References
- Chan, J., & Nankervis, K. (2015), Stolen voices: Facilitated communication is an abuse of human rights. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention.
- International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. (2014). ISAAC Position Statement on Facilitated Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 357–358.
- Lang, R., Harbison Tostanoski, A., Travers, J., & Todd, J. (2014). The only study investigating the rapid prompting method has serious methodological flaws but data suggest the most likely outcome is prompt dependency. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment & Intervention, 8, 40–48.
- Lilienfeld, S., Marshall, J., Todd, T., James, S., & Howard, C. (2015). The persistence of fad interventions in the face of Negative Scientific Evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention.
- Sagan, C. (1980). Encyclopaedia Galactica [Television series episode]. In Cosmos: A Personal Voyage. Los Angeles: PBS.
- Schlosser, R. W., Balandin, S., Hemsley, B., Iacono, T., Probst, P., & von Tetzchner, S. (2014). Facilitated communication and authorship: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 359–368.10.3109/07434618.2014.971490
- Stubblefield, A. (2011). Sound and fury: When opposition to facilitated communication functions as hate speech. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31, 32–43.
- Tostanoski, A., Lang, R., Raulston, T., Carnett, A., & Davis, T. (2014). Voices from the past: Comparing the rapid prompting method and facilitated communication. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 219–223.10.3109/17518423.2012.749952