University: Prospects and Challenges.” Electronic Journal of E-Learning 14 (1): 31–43.
  • Merriam, S. 1988. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1984. “Drawing Valid Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft.” Educational Researcher 13 (5): 20–30. doi:10.2307/1174243.
  • Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nowell, L. S., J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16: 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
  • Oliveira, G., J. Grenha Teixeira, A. Torres, and C. Morais. 2021. “An Exploratory Study on the Emergency Remote Education Experience of Higher Education Students and Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” British Journal of Educational Technology 52 (4): 1357–1376. doi:10.1111/bjet.13112.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2003. “Expanding the Framework of Internal and External Validity in Quantitative Research.” Research in the Schools 10 (1): 71–89.
  • Palmer, P. J. 1993. “Good Talk About Good Teaching – Improving Teaching Through Conversation and Community.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 25 (6): 8–13. doi:10.1080/00091383.1993.9938466.
  • Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pekkarinen, V., L. Hirsto, and A. Nevgi. 2020. “The Ideal and the Experienced: University Teachers’ Perceptions of a Good University Teacher and Their Experienced Pedagogical Competency.” International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education 32 (1): 13–30.
  • Pierce, J., D. G. Martin, and J. T. Murphy. 2011. “Relational Place-Making: The Networked Politics of Place.” Transactions - Institute of British Geographers 36 (1): 54–70. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00411.x.
  • Poole, G., I. Iqbal, and R. Verwoord. 2019. “Small Significant Networks as Birds of a Feather.” International Journal for Academic Development 24 (1): 61–72. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2018.1492924.
  • Rice, P. L., and D. Ezzy. 1999. Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Rosser, V. J. 2003. “Preparing and Socializing New Faculty Members.” Review of Higher Education 26 (3): 387–395. doi:10.1353/rhe.2003.0004.
  • Roxå, T., and K. Mårtensson. 2009. “Significant Conversations and Significant Networks – Exploring the Backstage of the Teaching Arena.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (5): 547–559. doi:10.1080/03075070802597200.
  • Roxå, T., K. Mårtensson, and M. Alveteg. 2011. “Understanding and Influencing Teaching and Learning Cultures at University: A Network Approach.” Higher Education 62 (1): 99–111. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9368-9.
  • Smith, R. 1995. “Reflecting Critically on Our Efforts to Improve Teaching and Learning.” In To Improve the Academy, edited by E. Neal, 5–25. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
  • Steinert, Y. 2010. “Faculty Development: From Workshops to Communities of Practice.” Medical Teacher 32 (5): 425–428. doi:10.3109/01421591003677897.
  • Stewart, D. W., and P. Shamdasani. 2017. “Online Focus Groups.” Journal of Advertising: Themed Issue - Methodology in Advertising Research 46 (1): 48–60. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288.
  • Sugrue, C., T. Englund, T. Drydal Solbrekke, and T. Fossland. 2017. “Trends in the Practices of Academic Developers: Trajectories of Higher Education?” Studies in Higher Education 43 (12): 2336–2353. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1326026.
  • Sutherland, K. 2018. “Holistic Academic Development: Is It Time to Think More Broadly About the Academic Development Project?” International Journal for Academic Development 23 (4): 261–273. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2018.1524571.
  • Thomson, K. 2015. “Informal Conversations About Teaching and Their Relationship to a Formal Development Program: Learning Opportunities for Novice and Midcareer Academics.” International Journal for Academic Development 20 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1028066.
  • Thomson, K., and K. Trigwell. 2018. “The Role of Informal Conversations in Developing University Teaching?” Studies in Higher Education 43 (9): 1536–1547. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1265498.
  • Tillinghast, B. 2020. “Developing an Open Educational Resource and Exploring OER-Enabled Pedagogy in Higher Education.” IAFOR Journal of Education 8 (2): 159–174. doi:10.22492/ije.8.2.09.
  • Trigwell, K., K. Caballero-Rodriguez, and F. Han. 2012. “Assessing the Impact of a University Teaching Development Programme.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (4): 499–511. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.547929.
  • Wells, P., K. N. Dickens, J. S. McBraer, and R. E. Cleveland. 2019. “‘If I Don’t Laugh, I’m Going to cry’: Meaning Making in the Promotion, Tenure, and Retention Process: A Collaborative Autoethnography.” Qualitative Report 24 (2): 334–351.
  • Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wenger, E. 2000. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” Organization 7 (2): 225–246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
  • Woodyatt, C. R., C. A. Finneran, and R. Stephenson. 2016. “In-Person Versus Online Focus Group Discussions: A Comparative Analysis of Data Quality.” Qualitative Health Research 26 (6): 741–749. doi:10.1177/1049732316631510.