200
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of realistic mathematics education on secondary school students’ problem-solving skills: a comparative evaluation study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmed, A., & Pollitt, A. (2011). Improving marking quality through a taxonomy of mark schemes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.546775
  • Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
  • Arzarello, F., Garuti, R., & Ricci, R. (2015). The impact of PISA studies on the Italian national assessment system. In K. Stacey, & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy (pp. 249–260). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_13
  • Australian Council for Educational Research, cApStAn Linguistic Quality Control, Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung, Educational Testing Service, Institutt for Lærerutdanning og Skoleutvikling, Leibniz - Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, National Institute for Educational Policy Research, The Tao Initiative: CRP - Henri Tudor and Université de Luxembourg - EMACS, Unité d’ analyse des systèmes et des pratiques d’ enseignement, & Westat. (2013). PISA 2012 released mathematics items. OECD Publishing.
  • Beglinger, L. J., Gaydos, B., Tangphao-Daniels, O., Duff, K., Kareken, D. A., Crawford, J., Fastenau, P. S., & Siemers, E. R. (2005). Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.12.003
  • Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects — state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302716
  • Bokhove, C., & Jones, K. (2018). Stimulating mathematical creativity through constraints in problem-solving. In N. Amado, S. Carreira, & K. Jones (Εds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving: A focus on technology, creativity and affect (pp. 301-319). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99861-9_13
  • Bokhove, C., Miyazaki, M., Komatsu, K., Chino, K., Leung, A., & Mok, I. A. C. (2019). The role of “opportunity to learn” in the geometry curriculum: A multilevel comparison of six countries. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00063
  • Bostic, J. D., Pape, S. J., & Jacobbe, T. (2016). Encouraging sixth-grade students’ problem-solving performance by teaching through problem solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 8(3), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2016.11790353
  • Briggs, N. (2019). Analysis of pretest-posttest data: It’s not as straightforward as you might think!. Stats Central.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Cai, J. (2003). Investigating parental roles in students’ learning of mathematics from a cross-national perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217372
  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (2009). Common core state standards for mathematics. Common Core Standards Initiative.
  • Demack, S., Culliney, M., Boylan, M., & Wolstenholme, C. (2022). Realistic maths education: Evaluation report. Education Endowment Foundation.
  • Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
  • Doerr, H. M., & Lesh, R. (2011). Models and modelling perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics in the twenty-first century. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 247–268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_26
  • Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Dekker, T., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., de Lange, J., & Wijers, M. (2007). Problem solving as a challenge for mathematics education in The Netherlands. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 39(5-6), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0043-2
  • Ellison, J. G. (2009). Increasing problem solving skills in fifth grade advanced mathematics students. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 3(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2009.v3n1p15
  • English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking New Frontiers, 1, 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_27
  • Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
  • Fowler, K., Windschitl, M., & Richards, J. (2019). Exit tickets. The Science Teacher, 86(8), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2019.12293416
  • Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies, 13(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.13.2.185891
  • Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2019). Development of learning materials based on realistic mathematics education to improve problem solving ability and student learning independence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/4000
  • Hirza, B., Kusumah, Y. S., Darhim, D., & Zulkardi, Z. (2014). Improving intuition skills with realistic mathematics education. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 27–34.
  • Hoosain, E. (2004). What are mathematical problems? Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 1(27), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.5642/hmnj.200401.27.12
  • Ingram, J., & Riser, P. A. (2019). Experiences of problem solving in whole class interactions. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 16(16), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i16.279
  • Institute of Educational Policy. (2019). Θέματα Μαθηματικών PISA. [PISA Mathematics Assessment Items]. Retrieved August 24, 2023, from http://www.iep.edu.gr/pisa/index.php/examples/themata-mathimatikon
  • Kantowski, M. G. (1997). Processes involved in mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/748518
  • Kaur, B. (2021). A look at Singapore mathematics Singapore mathematics education through the PISA and TIMSS lenses. In O. S. Tan, E. L. Low, E. G. Tay, & Y. K. Yan (Eds.), Singapore math and science education innovation: Beyond PISA (pp. 61–73). Springer.
  • Kim, A., & Lim, E. Y. (1999, April 19-23). How Critical Is Back Translation in Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Attitude Measures? [Paper presented]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED430014
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  • Kirzner, R. S., Alter, T., & Hughes, C. A. (2021). Online quiz as exit ticket: Using technology to reinforce learning in face to face classes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 41(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2021.1898521
  • Koichu, B. (2019). A discursively oriented conceptualization of mathematical problem solving. In P. Felmer, P. Liljedahl, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Problem solving in mathematics instruction and teacher professional development (pp. 43–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29215-7_3
  • Koichu, B., Parasha, R., & Tabach, M. (2021). Who-Is-Right tasks as a means for supporting collective looking-back practices. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53, 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01264-z
  • Kosheleva, O., & Villaverde, K. (2018). Spiral curriculum: Towards mathematical foundations. In How interval and fuzzy techniques can improve teaching: Processing educational data: From traditional statistical techniques to an appropriate combination of probabilistic, interval, and fuzzy approaches (Vol 750, pp. 135–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55993-2_15
  • Koutrouba, K. (2012). A profile of the effective teacher: Greek secondary education teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.654332
  • Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
  • Krkovic, K., Mustafic, M., Wüstenberg, S., & Greiff, S. (2018). Shifts in the assessment of problem solving. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 51–73). Springer.
  • Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2-3), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2003.9679998
  • Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modelling. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Information Age Publishing.
  • Lester, F. K., & Kehle, P. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 501–517). Routledge.
  • Lester Jr, F. K. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1267
  • Lind Pantzare, A. (2015). Interrater reliability in large-scale assessments–Can teachers score national tests reliably without external controls? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.7275/y2en-zm89
  • Mavrikaki, E., Koumparou, H., Kyriakoudi, M., Papacharalampous, I., & Trimandili, M. (2012). Greek secondary school students’ views about biology. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2), 217–232.
  • McDermott, R. (2011). Internal and external validity. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Greene, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Εds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 27–40). Cambridge University Press.
  • Mikroni, E., Zacharos, K., & Komis, V. (2007). Απο τα ρϵαλιστικά πλαίσια στα μαθηματικά μοντέλα. Η πϵρίπτωση των γραμμικών συναρτήσϵων στην Α’ Λυκϵίου. [From realistic contexts to mathematical models: The case of linear functions in 1st year of Lyceum]. Research in Mathematics Education, 1, 40–62. https://doi.org/10.12681/enedim.18763
  • Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059
  • Nolka, E., & Sofianopoulou, C. (2021). Greek and Portuguese mathematics education and performance, through the prism of PISA. In M. Carmo (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference on education and new developments (pp. 116–120). inScience Press. https://doi.org/10.36315/2021end025.
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (Volume V). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-en
  • OECD. (2018). PISA 2022 mathematics framework draft. OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2023a). Education GPS: Greece student performance (PISA 2018). Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=GRC&treshold=10&topic=PI
  • OECD. (2023b). Mathematics performance (PISA) (indicator). Retrieved August 24, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1787/04711c74-en
  • Özkaya, A., & Yetim, K. (2017). The effects of Realistic Mathematics Education on students’ achievements and attitudes in fifth grades mathematics courses. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(2), 185–197.
  • Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with realistic mathematical education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0768-4
  • Papadopoulos, I., & Ventistas, G. (2023). Collaborative geometry problem solving in secondary education: The issue of control strategies. In P. Drijvers, C. Csapodi, H. Palmér, K. Gosztonyi, & E. Kónya (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13) (pp. 781-788). Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics and ERME.
  • Penny, J., Johnson, R. L., & Gordon, B. (2000). The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability: An empirical study of a holistic rubric. Assessing Writing, 7(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00012-X
  • Pólya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (expanded Princeton science library). Princeton University Press.
  • R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rubin, M. (2021). When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: A consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing. Synthese, 199(3-4), 10969–11000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03276-4
  • Russo, J., Minas, M., Hewish, T., & McCosh, J. (2020). Using prompts to empower learners: Exploring primary students’ attitudes towards enabling prompts when learning mathematics through problem solving. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 22(1), 48–67.
  • Safrudiannur, S., & Rott, B. (2019). The different mathematics performances in PISA 2012 and a curricula comparison: Enriching the comparison by an analysis of the role of problem solving in intended learning processes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0248-4
  • Schoenfeld, H. A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press, Inc.
  • Selmer, S., & Kale, U. (2013). Teaching mathematics through problem solving. Innovación Educativa, 13(62), 45–59.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Siddiqui, N., & Ventista, O. M. (2018). A review of school-based interventions for the improvement of social emotional skills and wider outcomes of education. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.06.003
  • Sjøberg, S., & Jenkins, E. (2022). PISA: A political project and a research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 58(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1824473
  • Slavin, R. E., & Smith, D. (2008). Effects of sample size on effect size in systematic reviews in education [Paper presentation]. Society for Research on Effective Education annual meeting, Crystal City, Virginia, United States of America.
  • Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.7275/96jp-xz07
  • Su, C. T., & Parham, L. D. (2002). Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.581
  • Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
  • Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
  • Tienken, C. H. (2010). Common core state standards: I wonder? Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2010.10516554
  • Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., & Thanh, L. N. P. (2021). The effectiveness of applying realistic mathematics education approach in teaching statistics in grade 7 to students’ mathematical skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.185.197
  • Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. Utrecht University Repository. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/1705
  • Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 713–717). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
  • Ventista, Ο. Μ. (2018). A literature review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness of philosophy for children. In E. Duthie, F. G. Moriyón, & R. Robles Loro (Eds.), Family resemblances: Current trends in philosophy for children (pp. 448–469). Anaya.
  • Ventista, O. M. (2021). How to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based intervention: Evaluating the impact of the philosophy for children programme on students’ skills. Emerald.
  • Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), Article 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
  • Wu, M. (2004). The impact of PISA in mathematics education: Linking mathematics and the real world. Education Journal, 32(1), 121–140.
  • Wu, M. (2006). A comparison of mathematics performance between East and West: What PISA and TIMSS can tell Us. In F. K. S. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions-A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 239–259). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29723-5_15
  • Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of realistic mathematics education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLoS ONE, 13(9), Article e0204847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847
  • Zakaria, E., & Syamaun, M. (2017). The effect of realistic mathematics education approach on students’ achievement and attitudes towards mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.5899/2017/metr-00093
  • Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.