Therapists’ perspectives: supporting children to use switches and technology for accessing their environment, leisure, and communication

References

• Andersen, G., Mjøen, T. R., & Vik, T. (2010). Prevalence of speech problems and the use of augmentative and alternative communication in children with cerebral palsy: A registry- based study in Norway. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 12–20. doi:10.1044/aac19.1.12
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R, & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, USA: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke-Taylor, H., Cotter, C., & Stephan, R. (2013). Young children with cerebral palsy: Families self reported equipment needs and out of pocket expenditure. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(5), 654–662. 10.1111/cch.12098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke-Taylor, H.M., Cotter, C., Stephan, R. (2014). Young children with cerebral palsy: Families self reported equipment needs and out of pocket expenditure. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40 (5), 654–662. 10.1111/cch.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke-Taylor, H. M., Cotter, C., Johnson, L., & Lalor, A. (2018). Belonging, school support and communication: Essential aspects of school success for students with cerebral palsy in mainstream schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, (Early View). doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke-Taylor, H. M., Cotter, C., Lalor, A., & Johnson, L. (2018). School success and participation for students with cerebral palsy: A qualitative study exploring multiple perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation, (Early view). doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1327988
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart, L., Gardner-Fox, D., & Hanser, G. (2004). Two switches for success: Access for children with severe physical and/or multiple challenges. Retrieved from http://www.lburkhart.com/switch_handout_3_12_Burkhart.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P., Milbourne, S., Dungan, L., & Wilcox, M. (2006). A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 3–13. doi:10.1177/02711214060260010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantry, J., & Dunford, C. (2010). How do computer assistive technologies enhance participation in childhood occupations for children with multiple and complex disabilities? A review of the current literature. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(8), 351–365. doi:10.4276/030802210X12813483277107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A., & Polgar, J. M. (2008). Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies principles and practice (10th ed.). St. Louis, USA: Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2005). Assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities in educational settings. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(12), 559–566. doi:10.1177/030802260506801205
   Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2010). The effect of seated position on access to augmentative communication for children with cerebral palsy: Preliminary investigation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 596–604. doi:10.5014/ajot.2010.09013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, A. C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rosbald, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Ohrvall, A., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The manual ability classification system (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 549–554. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication., 23(3), 243–257. doi:10.1080/07434610701571058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isabelle, S., Bessey, S., Dragas, K., Blease, P., Shepherd, J., & Lane, S. (2002). Assistive technology for children with disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 16(4), 29–51. doi:10.1080/J003v16n04_03
   Google Scholar
• Leung, B., Brian, J. A., & Chau, T. (2013). Learning and mastery behaviours as risk factors to abandonment in a paediatric user of advanced single-switch access technology. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 8(5), 426–433. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.754955
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung, B., & Chau, T. (2014). Autonomic responses to correct outcomes and interaction errors during single-switch scanning among children with severe spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11(34), e1–13. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275126
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2002). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alterntive Communication., 23(3), 204–216. doi:10.1080/07434610701553635
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alterntive Communication, 23 (3), 204–216.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellot, S., Millar, D., Parrish, C… Welliver, M. (2004). Performance of typically developing four and five year-old chidlren with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20 (2), 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communication competence for individual who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., Sullivan, G., Greenwood, K., & Axford, R. (2004). Research methods for nursing and health science (3rd ed.). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Education Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C. (2002). Speech to print. Baltimore, USA: Paul. H.Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, A., Moir, L., & Millsteed, J. (2013). The impact of switching on family caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(2), 169–175. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.692172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odding, E., Roebroeck, M. E., & Stam, H. J. (2006). The epidemiology of Cerebral Palsy: Incidence, impairments and risk factors. Disability Rehabilitation, 28, 183–191. doi:10.1080/09638280500158422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California, USA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, L. I., Pacciulio, A. M., Dos Santos, C. A., & Dos Santos, J. L. (2011). Pretend play of children with cerebral palsy. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 31(4), 390–402. doi:10.3109/01942638.2011.572149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, G. (2007). Pragmatic Organisation Dynamic (PODD) communication books: Direct access templates. Melbourne, Australia: Cerebral Palsy Education Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, G. (2017). Pragmatic Organisation Dynamic Display (PODD) communication books: Alternate access templates. Melbourne, Australia: Cerebral Palsy Education Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, G., & Cafiero, J. M. (2007). Pragmatic Organisation Dynamic Display (PODD) communication books: A promising practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Perspective on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 121–129. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.121
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., Paneth, N., Leviton, A., Goldstein, M., & Bax, M. (2007a). A report: The definition and classification of cerebral palsy. April 2006. [Supplemtary material]. Developmental Medicine Child Neurology, 49, 8–14. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.tb12610.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauter, D. W., Myers., S. R., & Classen., A. I. (2017). Literacy instruction for young children with severe speech and physical impairments: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools & Early Intervention, 10(4), 389–407. doi:10.1080/19411243.2017.1359132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinth, Y., (2001). Assistive technology: Computers and augmentative communication. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational therapy for children (4th ed., pp. 571-604). St. Louis, USA: Mosby-Year Book.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, L., & Lewis, M. (2000). Assistive technology for the very young: Creating responsive environments. Infants and Young Children, 12(4), 34–52. doi:10.1097/00001163-200012040-00009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachman.G., Gibson, B. E. (2014). ‘Communicative competence’ in the field of augmentative and alternative communication: a review and critique. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(1), 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonck, M., McCormack, C., & Chard, G. (2011). Irish occupational therapists’ views of electronic assistive technology. British Jounral of Occupational Therapy, 74(4), 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker, J. G., & Harris, S. R. (2009). A reflection on motor learning theory in pediatric occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(1), 29–48. doi:10.1177/000841740907600108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar