A systematic review investigating outcome measures and uptake barriers when children and youth with complex disabilities use eye gaze assistive technology

References

• Karlsson P, Allsop A, Dee-Price BJ, Wallen M. Eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy with significant physical disability: findings from a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017:1–9. doi:10.1080/17518423.2017.1362057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Virgo R, Olsson C, Connell T, Lane AE. Activity participation of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities and typically-developing peers. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;4(3):145–55. doi:10.3109/17518423.2011.568994.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Olsson C, Sampson J, Mcinerney R, Connell T. School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentat Alternat Commun. 2012;28(1):33–43. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodwin MG, Cardoso E, Star T. Computer assistive technology for people who have disabilities: computer adaptations and modifications. J Rehabil. 2004;70:28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majaranta P, Ed.. Gaze interaction and applications of eye tracking: advances in assistive technologies: advances in assistive technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle M, Phillips B. Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentat Alternat Commun. 2001;17(3):167–78. doi:10.1080/aac.17.3.167.178.
   Google Scholar
• Curry H, Woodward S, Forster C, Caryer K, Barker J, Mcintyre F, Bell H. Using an eye-gaze system with two primary school pupils with severe accessing difficulties. Commun Matt. 2007;21:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Van Middendorp JJ, Watkins F, Park C, Landymore H. Eye-tracking computer systems for inpatients with tetraplegia: findings from a feasibility study. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(3):221–25. doi:10.1038/sc.2014.219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Hemmingsson H. The benefits of gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities for children with disabilities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:1082–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 4th edn. Maryland, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:125–31.
   Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology-A longitudinal study. Assist Technol. 2016;28(2):93–102. doi:10.1080/10400435.2015.1092182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang CS, Weng HH, Wang LF, Tsai CH, Chang HT. An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers’ burden. J Mot Behav. 2014;46(4):233–38. doi:10.1080/00222895.2014.891970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy BR, Boa S, Enderby P Testing the reliability and validity of the Therapy Outcome Measure for AAC; 2017. Available at http://www.talkingmats.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/TOMAAC-Final-report-Oct-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Int Class. 2002;1149:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, Sigafoos J, Boccasini A, La Martire M, Perilli V, Spagnuolo C. Technology to support positive occupational engagement and communication in persons with multiple disabilities. Int J Disability Hum Dev. 2016;15(1):111–16. doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0023.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:7. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson S, Gallo G. Utah State board of education special education rules state superintendent of public instruction. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: Utah State Board of Education; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education. Special education across Europe in 2003 Middelfart Denmark. 2003 Retrieved from https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/special-education-across-europe-in-2003_special_education_europe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ontario. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 306: special education programs and services. 2016. Retrieved April 19, 2018, from https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900306
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Critical review form quantitative studies. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Guidlines for critical review form. 1998. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments-an intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):129–41. doi:10.3109/17518423.2015.1132281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhas BN, Samuel PS, Manigandan C. Use of computer access technology as an alternative to writing for a pre-school child with athetoid cerebral palsy—a case report. Occup Therapy Health Care. 2014;28(3):318–32. doi:10.3109/07380577.2013.874063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornof AJ, Cavender A EyeDraw: enabling children with severe motor impairments to draw with their eyes. CHI 2005: Technology, Safety, Community: Conference Proceedings - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA. 2005:161–70.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson P, Wallen M. Parent perception of two eye-gaze control technology systems in young children with cerebral palsy: pilot study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:1095–102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Man DWK, Wong M-SL. Evaluation of computer-access solutions for students with quadriplegic athetoid cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Therapy. 2007;61:355–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto M, Shimada Y, Yasuhiro MAKI, Shibasato K Development of eye gaze software for children with physical disabilities. In Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory And Application (ICAICTA), 2016 International Conference IEEE, Penang, Malaysia. 2016; 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi L, Friday M, Robertson Z. Two case studies describing assessment and provision of eye gaze assistive technology for people with severe physical disabilities. J Assist Technol. 2008;2(2):6–12. doi:10.1108/17549450200800013.
   Google Scholar
• Thoumie P, Charlier JR, Alecki M, d‘Erceville D, Heurtin A, Jf M, Nadeau G, Wiart L. Clinical and functional evaluation of a gaze controlled system for the severely handicapped. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(2):104–09. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk K, Tonsing K. Eye gaze assistive technology: a South African perspective. Disability Rehabil-Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):340–46. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.974222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers S, Istance H, Hyrskykari A. Performing locomotion tasks in immersive computer games with an adapted eye-tracking interface. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2013;5:1. doi:10.1145/2514856.
   Google Scholar
• Burns P, Rohrich R, Chung K. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305–10. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan S, Kratochwill T, Lipscomb S. What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Standards for Evaluating Single Case Designs (SCDs). Evanston, IL: Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF browser. n.d. Available at: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/
   Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Björck-Åkessön E, Lollar DJ. (2012). Communication, disability. Augment Alternat Commun. 2012;28(1):3–10. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerharz EW, Eiser C, Woodhouse CRJ. Current approaches to assessing the quality of life in children and adolescents. Br J Urol. 2003;91(2):150–54. doi:10.1046/j.1464-4096.2003.04001.x.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50(2):132. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandak K, O’Neill T, Light J, Fosco GM. Bridging the gap from values to actions: a family systems framework for family-centered AAC services. Augmentat Alternat Commun. 2017;33(1):32–41. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1271453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen M, Stewart K. The GAS approach: scaling tailored goals. In: Poulsen A, Ziviani J, Cuskelly M, editors. Goal Setting and Motivation in Therapy: Engaging Children and Parents. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2015;153-162.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser RW, Wendt O, Sigafoos J. Not all systematic reviews are created equal: considerations for appraisal. Evid Based Commun Assess Interv. 2007;1(3):138–50. doi:10.1080/17489530701560831.
   Google Scholar
• Ball LJ, Nordness AS, Fager SK, Kersch K, Mohr B, Pattee GL, Beukelman DR. Eye-gaze access to AAC technology for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;18:11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligari M, Godi M, Guglielmetti S, Franchignoni F, Nardone A. Eye tracking communication devices in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: impact on disability and quality of life. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Frontotemporal Degener. 2013;14(7–8):546–52. doi:10.3109/21678421.2013.803576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Ahlsten G, Wandin H, Rytterström P, Borgestig M. Eye-gaze control technology as early intervention for a non-verbal young child with high spinal cord injury: a case report. Technologies. 2018;6(1):12. doi:10.3390/technologies6010012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson TD. The proper protocol: validity and completeness of verbal reports. Psychol Sci. 1994;5(5):249–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00621.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder S, Ward R, Jones M, Johnston J, Claessen M. The uses of outcome measures within multidisciplinary early childhood intervention services: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017:1–24. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1353144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzel EE, Thoma CA. Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Dev Excep Individ. 2008;31(2):77–84. doi:10.1177/0885728808317658.
   Google Scholar
• Perfect, E., Jaiswal, A., & Davies, T. C. Systematic review: Investigating the effectiveness of assistive technology to enable internet access for individuals with deafblindness. Assistive Technology. 2018;1–10.
   Google Scholar