Anchoring ocean literacy: participatory iBook design within secondary science classrooms

References

• Alberizzi, V. L. (2013). iBooks in the classroom: Creating digital tools for learning Italian in a Japanese university. In Pixel (Ed.), Conference proceedings. ICT for language learning ( 6th ed., pp. 198–201). Florence, Italy. Limena: Libreriauniversitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Alghamdi, A. H., & Li, L. (2013). Adapting design-based research as a research methodology in educational settings. International Journal of Education and Research, 1, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmawi, A., Mariani Md Nor, E. D., & Farid, F. D. (2015, July). Creating interactive iBook for academic writing among undergraduate students at a Malaysian university. Paper presented at First Asia Pacific Conference on Advanced Research, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Methodology and methods in mathematics education (pp. 429–466). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, A. A. (2015). Developing an interactive textbook using iBooks author. Federation of Business Disciplines Journal, 3, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 153–170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, N. C. (2002). Foundations in qualitative methods. In C. Barker, N. Pistrang, & R. Elliott (Eds.), Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners (pp. 5–72). Chichester: Wiley London.
   Google Scholar
• Baughman, M., Pearson, M., Ehmann, M., & Vilcheck, A. (2013). The effects of iBooks biology on student science achievement and motivation. Pearson, Always Learning, 10. Retrieved from https://assets.pearsonschool.com/asset_mgr/current/201423/iBookBiologyWhitePapers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. (2004). On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39, 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belveal, L. K. (2016). No Nā Hale: Developing an interactive iBook to promote learning for the Hawaiian immersion lower elementary classroom. LTEC 690 Spring 2016. Retrieved from Scholar Space website: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/40216
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5, 235–245.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2012). Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges. Design Issues, 28, 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2013). Framing ICT-enabled innovation for learning: The case of one-to-one learning initiatives in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48, 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2014). Thematic analysis. In P. Rohleder & C. L. Antonia (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical health & psychology (pp. 95–114). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, F., Thomas, N., & Ware, M. (2013, July). The development of an interactive iBook application to harness the next generation of ‘computer architecture’ educational experiences. Paper presented at the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS), Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Liang, C., & Yan, C.-F. (2013). The influence of perceived convenience and curiosity on continuance intention in mobile English learning for high school students using PDAs. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22, 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26, 120–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Comiskey, D., McCartan, K., & Nicholl, P. (2013, October–November). iBuilding for success? iBooks as open educational resources in built environment education. Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on e-Learning ECEL-2013, Sophia Antopolis, France.
   Google Scholar
• Connaway, L. S., White, D., & Lanclos, D. (2011). Visitors and residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2012). Context-dependent control over attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 836–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2005). Why design-based research is both important and difficult. Educational Technology, 45, 5–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429182
   Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., & Hao, S. (2014). Intentionally mobile pedagogy: The M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23, 397–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco‐Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40, 314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encheff, D. (2013). Creating a science e-book with fifth grade students. TechTrends, 57(6), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fauville, G., Dupont, S., von Thun, S., & Lundin, J. (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 60–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. (2012). Use of tablet technology in the classroom. NSW Department of Education and Communities. Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia: NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, H., Lotze, H. K., & Wallace, D. (2015). Youth and the sea: Ocean literacy in Nova Scotia, Canada. Marine Policy, 58, 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, I., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & ten Dam, G. (2012). Inclusiveness of ICT in secondary education: Students’ appreciation of ICT tools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16, 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. M. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, J. W., & Anderson, A. (2013). iPad integration in an elementary classroom: Lesson ideas, successes, and challenges. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Pedagogical applications and social effects of mobile technology integration (pp. 42–54). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2985-1.ch003
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, S., Norton, D., & Corless, R. (2014). Investigating societal attitudes towards the marine environment of Ireland. Marine Policy, 47, 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). doi:10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, N., & Marsh, S. (2014). Using iBooks and iPad apps to embed information literacy into an EFL foundations course. New Library World, 115, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H. (2013). Apple’s iBooks author: Potential, pedagogical meanings, and implementation challenges. In Z. Yang, H. H. Yang, D. Wu, & S. Liu (Eds.), Transforming K–12 classrooms with digital technology (pp. 119–139). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4538-7.ch007
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E. J., Taylor, M., Monteiro, A. K., Romney, W., Scipio, M., Diaz, A., … Poole, S. (2015). Making the leap to teacher: Pre-service residents, faculty, and school mentors taking on action research together in an urban teacher residency program. Networks, 17(1). doi:10.4148/2470-6353.1034
   Google Scholar
• Klieger, A., Ben-Hur, Y., & Bar-Yossef, N. (2010). Integrating laptop computers into classroom: Attitudes, needs, and professional development of science teachers – A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W., & Hong, H.-Y. (2015). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 535–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortland, K., & Klaassen, K. (2010). Designing theory-based teaching-learning sequences for science education. Utrecht: CDBeta Press – Fisme, Utrecht University. Retrieved from www.staff.science.uu.nl/~kortl101/book_sympPL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, M. (2014, February). eBooks as pdf files, in epub format or as interactive ibooks? Digital books in physics lessons of secondary education. Paper presented at 10th International Conference Mobile Learning, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Maich, K., & Hall, C. (2015). Implementing iPads in the inclusive classroom setting. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51, 145–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markos, A., Boubonari, T., Mogias, A., & Kevrekidis, T. (2015). Measuring ocean literacy in pre-service teachers: Psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Survey of Ocean Literacy and Experience (SOLE). Environmental Education Research, 1–21. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1126807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, C., Gorell, F., & Keener-Chavis, P. (2005, September). Reaching out in new ways: Working with alternative schools and underrepresented groups to improve ocean literacy through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Ocean Exploration. Paper presented at the OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, V., & Davison, K. (2015, Winter). Micro and macro pedagogy for science education. Chemistry in Action!, 2016(106), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319–342.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D., & Sarles, P. (2012). Exit tickets: The reflective ticket to understanding. Library Media Connection, 31(3), 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2004). Research report: Situational interest and the attitudes towards science of primary teacher education students. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 895–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, K. F., Goodson, A. M., Tahim, A., Wharrad, H. J., & Fan, K. (2012). Using the iBook in medical education and healthcare settings - the iBook as a reusable learning object: A report of the author’s experience using iBooks Author software. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 35, 162–169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plankis, B. J., & Marrero, M. E. (2010). Recent ocean literacy research in United States public schools: Results and implications. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1, 21–51.
   Google Scholar
• Raine, R. (2017). Harmful Algal Blooms. Retrieved from Apple Books website: https://books.apple.com/us/book/harmful-algal-blooms/id1214392876
   Google Scholar
• Roe, S. (2011). Report of a consultation with young people on reform of the junior cycle. Dublin: Government Publications. Retrieved from https://researchmatters.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ReportconsultationwithyoungpeopleonreformoftheJuniorCycle.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21, 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Aualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16, 738–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Savenye, W. C., & Robinson, R. S. (1996). Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1045–1071). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schubel, J. R., & Schubel, K. A. (2008, September). From ocean issues to solutions: The role of public ocean literacy. Paper presented at the OCEANS 2008 meeting, Quebec City.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G., & Despotakis, T. (2009). Computer based testing using ‘digital ink’: Participatory design of a Tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education. Computers & Education, 52, 811–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofaer, S. (2002). Qualitative research methods. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14, 329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. J. (1999). Designing surveys that work! A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, L. U., Payne, D. L., & Whitley, L. (2010). Research on learning and teaching ocean and aquatic sciences. NMEA Special Report, 3, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WellcomeTrust. (2011). Educational research. Exploring young people’s views on science education. Retrieved from https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtvm052732_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• White, D. S., & Le Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). doi:10.5210/fm.v16i9.3171
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, E. C., Lyon, C. J., & Goe, L. (2009). Teacher professional development focused on formative assessment: Changing teachers, changing schools. ETS Research Report Series, 2009(1), i–32.
   Google Scholar